---
title: "Shinson Technology vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Shinson Technology vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-akcome"
---

# Shinson Technology vs AKCOME

Shinson Technology has the broader catalog (105 vs 3 models). Shinson Technology leads on peak efficiency at 23.23%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Shinson Technology | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2010 | 2003 |
| Employees | 500+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 10+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://shinsontech.com](http://shinsontech.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

Shinson Technology is a leading professional supplier in the renewable energy industry, specializing in the production and distribution of high-quality PV modules, completed PV kits, and energy storage solutions. With a commitment to sustainable energy solutions, they strive to provide innovative and reliable products...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Shinson Technology | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 105 | 3 | +102 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 700 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 477 W | 672 W | +194 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Shinson Technology | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.23% | 22.54% | +0.69 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 20.54% | 21.63% | +1.09 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Shinson Technology | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.314%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.074 |
| Bifacial Share | 65 (62%) | 3 (100%) | +38 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.7 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +2.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Shinson Technology skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Shinson Technology | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 24 (22.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 17 (16.2%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 31 (29.5%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 28 (26.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 5 (4.8%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Shinson Technology | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 25 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 45 (42.9%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 16 (15.2%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 13 (12.4%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 6 (5.7%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (40%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Shinson Technology | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 42 (40.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 35 (33.3%) | 0 |
| HJT | 15 (14.3%) | 3 (100.0%) |
| Flexible | 5 (4.8%) | 0 |
| BIPV | 4 (3.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 4 (3.8%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Shinson Technology


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [S720M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s720m66ht4bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [S715M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s715m66ht4bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [S710M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s710m66ht4bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [S705M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s705m66ht4bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [S700M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66nt4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [S700M66HT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s700m66ht4bf) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [S695M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s695m66nt4bf) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [S690M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s690m66nt4bf) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [S685M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s685m66nt4bf) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [S680M66NT4BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/shinson-technology-s680m66nt4bf) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME (formally Jiangsu Akcome Science and Technology Co., Ltd.) is a Chinese solar manufacturer that rose to mid-tier prominence during the 2010s and held BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status through early 2024. At its operational peak the company claimed module production capacity in the range of several gigawatts per year. However, 2024 brought severe financial difficulty: a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization, and AKCOME's shares were delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in August 2024 after trading below CNY 1 for 20 consecutive days. Its institutional footprint, once meaningful, is now compromised by that restructuring. Shinson Technology, headquartered in Changzhou, China and founded in 2010, is a considerably smaller player with a reported workforce of around 500 professionals. No BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation was found for Shinson in publicly available sources, positioning it firmly as a niche supplier rather than a bankable tier manufacturer.

On the product side, AKCOME had built a recognized range covering both mono PERC and TOPCon half-cut panels, with its Kookaburra series listed on Australia's Clean Energy Council approved list and product warranties of 15 years - shorter than the 25-30 years now standard among leading brands. Its panels were aimed primarily at budget residential and light commercial rooftops. Shinson Technology offers a broader technology spread spanning PERC, TOPCon, HJT, and bifacial N-type modules across a wide wattage range, including higher-output options suited to ground-mount and carport applications. The coverage of multiple cell technologies suggests a contract-manufacturing or small-volume multi-segment approach rather than a focused premium lineup.

For a typical buyer in 2025-2026, neither brand is a straightforward recommendation. AKCOME's bankruptcy proceedings create genuine warranty continuity risk that outweighs its competitive pricing. Shinson Technology lacks the bankability credentials and independent review coverage that project financiers or cautious residential buyers normally require. Buyers seeking reliable warranty support and financing eligibility are better served by established Tier 1 manufacturers; between these two, Shinson carries less acute financial risk simply by not being in active restructuring, but neither brand offers the institutional confidence a standard buyer should expect.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces Chinese stock delisting - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/ \| AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology \| Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. Solar Panels Profile - ENF Solar \| article

Sources:

\- \[AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces Chinese stock delisting - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels - Independent Review by Solar Choice\](https://www.solarchoice.net.au/products/panels/akcome-solar-panels-review/)

\- \[AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome)

\- \[Shinson Technology Co., Ltd. Solar Panels Profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/shinson-technology)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Shinson Technology vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Shinson Technology vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Shinson Technology vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/shinson-technology-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.