--- title: "Runergy vs Waaree - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare Runergy vs Waaree solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-waaree" --- # Runergy vs Waaree Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 124 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | Runergy | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | China | India | | Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Mumbai | | Founded | 2013 | 1990 | | Employees | 15,000 | 8500+ | | Annual capacity | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year | 13.3 GW/year | | Tier 1 | yes | yes | | Listed | | NSE: WAAREEENER | | Website | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) | Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production... Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC... ## Catalog & Power | Measure | Runergy | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 124 | 222 | +98 | | Max Power | 740 W | 730 W | +10 W | | Avg Power | 579 W | 371 W | +208 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | Runergy | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 23.51% | +0.59 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 18.39% | +4.03 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | Runergy | Waaree | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.298%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.064 | | Bifacial Share | 95 (77%) | 85 (38%) | +38 pp | | Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 21.7 yrs | +7.4 yr | ## Efficiency distribution Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+ | Efficiency band | Runergy | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | 20-21% | 9 (7.3%) | 47 (21.2%) | | 21-22% | 26 (21.0%) | 14 (6.3%) | | 22-23% | 48 (38.7%) | 13 (5.9%) | | 23%+ | 41 (33.1%) | 9 (4.1%) | | \<20% | 0 | 139 (62.6%) | ## Power distribution Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup) | Power band | Runergy | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | 400-499W | 36 (29.0%) | 35 (15.8%) | | 500-599W | 28 (22.6%) | 36 (16.2%) | | 600-699W | 35 (28.2%) | 20 (9.0%) | | 700W+ | 25 (20.2%) | 7 (3.2%) | | \<400W | 0 | 124 (55.9%) | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%) | Technology | Runergy | Waaree | | --- | --- | --- | | N-type | 74 (59.7%) | 8 (3.6%) | | PERC | 32 (25.8%) | 107 (48.2%) | | HJT | 18 (14.5%) | 7 (3.2%) | | Unknown | 0 | 88 (39.6%) | | TOPCon | 0 | 12 (5.4%) | ## Top panels, Runergy | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, Waaree | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline | ## Summary Runergy is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Yancheng, Jiangsu province, founded in 2013 with an initial focus on solar cell production. The company ranked among the global top three in cell shipments for three consecutive years and has since expanded into module manufacturing, reporting a combined global cell capacity approaching 63 GW and approximately 21 GW of annual module output as of early 2025. Runergy has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for six consecutive quarters and recently opened a 2 GW module facility in Huntsville, Alabama. Waaree Energies is India's largest solar module manufacturer, founded in 1989 as a diversified industrial group and entering solar module manufacturing in 2007, with its headquarters in Mumbai. By late 2025, the company had lifted its global module capacity to 22.3 GW across sites in India and the United States and crossed the milestone of 1 GW of monthly production. Waaree is a consistent BNEF Tier 1 name and became the first Indian manufacturer to earn PV Tech's "A" bankability rating - a distinction that carries significant weight with project lenders. On institutional recognition, Waaree holds a modest but meaningful advantage. Runergy's commercial lineup is anchored in N-type TOPCon bifacial modules, a direct outgrowth of its cell expertise. Its TOPCon cells achieve mass-production efficiencies averaging around 25 to 25.5 percent, and the company set a publicly verified world record of 26.55 percent for a full-area N-type cell, independently confirmed by Germany's ISFH institute. A PERC-based module range also serves cost-sensitive residential and smaller commercial applications. Waaree's portfolio is broader in technology terms, covering Mono PERC, N-type TOPCon, and HJT bifacial lines including the Plexus dual-glass series rated at approximately 22.9 percent module efficiency. That breadth positions Waaree across residential rooftop, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount segments without requiring a second supplier. For most international buyers, both manufacturers are credible Tier 1 choices and are broadly interchangeable on standard TOPCon bifacial projects. Runergy's depth in cell technology gives it a slight advantage for efficiency-focused utility developers. Waaree's non-Chinese production base reduces tariff exposure in EU and US markets, and its wider technology range adds sourcing flexibility. In practice, the deciding factor will typically be regional distributor availability and delivered cost. Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [Runergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-waaree) - [Runergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-aeet) - [AIKO vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-waaree) - [Runergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-akcome) - [ARTsolar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-waaree) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-waaree Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.