---
title: "Seraphim vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Seraphim vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-aeet"
---

# Seraphim vs AEET

Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 5 models). Seraphim leads on peak efficiency at 23.50%. Seraphim leans bifacial (69% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Seraphim | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Changzhou |  |
| Founded | 2011 |  |
| Employees | 1001-5000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 13 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |  |

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Seraphim | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 160 | 5 | +155 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 200 W | +530 W |
| Avg Power | 549 W | 190 W | +359 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Seraphim | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 15.70% | +7.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 14.90% | +6.92 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Seraphim | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.316%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 111 (69%) | 0 (0%) | +69 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 28.8 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +3.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Seraphim skews to higher efficiency: 12% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Seraphim | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 32 (20.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 58 (36.2%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 51 (31.9%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 19 (11.9%) | 0 |
| \<20% | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Power distribution

Seraphim offers more 600W+ panels (35% of lineup)


| Power band | Seraphim | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 2 (1.2%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 55 (34.4%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 47 (29.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 45 (28.1%) | 0 |
| 700W+ | 11 (6.9%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (52%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Seraphim | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 84 (52.5%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| TOPCon | 66 (41.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 6 (3.8%) | 0 |
| N-type | 4 (2.5%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Seraphim is a Chinese manufacturer - formally Jiangsu Seraphim Solar Systems Co., Ltd. - founded in 2011 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province. The company has held Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF) Tier 1 status for eleven consecutive years and has grown its annual production capacity to approximately 13 GW, with panels installed across more than 100 countries. AEET Energy Group GmbH, by contrast, is a German photovoltaic wholesale distributor and systems specialist based in Bad Gandersheim, founded around 2004. It is not itself a panel manufacturer but rather a trade and service partner that sources modules from leading third-party producers - making a direct head-to-head comparison unusual. On institutional footprint and independent manufacturing scale, Seraphim holds the decisively stronger position.

Seraphim's product portfolio is built around mainstream residential and commercial rooftop applications, with confirmed TOPCon and HJT cell technologies and power outputs spanning roughly 390 W to 670 W. The range targets buyers who want near-premium efficiency - up to approximately 22.5% - at pricing that sits noticeably below the top-tier brands. AEET Energy Group's offering depends on which brands it carries at any given time; historically the company has stocked modules from suppliers such as Upsolar alongside storage and inverter products, and its value proposition is the convenience of a full-system, single-source supply chain backed by a network of more than 500 certified installer partners across Germany.

For a buyer comparing the two in 2025, the choice comes down to what is actually being purchased. Seraphim delivers a well-documented, BNEF-bankable panel with a traceable warranty chain and a confirmed technology roadmap. AEET is better understood as a regional distribution and installation channel than as a competing module brand, so specifying it at project level makes sense only when procuring through the German trade market and relying on its service network - not as an equivalent alternative to a vertically integrated manufacturer like Seraphim.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/reviewing-seraphim-solar-panels \| Seraphim Solar Panels Review - Are They A Good Brand? \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/seraphim-review.html \| Seraphim Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar \| article

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/seraphim-solar-panel-review-cater-to-any.html \| Seraphim solar panel review 2026 - A1 SolarStore \| review

Sources:

\- \[Seraphim Solar Panels Review - Are They A Good Brand?\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/reviewing-seraphim-solar-panels)

\- \[Seraphim Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/seraphim-review.html)

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet)

\- \[Seraphim solar panel review 2026 - A1 SolarStore\](https://a1solarstore.com/blog/seraphim-solar-panel-review-cater-to-any.html)

\- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - Your photovoltaic wholesale partner\](https://www.aeet-energy.com/en/index.php)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Seraphim vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [Seraphim vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [Seraphim vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/seraphim-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

