---
title: "Runtech China vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runtech China vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-aeet"
---

# Runtech China vs AEET

Runtech China has the broader catalog (21 vs 5 models). Runtech China leads on peak efficiency at 24.30%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runtech China | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China |  |
| Headquarters | Xi'an |  |
| Founded | 2008 |  |
| Employees | 50+ |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.runtechenergy.com](http://www.runtechenergy.com) |  |

Runtech Energy, founded in 2008, is a leading independent solar production supplier and designer. They are a trader of solar modules and PV project developer, with over 500MW of premium quality modules deployed worldwide. Runtech is committed to providing high-quality solar products and system integration services.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runtech China | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 21 | 5 | +16 |
| Max Power | 420 W | 200 W | +220 W |
| Avg Power | 301 W | 190 W | +111 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runtech China | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 15.70% | +8.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.59% | 14.90% | +3.69 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runtech China | AEET | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.350%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 1 (5%) | 0 (0%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Runtech China skews to higher efficiency: 5% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runtech China | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 13 (61.9%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 20-21% | 4 (19.0%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 3 (14.3%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 1 (4.8%) | 0 |


## Power distribution


| Power band | Runtech China | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (76.2%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 400-499W | 5 (23.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Runtech China | AEET |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 21 (100.0%) | 0 |
| PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Runtech China


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RT420WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt420wm) | 420 | 21.6 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RT415WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt415wm) | 415 | 21.3 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RT410WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt410wm) | 410 | 21.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RT405WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt405wm) | 405 | 20.8 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RT400WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt400wm) | 400 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RT395WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt395wm) | 395 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RT390WM](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt390wm) | 390 | 20.0 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RT-355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 9 | [RT 355M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-355m-1) | 355 | 18.5 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |
| 10 | [RT-350M](https://comparepv.com/panel/runtech-china-rt-350m) | 350 | 18.0 | -0.410 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, AEET


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runtech China is a small-scale solar module supplier based in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, China, operating since approximately 2014. The company functions simultaneously as a limited-volume manufacturer - with a self-reported annual production capacity of around 200 MW - and as a trading intermediary that resells modules from better-known Chinese brands such as LONGi and Canadian Solar under its own commercial umbrella. It does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list as an independent manufacturer, and its bankability rests almost entirely on the underlying brands it distributes rather than on its own production standing. AEET Energy Group GmbH, by contrast, is a Germany-based photovoltaic wholesale distributor and full-service installation company headquartered in Bad Gandersheim, Lower Saxony. AEET serves a network of more than 500 certified specialist partners across Germany, holds TUV Rheinland certifications, and positions itself as a one-stop procurement channel for European installers. Neither company qualifies as a primary panel manufacturer in the traditional sense, though AEET's European legal structure, warehouse logistics, and service infrastructure give it the stronger institutional footprint for buyers operating within the EU.

Because Runtech China's ENF Solar listings include datasheets for third-party modules - covering monocrystalline products sourced from Tier 1 Chinese suppliers alongside its own production - its effective catalog is broader than its in-house manufacturing line would suggest. The directly manufactured Runtech modules appear oriented toward small off-grid and budget commercial applications across a wide wattage range. AEET, acting purely as a wholesale partner rather than a manufacturer, sources modules from multiple leading producers and emphasizes rapid delivery from its European warehouse, making it a natural fit for residential and light-commercial installers in Germany and neighboring markets who need procurement flexibility and local after-sales coordination.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AEET Energy Group is the more predictable choice for European projects where local service continuity matters, while Runtech China may appeal to cost-sensitive buyers in markets accustomed to sourcing direct from China - provided they verify which underlying module brand is actually being supplied. The two companies are not directly comparable as competing manufacturers; they are region-specific distribution and service businesses that happen to overlap in product categories, making their suitability almost entirely dependent on geography and project scale.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/runtech-china \| Runtech China Co.,Ltd - ENF Solar company profile \| review

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar company profile \| review

\- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal buyer guide entry \| review

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runtech China vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet)
- [Runtech China vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-aiko)
- [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet)
- [Runtech China vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runtech-china-vs-aeet

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.