---
title: "Silfab vs Hyundai - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Silfab vs Hyundai solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-hyundai"
---

# Silfab vs Hyundai

Hyundai has the broader catalog (65 vs 47 models). Hyundai leads on peak efficiency at 23.40%. Hyundai leans bifacial (66% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Silfab | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Canada | South Korea |
| Headquarters | Mississauga | Seongnam-si |
| Founded | 2010 | 2004 |
| Employees | 800+ | 206 |
| Annual capacity | 1.6 GW/year | 1.35 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | Korea Stock Exchange: 322000 |
| Website | [https://www.silfabsolar.com](https://www.silfabsolar.com) | [https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr](https://www.hd-hyundaies.co.kr) |

Silfab Solar is a North American leader in the design, development, and manufacture of high-efficiency, premium-quality solar cells and modules. Leveraging over 40 years of solar experience, they operate fully automated facilities in Washington, South Carolina, and Ontario, Canada. Their products are designed and...

HD Hyundai Energy Solutions is a global provider of solar cells and modules, offering solutions for residential, commercial, and utility-scale projects. They provide monofacial, bifacial, and shingled PV modules, along with inverters and various PV solutions. The company is committed to developing next-generation...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Silfab | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 47 | 65 | +18 |
| Max Power | 640 W | 640 W |  |
| Avg Power | 429 W | 442 W | +13 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Silfab | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 22.92% | 23.40% | +0.48 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.56% | 21.49% | +0.93 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Silfab | Hyundai | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.341%/°C | -0.300%/°C | +0.041 |
| Bifacial Share | 14 (30%) | 43 (66%) | +36 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 27.4 yrs | +2.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Hyundai skews to higher efficiency: 6% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Silfab | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 19 (40.4%) | 7 (10.8%) |
| 20-21% | 5 (10.6%) | 17 (26.2%) |
| 21-22% | 10 (21.3%) | 12 (18.5%) |
| 22-23% | 13 (27.7%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 4 (6.2%) |


## Power distribution

Silfab offers more 600W+ panels (6% of lineup)


| Power band | Silfab | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 22 (46.8%) | 8 (12.3%) |
| 400-499W | 10 (21.3%) | 49 (75.4%) |
| 500-599W | 12 (25.5%) | 5 (7.7%) |
| 600-699W | 3 (6.4%) | 3 (4.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (45%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (38%)


| Technology | Silfab | Hyundai |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 21 (44.7%) | 25 (38.5%) |
| N-type | 19 (40.4%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 6 (12.8%) | 9 (13.8%) |
| TOPCon | 1 (2.1%) | 6 (9.2%) |
| HJT | 0 | 25 (38.5%) |


## Top panels, Silfab


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SIL-640 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-640-xl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SIL-630 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-630-xl) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SIL-620 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-620-xl) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SIL-590 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-590-xm) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-580-xm-bifacial) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm-bifacial) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SIL-570 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SIL-540-XM-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-540-xm-bifacial) | 540 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SIL-530 QM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-qm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SIL-530 XM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-xm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Hyundai


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HiS-T640NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t640nj) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HiS-T635NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t635nj) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HiS-T630NJ](https://comparepv.com/panel/hd-hyundai-energy-solutions-his-t630nj) | 630 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HiT-H520LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h520lf-fb-zb) | 520 | 23.4 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HiT-H515LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h515lf-fb-zb) | 515 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HiT-H510LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h510lf-fb-zb) | 510 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HiT-H505LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h505lf-fb-zb) | 505 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HiT-H500LF-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h500lf-fb-zb) | 500 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HiT-H460LE-FB(ZB)](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460le-fb-zb) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HiT-H460CE-BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/hyundai-hit-h460ce-bf) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Hyundai Energy Solutions is a South Korean manufacturer headquartered in Seongnam-si, a solar division that traces its origins to 2004 within Hyundai Heavy Industries and was spun off as an independent company in 2016. It holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status and operates module production facilities in South Korea's North Chungcheong Province, with reported annual module capacity of over 1.4 GW. Silfab Solar is a North American manufacturer founded and headquartered in Ontario, Canada, with module plants in Bellingham, Washington, and a newly operational cell-and-module facility in Fort Mill, South Carolina that targets roughly 1.3 GW of module output. Silfab also carries Tier 1 bankable recognition and has secured both private financing and U.S. Advanced Manufacturing Tax Credits under the IRA. In terms of global institutional footprint and conglomerate backing, Hyundai holds the broader corporate reach.

Both brands have converged on N-type TOPCon cell technology for their current premium lines. Hyundai's lineup spans residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial installations, with some models using shingled cell architecture. Silfab's flagship Prime NTC series is aimed squarely at the premium residential segment in the United States and Canada, and independent lab testing by Kiwa-PVEL and RETC has reinforced its reputation for above-average real-world output. SolarReviews ranked Silfab fourth among all solar panel brands in 2025, while Hyundai placed ninth in their 2023 equivalent list.

For a typical U.S. homeowner in 2025, Silfab has a modest practical edge - its domestic manufacturing qualifies installers and buyers for IRA incentive stacking, its lab performance scores are well documented, and its warranty support is centered in North America. Hyundai remains a solid, globally bankable alternative, particularly for buyers outside the U.S. or for commercial projects where its broader distribution network is an advantage. The two brands are close enough in technology and quality that local installer availability and final system price should be the deciding factors.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels \| Hyundai Solar Panels Complete Review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/silfab-solar-panels-complete-review \| Silfab Solar Panels Expert Review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/silfab-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Silfab Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/ \| Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://silfabsolar.com/silfab-solar-raises-100-million-to-scale-its-cell-manufacturing-facility-in-fort-mill-s-c/ \| Silfab raises $100M to scale Fort Mill SC cell manufacturing facility \| article

Sources:

\- \[Hyundai Solar Panels Complete Review 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/complete-review-hyundai-solar-panels)

\- \[Silfab Solar Panels Expert Review 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/silfab-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Silfab Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/silfab-solar-panels-complete-review/)

\- \[Hyundai builds 1.37 GW solar cell factory in South Korea - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2021/03/12/hyundai-builds-1-37-gw-solar-cell-factory-in-south-korea/)

\- \[Silfab raises $100M to scale Fort Mill SC cell manufacturing facility\](https://silfabsolar.com/silfab-solar-raises-100-million-to-scale-its-cell-manufacturing-facility-in-fort-mill-s-c/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Silfab vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-hyundai)
- [Silfab vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-hyundai)
- [Silfab vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-hyundai)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-hyundai

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.