---
title: "SEG Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare SEG Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/seg-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# SEG Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | SEG Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | United States | China |
| Headquarters | Houston | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2016 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | 6+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.segsolar.com](https://www.segsolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

SEG Solar is a vertically integrated solar photovoltaic module manufacturer headquartered in Houston, Texas, with manufacturing operations in the USA and Indonesia. The company serves utility, commercial, and residential markets, and by end of 2024 had shipped over 6 GW of modules globally. SEG Solar is one of the few...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | SEG Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | SEG Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | SEG Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | SEG Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | SEG Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | SEG Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

SEG Solar is a US-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2016 and based in Houston, Texas, with Chinese-origin ownership and a growing commitment to domestic American production. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and by the end of 2025 had shipped over 7.5 GW of modules worldwide, with 2 GW of annual capacity at its Houston facility and announced plans to expand US manufacturing capacity beyond 10 GW across multiple factories. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, and has been among the most established names in global solar for nearly three decades. Trina has earned the BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation for multiple consecutive years and is the only manufacturer to have achieved a 100% bankability rating from BNEF eight times, alongside 11 consecutive years as a PVEL Top Performer. On institutional credibility and global track record, Trina Solar holds a considerably stronger position.

SEG Solar's current lineup centers on N-type TOPCon modules in 182 mm and 210 mm formats, targeting the US residential rooftop and commercial market. The YUKON N all-black series was ranked among the top ten panel brands in the US in 2025, with module efficiencies confirmed in the range of 21.48% to 23.14%. For US-based buyers, SEG Solar's domestically manufactured panels carry a meaningful advantage under the Inflation Reduction Act, making them especially attractive for projects requiring American-made content. Trina Solar's Vertex N family covers the full project spectrum using N-type TOPCon technology - from 495 W residential panels through 670 W commercial and industrial units to flagship utility modules reaching 760 W with a confirmed conversion efficiency of 24.5%. Trina backs its flagship products with 30-year performance warranties and has received an AA rating from TUV Rheinland for supply chain traceability across the full polysilicon-to-module chain.

For international buyers outside the United States who prioritize deep bankability, a long commercial track record, and broad installer familiarity, Trina Solar is the stronger default. SEG Solar is a credible and competitively positioned alternative, but its primary differentiator - US domestic manufacturing - is most relevant to buyers operating under US policy incentives. The two brands are not interchangeable on a global scale; within the US residential and C&I segment they compete directly, but Trina Solar's institutional footprint gives it a clear edge in most other markets.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [SEG Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/seg-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [SEG Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/seg-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [SEG Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/seg-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/seg-solar-vs-trina-solar