---
title: "Runergy vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runergy vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Runergy vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 124 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runergy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2013 | 1997 |
| Employees | 15,000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runergy | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 124 | 340 | +216 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 760 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 579 W | 520 W | +59 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runergy | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 24.80% | +0.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 21.71% | +0.71 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runergy | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.298%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.003 |
| Bifacial Share | 95 (77%) | 145 (43%) | +34 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runergy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 9 (7.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 26 (21.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 48 (38.7%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 41 (33.1%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Runergy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 36 (29.0%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 28 (22.6%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 35 (28.2%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 25 (20.2%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Runergy | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 74 (59.7%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 32 (25.8%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| HJT | 18 (14.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runergy is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Yancheng, Jiangsu province, founded in 2013 as a solar cell specialist before expanding into module production. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - confirmed for six consecutive quarters - and by the end of 2024 reported a global high-efficiency cell capacity of 63 GW alongside 23 GW of planned module capacity. A U.S. manufacturing facility in Huntsville, Alabama opened in late 2024 with an annual capacity of 2 GW, reflecting the company's push into Western markets. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and based in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is one of the world's five largest module manufacturers by shipment volume, with 65.21 GW shipped in 2023 and 34 GW delivered in the first half of 2024 alone, against a production capacity exceeding 95 GW. Trina also maintains long-standing BloombergNEF Tier 1 recognition and a decades-long track record of project financing across multiple continents, giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint.

On the product side, Runergy offers N-type TOPCon and PERC-based modules, with its bifacial TOPCon panels reaching an efficiency of around 22.5 percent. The company was named a Top Performer in Kiwa PVEL's 2024 PV Module Reliability Scorecard, and its N-type modules ranked first for energy yield in a pv-magazine bifacial performance test - meaningful third-party validation for procurement teams. Trina Solar's primary lineup centers on the Vertex series: the Vertex S+ targets residential rooftop installations with outputs above 435 W, while the Vertex N addresses commercial, industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount projects, with TOPCon cells delivering efficiencies up to 23.2 percent and peak outputs reaching 720 W. Trina's product range covers every market segment coherently, from small rooftop arrays to large-scale solar farms.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default: its decades of operational history, production scale, and depth of bankable project references reduce friction with lenders and independent engineers. Runergy is a credible, performance-validated alternative - particularly compelling for buyers who prioritize cell-quality pedigree or require domestically manufactured U.S. modules to meet content requirements. In utility procurement and structured project finance, Trina's scale tips the balance, but verified module quality between the two brands is closer than their respective market profiles might suggest.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Runergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Runergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.