--- title: "Seraphim vs Waaree - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Seraphim vs Waaree solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-waaree" --- # Seraphim vs Waaree Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 160 models). Waaree leads on peak efficiency at 23.51%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Seraphim | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | India | | Headquarters | Changzhou | Mumbai | | Founded | 2011 | 1990 | | Employees | 1001-5000 | 8500+ | | Annual capacity | 13 GW/year | 13.3 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | | NSE: WAAREEENER | | Website | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) | Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and... Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Seraphim | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 160 | 222 | +62 | | Max Power | 730 W | 730 W | | | Avg Power | 549 W | 371 W | +178 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Seraphim | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 23.51% | +0.01 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 18.39% | +3.43 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Seraphim | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.316%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.046 | | Bifacial Share | 111 (69%) | 85 (38%) | +31 pp | | Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 21.7 yrs | +7.1 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Seraphim | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 32 (20.0%) | 47 (21.2%) | | 21-22% | 58 (36.2%) | 14 (6.3%) | | 22-23% | 51 (31.9%) | 13 (5.9%) | | 23%+ | 19 (11.9%) | 9 (4.1%) | | \<20% | 0 | 139 (62.6%) | ## Power distribution Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup) | Power band | Seraphim | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 2 (1.2%) | 124 (55.9%) | | 400-499W | 55 (34.4%) | 35 (15.8%) | | 500-599W | 47 (29.4%) | 36 (16.2%) | | 600-699W | 45 (28.1%) | 20 (9.0%) | | 700W+ | 11 (6.9%) | 7 (3.2%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%) | Technology | Seraphim | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | PERC | 84 (52.5%) | 107 (48.2%) | | TOPCon | 66 (41.2%) | 12 (5.4%) | | HJT | 6 (3.8%) | 7 (3.2%) | | N-type | 4 (2.5%) | 8 (3.6%) | | Unknown | 0 | 88 (39.6%) | ## Top panels, Seraphim | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Waaree | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Seraphim is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Changzhou, founded in 2011, with approximately 13 GW of annual production capacity spread across facilities in Jiangsu, Shanxi, and a 300 MW plant in South Africa's Eastern Cape province. The company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for 11 consecutive years and has earned six PVEL Top Performer awards, reflecting strong independent reliability testing results. Waaree Energies, headquartered in Mumbai with corporate roots going back to 1989, pivoted into solar manufacturing in 2007 and has since grown into India's largest module producer, reaching 22.3 GW of global capacity by the end of 2025 - comprising 19.7 GW in India and 2.6 GW in the United States. Waaree has appeared on the BNEF Tier 1 list for 35 consecutive quarters and was the first Indian manufacturer to achieve PV Tech's ModuleTech Bankability 'A' rating; the company also became the first in India to exceed 1 GW of module output in a single month (November 2025). On sheer manufacturing scale and institutional depth, Waaree now carries the larger footprint. Seraphim's current product lineup centers on N-type TOPCon modules from the Sable series, covering residential rooftop formats in the 440-455 W range and larger commercial or utility configurations up to around 620 W, plus the Hydra HJT series rated at 720 W with module efficiency up to 23.18%, aimed primarily at utility-scale and C&I rooftop projects. Waaree's portfolio spans comparable TOPCon and HJT technologies in the 415-445 W range for residential applications, reaching efficiency up to 22.79%, and is backed by a 12-year product warranty alongside a 30-year performance guarantee promising at least 87.4% of initial rated power at year 30. Both manufacturers serve the full spectrum from residential rooftop through large ground-mount farms, though Waaree is placing increasing emphasis on utility and EPC contracting, with explicit plans to scale European operations under the EU's Net-Zero Industry Act from 2026 onward. For a typical international buyer - whether a residential installer or a utility developer - both brands represent bankable, well-resourced choices that are difficult to separate on day-to-day panel performance. Waaree's greater manufacturing scale, US domestic production capacity, and aggressive European expansion give it a practical edge for buyers concerned with supply-chain resilience or projects subject to domestic-content requirements. Seraphim's longer global track record, multi-continental manufacturing presence, and repeated PVEL recognition make it a well-proven alternative in markets where it is already established. Neither brand needs to be ruled out on bankability grounds; the decision should hinge on local availability, delivered price, and the quality of after-sales support in the target region. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Seraphim vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-waaree) - [Seraphim vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-waaree) - [Seraphim vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-waaree) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-waaree Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.