---
title: "Seraphim vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Seraphim vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Seraphim vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 160 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Seraphim | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changzhou | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2011 | 1997 |
| Employees | 1001-5000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 13 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Seraphim | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 160 | 340 | +180 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 549 W | 520 W | +29 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Seraphim | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 21.71% | +0.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Seraphim | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.316%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.014 |
| Bifacial Share | 111 (69%) | 145 (43%) | +27 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Seraphim | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 32 (20.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 58 (36.2%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 51 (31.9%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 19 (11.9%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | Seraphim | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.2%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 55 (34.4%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 47 (29.4%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 45 (28.1%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 11 (6.9%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Seraphim | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 84 (52.5%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| TOPCon | 66 (41.2%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| HJT | 6 (3.8%) | 0 |
| N-type | 4 (2.5%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Seraphim is a Chinese manufacturer formally established in 2011 under the name Jiangsu Seraphim Solar System Co., Ltd., headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company achieved Bloomberg New Energy Finance Tier 1 status in 2015 and has held it for eleven consecutive years, with cumulative module installations of approximately 30 GW across more than 100 countries by the end of 2023. Its current annual production capacity stands at around 13 GW, supported by manufacturing facilities in China, Vietnam, and South Africa - geographic diversification that carries practical relevance for buyers navigating trade policy risks. Trina Solar, also headquartered in Changzhou, was founded in 1997 and brings nearly three decades of industry history to the market. It achieved a 100 percent unanimous BNEF bankability rating for the eighth time in Q2 2025, shipped more than 292 GW of modules globally by mid-2025, and exceeded 32 GW in shipments in the first half of 2025 alone, with module production capacity approaching 120 GW. On every measure of institutional scale and track record, Trina Solar holds the stronger position.

Both manufacturers have fully committed to TOPCon cell technology. Seraphim's current lineup centers on the Nebula series for residential and commercial rooftop applications, reaching efficiency up to 22.5 percent, and the Sable series of 575-600 W bifacial dual-glass modules targeting utility-scale and commercial ground-mount projects. Seraphim panels are generally positioned at a 15-20 percent price discount relative to premium-tier brands, which makes them a credible option for cost-sensitive procurements that still require a bankable manufacturer. Trina Solar's product ladder is considerably broader: the Vertex S+ addresses residential rooftops with outputs around 480 W and includes hail-resistant variants, the Vertex N series serves commercial and utility-scale demand with outputs up to 725 W and efficiencies above 23 percent, and the i-TOPCon Ultra generation has reached 740 W in mass production with efficiency records approaching 24.5 percent on select formats.

For most international buyers - whether financing a utility-scale project or sourcing panels for a commercial rooftop - Trina Solar is the more straightforward default: its scale, eleven consecutive years of PVEL Top Performer recognition, unanimous BNEF bankability, and breadth of product options collectively reduce procurement and long-term performance risk. Seraphim is a legitimate alternative rather than a fallback, particularly where budget pressure is real and a Tier 1-rated manufacturer at a lower price point meets the project brief. For standard residential and mid-size commercial installations the two brands are closer to interchangeable, and the decision often comes down to local distributor pricing and availability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Seraphim vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Seraphim vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Seraphim vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.