---
title: "Shinson Technology vs Recom - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Shinson Technology vs Recom solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-recom"
---

# Shinson Technology vs Recom

Shinson Technology has the broader catalog (105 vs 61 models). Recom leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. Shinson Technology leans bifacial (62% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Shinson Technology | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | Italy |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Bolzano |
| Founded | 2010 | 2007 |
| Employees | 500+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 10+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://shinsontech.com](http://shinsontech.com) | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) |

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Shinson Technology | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 105 | 61 | +44 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 730 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 477 W | 548 W | +70 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Shinson Technology | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.23% | 24.30% | +1.07 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.54% | 22.68% | +2.14 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Shinson Technology | Recom | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.314%/°C | -0.284%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 65 (62%) | 23 (38%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Recom skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Shinson Technology | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 24 (22.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (16.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 31 (29.5%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| 22-23% | 28 (26.7%) | 36 (59.0%) |
| 23%+ | 5 (4.8%) | 20 (32.8%) |


## Power distribution

Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | Shinson Technology | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 45 (42.9%) | 34 (55.7%) |
| 500-599W | 16 (15.2%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| 600-699W | 13 (12.4%) | 12 (19.7%) |
| 700W+ | 6 (5.7%) | 10 (16.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (40%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%)


| Technology | Shinson Technology | Recom |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 42 (40.0%) | 51 (83.6%) |
| PERC | 35 (33.3%) | 0 |
| HJT | 15 (14.3%) | 5 (8.2%) |
| Flexible | 5 (4.8%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 4 (3.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 4 (3.8%) | 0 |
| N-type | 0 | 5 (8.2%) |


## Top panels, Shinson Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [S685M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s685m66nt4bf) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [S680M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s680m66nt4bf) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Recom


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Recom Technologies is an Italian solar manufacturer founded in 2007, with roots tracing back to early operations in Greece. Its headquarters are in Milan, and it maintains cell and module production facilities in the Padua region after transferring output from a former French plant in 2024. The company holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and reports an annual module production capacity exceeding 3.2 GW, distributing products to more than 110 countries. Shinson Technology is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2010 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu. It supplies panels, inverters, storage batteries, and solar climate-control equipment to international markets, but no independent confirmation of BloombergNEF Tier 1 or equivalent bankability status was found in available sources. On institutional footprint, Recom holds a clear advantage as a verified Tier 1 European producer with traceable third-party project financing history.

Recom's product lineup spans five cell technologies - HJT, TOPCon, Back Contact, Shingled, and PERC - organized into named series such as Lion (HJT), Lynx (TOPCon), and Puma (shingled). This breadth makes it a viable choice for premium residential rooftops seeking high efficiency as well as for commercial and light utility-scale ground mounts where bankability is a financing requirement. Shinson's portfolio leans toward residential and small commercial applications, with the S-Nano series for compact installations and the S-MAX line emphasizing mechanical resilience; the company also produces HJT modules alongside a BIPV offering under the S-Blade name, positioning itself as a lower-entry-cost diversified supplier rather than a premium-segment specialist.

For a typical buyer in 2025 requiring project financing or long-term performance guarantees, Recom is the more defensible choice given its documented Tier 1 status and European manufacturing traceability. Shinson can be competitive on price for off-grid, small residential, or cash-purchase projects where bankability criteria are not a constraint, but buyers should request independent certification documentation before committing to larger volumes.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/recom\_company\_profile.pdf \| Recom Technologies - BloombergNEF Tier 1 company profile \| article

\- https://solartechonline.com/blog/recom-solar-panels-complete-guide/ \| RECOM Solar Panels - Complete 2025 Buyer's Guide and Performance Review \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/recom \| Recom Technologies - ENF Solar manufacturer directory entry \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology - ENF Solar manufacturer directory entry \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/recom-review.html \| Recom solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes \| review

Sources:

\- \[RECOM Solar Panels: Complete 2025 Buyer's Guide & Performance Review\](https://solartechonline.com/blog/recom-solar-panels-complete-guide/)

\- \[Recom Technologies Ltd - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/recom)

\- \[Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology)

\- \[LARGEST EUROPEAN SOLAR MANUFACTURER BloombergNEF TIER 1 - pv-magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/recom\_company\_profile.pdf)

\- \[Recom Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/recom-review.html)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Shinson Technology vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-recom)
- [Shinson Technology vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-recom)
- [Shinson Technology vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Recom](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-recom)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-recom

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.