---
title: "Runergy vs Solarspace - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runergy vs Solarspace solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-solarspace"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/runergy/solarspace.png"
---

# Runergy vs Solarspace

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 82 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Solarspace leans bifacial (93% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runergy | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Xuzhou |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
| Employees | 15,000 | 6000+ |
| Annual capacity | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year | 60+ GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | [https://solarspace.com](https://solarspace.com) |

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

SolarSpace is a world-leading solar cell and module manufacturer, focusing on high-efficiency solar technology production both in China and overseas. They are among the top solar cell manufacturers, providing high-quality solar modules with core cell technology worldwide. SolarSpace is dedicated to empowering solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runergy | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 124 | 82 | +42 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 710 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 579 W | 539 W | +40 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runergy | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 23.16% | +0.94 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 22.04% | +0.38 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runergy | Solarspace | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.298%/°C | -0.299%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 95 (77%) | 76 (93%) | +16 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 29.6 yrs | +0.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runergy | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 9 (7.3%) | 7 (8.5%) |
| 21-22% | 26 (21.0%) | 26 (31.7%) |
| 22-23% | 48 (38.7%) | 46 (56.1%) |
| 23%+ | 41 (33.1%) | 3 (3.7%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Runergy | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 36 (29.0%) | 35 (42.7%) |
| 500-599W | 28 (22.6%) | 19 (23.2%) |
| 600-699W | 35 (28.2%) | 24 (29.3%) |
| 700W+ | 25 (20.2%) | 3 (3.7%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 1 (1.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%)

Dominant cell tech: N-type (70%)


| Technology | Runergy | Solarspace |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 74 (59.7%) | 57 (69.5%) |
| PERC | 32 (25.8%) | 18 (22.0%) |
| HJT | 18 (14.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 0 | 7 (8.5%) |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarspace


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SS9-66HD-710N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-710n) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SS9-66HD-705N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-705n) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SS9-66HD-700N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-700n) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SS9-66HD-695N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-695n) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SS9-66HD-690N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-690n) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SS9-66HD-685N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-685n) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SS9-66HD-680N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-680n) | 680 | 21.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SS9-66HD-675N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-675n) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SS9-66HD-670M](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670m) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.330 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SS9-66HD-670N](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarspace-ss9-66hd-670n) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced information now.

Runergy is a Chinese solar manufacturer headquartered in Jiangsu, with additional production facilities in Thailand, Vietnam and the United States. It has been recognized by BloombergNEF as a Tier 1 PV module manufacturer for six consecutive quarters through Q1 2025, and by the end of 2023 the company had shipped over 65 GW of solar cells, indicating substantial upstream cell-manufacturing scale. Solarspace has also appeared on BNEF's Tier 1 list, rejoining it in Q2 2024 after a prior absence, and operates six manufacturing bases across Cambodia, Laos and China with a global sales network spanning the Americas, Europe, Asia, Australia and the Middle East. Runergy's longer, uninterrupted Tier 1 streak and its large cell-shipment volume suggest a somewhat stronger and more consistent institutional footprint than Solarspace, whose Tier 1 status has been less continuous.

Both brands center their product lines on n-type TOPCon technology. Runergy markets bifacial dual-glass TOPCon modules such as the HY-DH144N8 for utility-scale ground-mount projects, alongside all-black TOPCon modules like the HY-DH108N8B aimed at residential and commercial rooftops; its latest TOPCon 3.0 cells have reached certified efficiencies above 26 percent, verified by Fraunhofer ISE. Solarspace's panels span a wide power range, roughly 400 to 720 watts, with efficiencies cited between 20 and 23 percent, positioning the brand in the medium price segment and covering both rooftop and larger installations; its modules have also received independent testing endorsements from RETC and PVEL. Solarspace's warranty terms are reported as relatively short, around 12 to 15 years, which buyers should weigh against typical industry norms of 25 to 30 years.

For a typical 2025 buyer prioritizing bankability and continuous Tier 1 standing, Runergy currently presents the stronger default choice, backed by its longer unbroken BNEF streak and high-efficiency TOPCon 3.0 technology. Solarspace remains a credible Tier 1 alternative, particularly where its RETC/PVEL-tested products and wide power range fit the project, but its shorter warranty and less continuous Tier 1 history warrant closer due diligence.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/runergy-ranked-as-a-bloombergnef-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-301998949.html \| Runergy ranked as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/runergy-introduces-topcon-cell-with-269-conversion-efficiency \| Runergy introduces TOPCon cell with 26.9% conversion efficiency \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/runergys-topcon-3-0-solar-modules-25-9-conversion-efficiency/ \| Runergy's TOPCon 3.0 solar modules certified at 25.9% efficiency \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/solarspace-rejoins-bnef-tier-1-list-for-q2-2024/ \| Solarspace rejoins BNEF Tier 1 list for Q2 2024 \| article

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/solarspace-solar-panels-review-in-depth-look-a1-solarstore.html \| Solarspace solar panels review: an in-depth look \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarspace)
- [Runergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarspace)
- [Runergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solarspace](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solarspace)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-solarspace

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.