---
title: "Seraphim vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Seraphim vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-znshine"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/seraphim/znshine.png"
---

# Seraphim vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 160 models). Seraphim leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Seraphim | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Suqian |
| Founded | 2011 | 1988 |
| Employees | 1001-5000 | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity | 13 GW/year | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Seraphim | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 160 | 212 | +52 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 670 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 549 W | 535 W | +15 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Seraphim | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 22.83% | +0.67 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 21.35% | +0.47 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Seraphim | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.316%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.013 |
| Bifacial Share | 111 (69%) | 89 (42%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Seraphim | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 32 (20.0%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 58 (36.2%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 51 (31.9%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (11.9%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (2.4%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | Seraphim | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.2%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 55 (34.4%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 47 (29.4%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 45 (28.1%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 11 (6.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: PERC (52%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (63%)


| Technology | Seraphim | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 84 (52.5%) | 134 (63.2%) |
| TOPCon | 66 (41.2%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| HJT | 6 (3.8%) | 0 |
| N-type | 4 (2.5%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Seraphim is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 2011 under the name Jiangsu Seraphim Solar Systems Co., Ltd. It has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status continuously since 2015 - more than a decade of consecutive recognition - and has scaled annual production capacity to approximately 13 GW. ZNShine, also headquartered in China, has likewise appeared on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list since 2015 and operates at a production capacity of around 6 GW per year. ZNShine has additionally been upgraded to a B rating in PV Tech's separate bankability ranking, signaling growing confidence among project lenders. On balance, Seraphim carries the stronger institutional footprint, supported by its larger manufacturing scale and six PVEL Top Performer awards.

Seraphim's current product lineup is anchored by N-type TOPCon technology, most notably the Nebula series, which reaches efficiencies of up to approximately 22.5%, combined with half-cut cell and multi-busbar designs. These modules cover a wide range of applications from residential rooftop systems to utility-scale ground-mount farms. ZNShine fields a notably broad technology portfolio: alongside bifacial N-type TOPCon modules, the company offers an HJT heterojunction series with outputs up to 750 W, optimized for large solar plants, commercial rooftops, and high-temperature or high-humidity environments. ZNShine's go-to-market approach is clearly tilted toward B2B clients such as EPC contractors and project developers, and extends to integrated battery energy storage and PV-plus-hydrogen solutions.

For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer seeking a bankable value-tier panel or a developer procuring modules for a commercial project - Seraphim is the marginally safer default, given its larger scale and longer documented record in project finance. ZNShine is a credible alternative, particularly where high-output HJT modules or utility-scale B2B procurement are the priority. Both brands occupy the same mid-tier segment of the market, and in many procurement contexts they are effectively interchangeable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Seraphim vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Seraphim vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Seraphim vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.