--- title: "Runergy vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Runergy vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-yingli" image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/runergy/yingli.png" --- # Runergy vs Yingli Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 124 models). Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Runergy | Yingli | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | China | | Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Baoding, Hebei | | Founded | 2013 | 1998 | | Employees | 15,000 | 9000+ | | Annual capacity | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year | 2.45 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | | OTC Pink: YGEHY | | Website | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) | Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production... Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all. ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Runergy | Yingli | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 124 | 196 | +72 | | Max Power | 740 W | 735 W | +5 W | | Avg Power | 579 W | 524 W | +55 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Runergy | Yingli | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 24.10% | | | Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 21.28% | +1.14 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Runergy | Yingli | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.298%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.032 | | Bifacial Share | 95 (77%) | 112 (57%) | +19 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +1.2 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Runergy | Yingli | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 9 (7.3%) | 39 (19.9%) | | 21-22% | 26 (21.0%) | 42 (21.4%) | | 22-23% | 48 (38.7%) | 44 (22.4%) | | 23%+ | 41 (33.1%) | 41 (20.9%) | | \<20% | 0 | 30 (15.3%) | ## Power distribution Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup) | Power band | Runergy | Yingli | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 36 (29.0%) | 52 (26.5%) | | 500-599W | 28 (22.6%) | 39 (19.9%) | | 600-699W | 35 (28.2%) | 62 (31.6%) | | 700W+ | 25 (20.2%) | 11 (5.6%) | | \<400W | 0 | 32 (16.3%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%) Dominant cell tech: PERC (32%) | Technology | Runergy | Yingli | | --- | --- | --- | | N-type | 74 (59.7%) | 59 (30.1%) | | PERC | 32 (25.8%) | 63 (32.1%) | | HJT | 18 (14.5%) | 0 | | TOPCon | 0 | 54 (27.6%) | | Unknown | 0 | 20 (10.2%) | ## Top panels, Runergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Yingli | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Runergy is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu Province that started as a dedicated solar cell specialist before expanding into full module production. The company secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status for six consecutive quarters beginning in 2023, and by end of 2024 had built roughly 63 GW of global high-efficiency cell capacity alongside approximately 23 GW of planned module capacity, with production sites spanning China, Thailand, Vietnam, and a 2 GW module plant in Huntsville, Alabama. Yingli Green Energy, also Chinese and headquartered in Baoding, was founded in 1998 and once ranked among the world's largest solar suppliers before a prolonged financial crisis from around 2015 to 2020 brought it close to collapse; following restructuring the company has regained BNEF Tier 1 status and reports module production capacity in the range of 4 to 7.2 GW, with cumulative shipments exceeding 24 GW to more than 100 countries. On current production scale and institutional momentum, Runergy holds the stronger footprint by a clear margin. Runergy centers its portfolio on n-type TOPCon modules - its third-generation TOPCon cells achieved a verified cell conversion efficiency of 26.9% certified by Germany's Fraunhofer ISFH - while running parallel R&D programs in HJT, back-contact, and perovskite-silicon tandem architectures. Its product range covers residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and large utility-scale ground-mount segments. Yingli's current lineup is organized around two main families: the PANDA 3.0 series, a bifacial n-type TOPCon line suited to both residential and commercial rooftop applications, and the YLM 3.0 series, a p-type PERC half-cell range targeting mainstream residential and small commercial projects at more accessible price points. Both manufacturers therefore address the full spectrum from rooftop to utility scale, though Runergy's dedicated R&D investment - exceeding USD 60 million with a 698-member research team - and its US domestic manufacturing capacity give it added relevance for buyers facing tariff or local-content requirements. For most international buyers, Runergy is the more straightforward default today: its six-quarter Tier 1 streak, substantial global cell capacity, and verified TOPCon efficiency leadership make it the technically stronger option, and its American manufacturing plant directly addresses supply-chain concerns for North American projects. Yingli remains a credible and bankable choice - particularly for buyers who value a brand with nearly three decades of cumulative shipment data and established durability records across diverse climates - but its recovery is relatively recent and its production scale is more modest. The two brands are not truly interchangeable at the top of the market; Runergy currently holds a clear edge on technology depth, manufacturing scale, and geographic diversification. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Runergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli) - [Runergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli) - [Runergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-akcome) - [APsystems vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/apsystems-vs-yingli) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-yingli Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.