---
title: "Sirius PV vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Sirius PV vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/sirius-pv-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Sirius PV vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Sirius PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Turkey | China |
| Headquarters | Ankara | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2021 | 1997 |
| Employees | 500-1000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 3-5 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://siriuspv.com](https://siriuspv.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Sirius PV is a solar photovoltaic module manufacturer established in 2021 as a brand and subsidiary of Elin A.Ş., a Turkish industrial group founded in 1981. The company operates multiple automated production facilities across Europe and the United States, with a combined capacity of over 3.5 GW, positioning itself as...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Sirius PV | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Sirius PV | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Sirius PV | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Sirius PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Sirius PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Sirius PV | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Sirius PV was established in 2021 as a brand under Elin Energy, a Turkish industrial group with roots going back to 1981. The company operates manufacturing facilities in Turkey and opened an additional assembly plant in Texas, United States, in 2024. It claims a combined production capacity of up to 3.5 GW across three factories, a top bankability ranking in Europe, and commercial presence in more than 40 countries. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, and has grown into one of the world's largest vertically integrated module producers, with annual manufacturing capacity exceeding 80 GW and cumulative global shipments surpassing 225 GW as of early 2025. Trina Solar is a consistent fixture on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list and has received a 100 percent bankability rating in independent module bankability assessments. In terms of institutional trust and scale, Trina Solar holds a substantially stronger global footprint.

Sirius PV's product range centers on N-type TOPCon bifacial half-cut modules in both glass-backsheet and glass-glass configurations, with efficiencies reaching roughly 21 percent. The lineup is suited primarily to residential rooftop and light commercial installations, and the European manufacturing origin can be an advantage when project lenders require non-Asian supply chains. Trina Solar covers a broader spectrum: the Vertex S+ family (NEG9R series, 430-460 W) targets residential and commercial rooftops with i-TOPCon technology and the latest G3 generation pushing efficiencies up to 24.3 percent, while larger-format Vertex N modules serve utility-scale ground-mount projects. Trina backs its panels with a 30-year linear performance warranty capped at a maximum degradation of 0.35 percent per year.

For most international buyers - whether a residential installer, a C&I developer, or a project finance team - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default owing to its decades-long track record, deep Tier 1 bankability documentation, and global spare-parts and service network. Sirius PV is a credible option where European or US domestic production is a contractual or political requirement, but it cannot yet match Trina Solar's scale, technology roadmap depth, or independent third-party validation history. The two brands are not interchangeable in institutional contexts, though for a straightforward rooftop installation either will perform reliably given comparable technology.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Sirius PV vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/sirius-pv-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Sirius PV vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/sirius-pv-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Sirius PV vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/sirius-pv-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/sirius-pv-vs-trina-solar