---
title: "Shinson Technology vs Silfab - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Shinson Technology vs Silfab solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-silfab"
---

# Shinson Technology vs Silfab

Shinson Technology has the broader catalog (105 vs 47 models). Shinson Technology leads on peak efficiency at 23.23%. Shinson Technology leans bifacial (62% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Shinson Technology | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Canada |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Mississauga |
| Founded | 2010 | 2010 |
| Employees | 500+ | 800+ |
| Annual capacity | 10+ GW/year | 1.6 GW/year |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://shinsontech.com](http://shinsontech.com) | [https://www.silfabsolar.com](https://www.silfabsolar.com) |

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...

Silfab Solar is a North American leader in the design, development, and manufacture of high-efficiency, premium-quality solar cells and modules. Leveraging over 40 years of solar experience, they operate fully automated facilities in Washington, South Carolina, and Ontario, Canada. Their products are designed and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Shinson Technology | Silfab | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 105 | 47 | +58 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 640 W | +80 W |
| Avg Power | 477 W | 429 W | +48 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Shinson Technology | Silfab | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.23% | 22.92% | +0.31 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.54% | 20.56% | +0.02 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Shinson Technology | Silfab | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.314%/°C | -0.341%/°C | +0.027 |
| Bifacial Share | 65 (62%) | 14 (30%) | +32 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Shinson Technology skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Shinson Technology | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 24 (22.9%) | 19 (40.4%) |
| 20-21% | 17 (16.2%) | 5 (10.6%) |
| 21-22% | 31 (29.5%) | 10 (21.3%) |
| 22-23% | 28 (26.7%) | 13 (27.7%) |
| 23%+ | 5 (4.8%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Shinson Technology offers more 600W+ panels (18% of lineup)


| Power band | Shinson Technology | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (23.8%) | 22 (46.8%) |
| 400-499W | 45 (42.9%) | 10 (21.3%) |
| 500-599W | 16 (15.2%) | 12 (25.5%) |
| 600-699W | 13 (12.4%) | 3 (6.4%) |
| 700W+ | 6 (5.7%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (40%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (45%)


| Technology | Shinson Technology | Silfab |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 42 (40.0%) | 1 (2.1%) |
| PERC | 35 (33.3%) | 21 (44.7%) |
| HJT | 15 (14.3%) | 0 |
| Flexible | 5 (4.8%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 4 (3.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 4 (3.8%) | 6 (12.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 19 (40.4%) |


## Top panels, Shinson Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [S685M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s685m66nt4bf) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [S680M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s680m66nt4bf) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Silfab


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SIL-640 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-640-xl) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SIL-630 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-630-xl) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SIL-620 XL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-620-xl) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SIL-590 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-590-xm) | 590 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SIL-580-XM+-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-580-xm-bifacial) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SIL-570 XM+ BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm-bifacial) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SIL-570 XM+](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-570-xm) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SIL-540-XM-BIFACIAL](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-540-xm-bifacial) | 540 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SIL-530 QM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-qm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SIL-530 XM](https://comparepv.com/panel/silfab-sil-530-xm) | 530 | 22.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Shinson Technology is a Chinese solar manufacturer founded in 2010, with production facilities in Asia and sales offices across Europe, Australia, and the United States, and a stated annual capacity in the range of several gigawatts. Publicly available searches did not turn up confirmation that Shinson appears on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 module manufacturer list, so its bankability status should be treated as unverified rather than assumed. Silfab Solar, by contrast, is headquartered in Canada with manufacturing exclusively in North America, across facilities in Toronto, Bellingham, and Burlington, and is consistently cited as a Tier 1 bankable brand vetted by third-party labs such as Kiwa-PVEL and RETC. Between the two, Silfab has the clearer, independently documented institutional footprint, including a top-five ranking in SolarReviews' 2025 brand rankings.

In terms of product focus, Shinson's catalog spans a wide wattage range from smaller residential modules up to large-format panels for commercial and utility use, with a mix of TOPCon, PERC, and HJT cell technology, positioning it as a broad, value-oriented supplier for varied global markets. Silfab is more narrowly focused but well-documented: its Prime series targets premium residential rooftops with black-on-black TOPCon modules, while its Utility series serves ground-mount and commercial-scale bifacial installations, both moving toward N-type TOPCon cells with strong low-light and high-temperature performance and long linear performance warranties.

For a typical buyer in 2025, especially in North America where local manufacturing, warranty support, and confirmed Tier 1 bankability influence financing and incentive eligibility, Silfab is the safer default choice given its verifiable track record. Shinson may appeal in markets prioritizing lower cost and wide product variety, but buyers should independently confirm its Tier 1 or bankability status before relying on it for financed or utility-scale projects, since this could not be verified through available sources.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/silfab-solar-panels-complete-review \| 2025 Silfab Solar Panels Expert Review \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/best-companies/silfab-solar-panels \| Silfab Solar Panels Review (Cost, Efficiency & Performance) \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2023/09/20/silfab-solar-to-start-us-cell-production-new-line-of-topcon-panels/ \| Silfab Solar to start US cell production, new line of TOPCon panels \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology Solar Panels Review: Pros, Cons & Specs \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. company profile \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Shinson Technology vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Silfab](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-silfab)
- [Shinson Technology vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Silfab](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-silfab)
- [Shinson Technology vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Silfab](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-silfab)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-silfab

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.