--- title: "Silfab vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Silfab vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-aeet" --- # Silfab vs AEET Silfab has the broader catalog (47 vs 5 models). Silfab leads on peak efficiency at 22.92%. Silfab leans bifacial (30% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Silfab | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Canada | | | Headquarters | Mississauga | | | Founded | 2010 | | | Employees | 800+ | | | Annual capacity | 1.6 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.silfabsolar.com](https://www.silfabsolar.com) | | Silfab Solar is a North American leader in the design, development, and manufacture of high-efficiency, premium-quality solar cells and modules. Leveraging over 40 years of solar experience, they operate fully automated facilities in Washington, South Carolina, and Ontario, Canada. Their products are designed and... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Silfab | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 47 | 5 | +42 | | Max Power | 640 W | 200 W | +440 W | | Avg Power | 429 W | 190 W | +239 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Silfab | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.92% | 15.70% | +7.22 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 20.56% | 14.90% | +5.66 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Silfab | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.341%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 14 (30%) | 0 (0%) | +30 pp | | Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +5.0 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | Silfab | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 19 (40.4%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 20-21% | 5 (10.6%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 10 (21.3%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 13 (27.7%) | 0 | ## Power distribution Silfab offers more 600W+ panels (6% of lineup) | Power band | Silfab | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 22 (46.8%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 400-499W | 10 (21.3%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 12 (25.5%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 3 (6.4%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (45%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | Silfab | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 21 (44.7%) | 5 (100.0%) | | N-type | 19 (40.4%) | 0 | | Unknown | 6 (12.8%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 1 (2.1%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Silfab | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SIL-640 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-640-xl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SIL-630 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-630-xl) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SIL-620 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-620-xl) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SIL-590 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-590-xm) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-580-xm-bifacial) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm-bifacial) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SIL-570 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SIL-540-XM-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-540-xm-bifacial) | 540 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SIL-530 QM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-qm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SIL-530 XM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-xm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Silfab Solar, founded in 2010 and headquartered in Ontario, Canada - with module manufacturing plants in Bellingham, Washington and a new cell and module facility under development in Fort Mill, South Carolina - is a confirmed Tier 1 bankable manufacturer, certified by third-party laboratories Kiwa PVEL and RETC. Its combined North American module production capacity has been reported at several gigawatts, with roughly 1 GW of domestic cell capacity coming online in South Carolina following a $100 million capital raise. AEET Energy Group GmbH is a substantially smaller operation based in Bad Gandersheim, Germany. The company functions primarily as a photovoltaic wholesale distributor and EPC partner, supplying own-brand monocrystalline, polycrystalline, and thin-film modules through a network of more than 500 certified installer partners across Germany and neighboring European markets. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 listing or comparable bankability certification was identified for AEET in available sources. On institutional footprint, Silfab is the materially stronger player. Silfab's product lineup has evolved toward premium N-type technology. Its Elite series pairs back-contact cell design with PERC for high residential rooftop efficiency, while the newer Prime NTC line - confirmed by pv-magazine and Business Wire announcements in 2023 and 2024 - employs N-type TOPCon cells targeting both residential and commercial buyers who want lower long-term degradation and better performance in high-temperature climates. The brand earned Top Performer status in the 2025 Kiwa PVEL PV Module Reliability Scorecard, reinforcing its credibility for North American projects. AEET's publicly listed modules cover a more modest power and efficiency range oriented toward value residential and small commercial installations in central Europe, and no TOPCon or HJT product transition was identified in available sources, suggesting its catalog leans on older-generation cell technology. For a typical buyer in 2025, these two brands serve substantially different markets and are not straightforwardly interchangeable. A North American homeowner or commercial developer prioritizing domestic content, strong third-party reliability validation, and next-generation cell technology is clearly better served by Silfab. AEET is the more relevant option for small European installers sourcing regionally within Germany, but its narrower product profile and unconfirmed bankability standing limit its appeal outside that local context. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/silfab-solar-panels-complete-review \| Silfab Solar Panels Expert Review 2025 - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/09/20/silfab-solar-to-start-us-cell-production-new-line-of-topcon-panels/ \| Silfab Solar to start US cell production, new TOPCon line - pv-magazine \| article \- https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20250604106010/en/Silfab-Solar-Earns-Top-Performer-Status-in-the-2025-PV-Module-Reliability-Scorecard-From-Kiwa-PVEL \| Silfab earns Top Performer in 2025 Kiwa PVEL Reliability Scorecard \| article \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar directory \| article \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal buyer's guide entry \| review Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Silfab vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [Silfab vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [Silfab vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/silfab-vs-aeet Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.