--- title: "Sharp vs A.B. Energy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Sharp vs A.B. Energy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/sharp-vs-a-b-energy" --- # Sharp vs A.B. Energy Sharp has the broader catalog (19 vs 0 models). Sharp leans bifacial (53% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Sharp | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Japan | Germany | | Headquarters | Sakai, Osaka Prefecture | Wiesbaden | | Founded | 1912 | 1996 | | Employees | 40,123 | 1,400 | | Annual capacity | 15.4 GW/year | | | Tier 1 | yes | | | Listed | TYO: 6753 | Xetra, Frankfurt Stock Exchange: AB9 | | Website | [https://global.sharp](https://global.sharp) | [https://abo-energy.com](https://abo-energy.com) | Sharp Corporation is a Japanese electronics company founded in 1912. It operates globally, offering a wide range of products including consumer electronics, home appliances, energy solutions, and business solutions. Since 2016, it has been majority-owned by Foxconn. ABO Energy is a renewable energy company that develops and constructs renewable energy projects, focusing on wind, solar, and storage facilities. They offer turnkey solutions and have connected several gigawatts of nominal output to the grid. The company is active internationally and is committed to driving the energy... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Sharp | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 19 | 0 | +19 | | Max Power | 740 W | 0 W | +740 W | | Avg Power | 576 W | 0 W | +576 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Sharp | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.82% | - | | | Avg Efficiency | 22.20% | - | | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Sharp | A.B. Energy | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 10 (53%) | 0 (0%) | +53 pp | | Avg Warranty | 27.6 yrs | - | | ## Efficiency distribution Sharp skews to higher efficiency: 32% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Sharp | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 1 (5.3%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 7 (36.8%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 5 (26.3%) | 0 | | 23%+ | 6 (31.6%) | 0 | ## Power distribution Sharp offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup) | Power band | Sharp | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 6 (31.6%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 6 (31.6%) | 0 | | 700W+ | 7 (36.8%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (37%) | Technology | Sharp | A.B. Energy | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 7 (36.8%) | 0 | | PERC | 7 (36.8%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 5 (26.3%) | 0 | ## Top panels, Sharp | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [GSD8K66H-740WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-740wt) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [GSD8K66H-735WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-735wt) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [GSD8K66H-730WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-730wt) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [GSD8K66H-725WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-725wt) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [GSD8K66H-720WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-720wt) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [GSD8K66H-715WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-715wt) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [GSD8K66H-710WT](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-gsd8k66h-710wt) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [NB-JD580](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd580) | 580 | 22.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [NB-JD575](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd575) | 575 | 22.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [NB-JD570](https://comparepv.com/panel/sharp-nb-jd570) | 570 | 22.1 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Sharp is a Japanese electronics and energy conglomerate founded in 1912 and headquartered in Osaka, with a solar manufacturing capacity of 15.4 GW and confirmed Tier 1 bankable status - a designation that signals lenders and project financiers regard the manufacturer as sufficiently stable to back. It is publicly listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TYO) and employs more than 40,000 people globally, giving it a deep institutional footprint. A.B. Energy, by contrast, is a German company founded in 1996 and listed on Xetra and the Frankfurt Stock Exchange with roughly 1,400 employees. Available data shows no documented solar panel manufacturing portfolio for A.B. Energy - panel count, output, and efficiency figures all register at zero - which strongly suggests the company operates as a renewable energy project developer or investor rather than a panel fabricator. The two entities are therefore not comparable as product manufacturers in any conventional sense. Sharp's documented lineup of 19 panel models speaks for itself on performance. Average module output sits at 576 Wp, with the top model reaching 740 Wp - well into utility-scale territory. Average panel efficiency is 22.2%, with the best module hitting 23.82%, driven primarily by the heterojunction (HJT) cell technology that accounts for roughly 37% of the portfolio. A temperature coefficient of -0.30% per degree Celsius is competitive, meaning real-world output holds up well in hot climates. Approximately 53% of models are bifacial, suited to ground-mount and flat-roof commercial installations that can capture rear-side albedo gains. Average warranty coverage of 27.6 years further signals a premium, long-horizon positioning. Sharp's lineup squarely targets residential premium rooftops, commercial flat roofs, and mid-scale ground-mount projects where bankability and high efficiency justify a price premium. For any buyer in 2025 evaluating these two names as solar panel suppliers, Sharp is the only choice with a verifiable manufactured product. A.B. Energy's zero-panel portfolio means it cannot credibly be specified in a module procurement. Buyers interested in A.B. Energy's renewable project development services are comparing a different service category entirely - project finance and development - not module hardware. Sharp, meanwhile, stands as a technically strong, Tier 1 bankable manufacturer with a well-rounded portfolio for buyers seeking performance certainty and long warranty coverage. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels \| Sharp Solar Panels: How They Compare To Other Top Brands \| review \- https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/ \| Sharp Solar - Profile and Reviews 2026 - EnergySage \| review \- https://comparepv.com/reviews/sharp \| Sharp Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV \| review \- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings \| Tier 1 Solar Panels List 2025: Updated Manufacturers and Rankings \| article Sources: \- \[Sharp Solar Panels: How They Compare To Other Top Brands - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/sharp-solar-panels) \- \[Sharp Solar - Profile & Reviews 2026 - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/supplier/445/sharp-solar/) \- \[Sharp Solar Panels Review 2026 - ComparePV\](https://comparepv.com/reviews/sharp) \- \[Tier 1 Solar Panels List 2025 - RENVU\](https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings) \- \[ABO Energy GmbH & Co KGaA - Bloomberg Markets\](https://www.bloomberg.com/profile/company/4442585Z:IM) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Sharp vs AE Solar](https://comparepv.com/sharp-vs-ae-solar) - [AEET vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/aeet-vs-a-b-energy) - [Sharp vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/sharp-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-a-b-energy) - [Sharp vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/sharp-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-a-b-energy) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/sharp-vs-a-b-energy Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.