---
title: "Runtech China vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runtech China vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-akcome"
---

# Runtech China vs AKCOME

Runtech China has the broader catalog (21 vs 3 models). Runtech China leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runtech China | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Xi'an | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 2003 |
| Employees | 50+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.runtechenergy.com](http://www.runtechenergy.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

Runtech Energy, founded in 2008, is a leading independent solar production supplier and designer. They are a trader of solar modules and PV project developer, with over 500MW of premium quality modules deployed worldwide. Runtech is committed to providing high-quality solar products and system integration services.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runtech China | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 21 | 3 | +18 |
| Max Power | 420 W | 700 W | +280 W |
| Avg Power | 301 W | 672 W | +371 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runtech China | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 22.54% | +1.76 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.59% | 21.63% | +3.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runtech China | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.350%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.110 |
| Bifacial Share | 1 (5%) | 3 (100%) | +95 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +5.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runtech China skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runtech China | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (61.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 4 (19.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (14.3%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 23%+ | 1 (4.8%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Runtech China | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (76.2%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 5 (23.8%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | Runtech China | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 21 (100.0%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Runtech China


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RT420WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt420wm) | 420 | 21.6 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RT415WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt415wm) | 415 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RT410WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt410wm) | 410 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RT405WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt405wm) | 405 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RT400WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt400wm) | 400 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RT395WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt395wm) | 395 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RT390WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt390wm) | 390 | 20.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RT-355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 9 | [RT 355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m-1) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 10 | [RT-350M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-350m) | 350 | 18.0 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang Province, founded in 2006 under the full corporate name Zhejiang Akcome New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. At its peak it claimed roughly 3.8 GW of annual module production capacity and appeared on BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability evaluation lists through early 2024. However, its financial position deteriorated sharply: the company reported net losses every year from 2019 onward, a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024, and the Shenzhen Stock Exchange terminated AKCOME's listing that same year after its shares collapsed below the minimum threshold. Runtech China Co., Ltd. is a much smaller operation based in Changzhou City, Jiangsu Province, active since approximately 2014. It combines a modest OEM/ODM module manufacturing line - reported annual own-production capacity of around 200 MW - with a trading and distribution role, reselling modules from established brands such as LONGi, Trina, Canadian Solar, JA, and Jinko. Runtech holds no independent BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation of its own. On institutional footprint and manufacturing scale, AKCOME historically had the larger presence, though its current operational status is severely compromised.

AKCOME's product line was built around higher-wattage crystalline modules, and the company publicly committed to both TOPCon and HJT cell technologies before its financial crisis. By early 2025, industry module-tracking databases began delisting AKCOME products due to the company's inaccessible website and halted production lines, making current availability unreliable. Runtech China covers a wide wattage range in its own-branded modules - roughly 5 W through 600 W - which positions them for small off-grid systems, rural electrification, and budget commercial rooftop projects. In parallel, Runtech also supplies utility-grade ground-mount projects by sourcing modules from Tier 1 principals, effectively acting as a system integrator and reseller rather than a technology innovator.

For a typical buyer in 2025, neither brand represents a straightforward recommendation. AKCOME's manufacturing future remains uncertain following its stock delisting and subsidiary bankruptcy, which create serious warranty and after-sales support risk regardless of past Tier 1 status. Runtech China's own manufacturing base is too small to serve large-scale utility or commercial procurement, and its Tier 1 module offering is simply a pass-through of other brands. Buyers seeking bankable, warranty-backed panels at competitive prices would be better served by sourcing directly from the established manufacturers whose modules Runtech distributes.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces Chinese stock delisting - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/ \| AKCOME Technologies on HJT cell production and copper plating - PV Tech \| article

\- https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity \| AKCOME subsidiary declares bankruptcy amid plunging prices - OE Digital \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/runtech-china \| Runtech China Co. Ltd profile - ENF Solar Directory \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| AKCOME solar panels independent review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

Sources:

\- \[AKCOME halts manufacturing, faces Chinese stock delisting - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/)

\- \[AKCOME Technologies on HJT cell production - PV Tech\](https://www.pv-tech.org/akcome-technologies-on-hjt-cell-production/)

\- \[AKCOME subsidiary declares bankruptcy - OE Digital\](https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity)

\- \[Runtech China Co. Ltd profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/runtech-china)

\- \[AKCOME solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runtech China vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [Runtech China vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [Runtech China vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.