---
title: "Runtech China vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runtech China vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Runtech China vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 21 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runtech China | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Xi'an | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 1997 |
| Employees | 50+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.runtechenergy.com](http://www.runtechenergy.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Runtech Energy, founded in 2008, is a leading independent solar production supplier and designer. They are a trader of solar modules and PV project developer, with over 500MW of premium quality modules deployed worldwide. Runtech is committed to providing high-quality solar products and system integration services.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runtech China | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 21 | 340 | +319 |
| Max Power | 420 W | 760 W | +340 W |
| Avg Power | 301 W | 520 W | +219 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runtech China | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 24.80% | +0.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.59% | 21.71% | +3.13 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runtech China | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.350%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.048 |
| Bifacial Share | 1 (5%) | 145 (43%) | +38 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runtech China | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (61.9%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (19.0%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (14.3%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 23%+ | 1 (4.8%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Runtech China | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (76.2%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 5 (23.8%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Runtech China | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 21 (100.0%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Runtech China


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RT420WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt420wm) | 420 | 21.6 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RT415WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt415wm) | 415 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RT410WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt410wm) | 410 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RT405WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt405wm) | 405 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RT400WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt400wm) | 400 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RT395WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt395wm) | 395 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RT390WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt390wm) | 390 | 20.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RT-355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 9 | [RT 355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m-1) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 10 | [RT-350M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-350m) | 350 | 18.0 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runtech China is a Chinese company based in Xi'an, with operations established around 2008-2014 and a facility in Changzhou, Jiangsu province. A critical distinction is that Runtech China operates primarily as a trading company and systems integrator - it resells and distributes modules from established manufacturers such as Trina Solar, LONGi, JA Solar, Canadian Solar, and Jinko, rather than manufacturing its own panels at scale. Total deployed volume stands at roughly 400 MW globally, with around 100 MW of solar plants built annually in China. Runtech does not appear on any BloombergNEF Tier 1 list as an independent manufacturer. Trina Solar, by contrast, is one of the world's largest and longest-established solar manufacturers, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China. Trina has been continuously recognized on the BNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer list - most recently confirmed in Q1 2025 - and was also included in S&P Global Commodity Insights' inaugural Tier 1 Cleantech Companies list for both PV modules and energy storage. Module production capacity reached 95 GW in 2023, with a stated target of 120 GW annually by end of 2025. In terms of institutional footprint and verified scale, Trina Solar holds an overwhelming advantage.

Runtech China, as a distributor-integrator, can in principle source from a broad mix of brands, which may offer flexibility for smaller projects or buyers seeking multi-brand procurement. However, because the company does not manufacture its own modules under a verified technology stack, its offering cannot be meaningfully benchmarked as a product brand. Trina Solar offers a clearly defined, multi-segment product lineup. The Vertex S+ series (n-type TOPCon) targets residential and C&I rooftop applications - the latest G3 generation reaches up to 485 W at 24.3% efficiency, with full-black and hail-resistant variants. The larger-format Vertex series is aimed at utility-scale and ground-mount projects. By June 2025, Trina's cumulative 210 mm module shipments had surpassed 200 GW, making it the global leader in that format. These products carry well-documented performance warranties backed by a manufacturer of significant financial scale.

For a typical international buyer evaluating these two names side by side, the comparison is fundamentally asymmetric. Trina Solar is a vertically integrated Tier 1 manufacturer with verified production scale, bankability recognition, and a comprehensive product roadmap. Runtech China is best understood as a procurement channel, not a competing panel brand. If a buyer's goal is sourcing Tier 1 modules with clear warranty backing and a transparent technology pedigree, Trina Solar is the default choice; Runtech China may serve as a supplementary sourcing partner but should not be treated as an equivalent manufacturer.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runtech China vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Runtech China vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Runtech China vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.