---
title: "Runergy vs Seraphim - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runergy vs Seraphim solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-seraphim"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/runergy/seraphim.png"
---

# Runergy vs Seraphim

Seraphim has the broader catalog (160 vs 124 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runergy | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
| Employees | 15,000 | 1001-5000 |
| Annual capacity | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year | 13 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) | [https://www.seraphim-energy.com](https://www.seraphim-energy.com) |

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...

Seraphim is a world-class solar products manufacturer specializing in research, development, production, and sales of solar PV products. The company has achieved significant milestones, outpacing competitors in production capacity and innovative designs. Seraphim is committed to technological innovation and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runergy | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 124 | 160 | +36 |
| Max Power | 740 W | 730 W | +10 W |
| Avg Power | 579 W | 549 W | +30 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runergy | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.10% | 23.50% | +0.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.42% | 21.82% | +0.60 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runergy | Seraphim | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.298%/°C | -0.316%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 95 (77%) | 111 (69%) | +7 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.8 yrs | +0.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runergy | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 9 (7.3%) | 32 (20.0%) |
| 21-22% | 26 (21.0%) | 58 (36.2%) |
| 22-23% | 48 (38.7%) | 51 (31.9%) |
| 23%+ | 41 (33.1%) | 19 (11.9%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Runergy | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 36 (29.0%) | 55 (34.4%) |
| 500-599W | 28 (22.6%) | 47 (29.4%) |
| 600-699W | 35 (28.2%) | 45 (28.1%) |
| 700W+ | 25 (20.2%) | 11 (6.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%)

Dominant cell tech: PERC (52%)


| Technology | Runergy | Seraphim |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 74 (59.7%) | 4 (2.5%) |
| PERC | 32 (25.8%) | 84 (52.5%) |
| HJT | 18 (14.5%) | 6 (3.8%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 66 (41.2%) |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Seraphim


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SRP-730-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-730-bhc-bg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SRP-725-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-725-bhc-bg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SRP-720-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-bhc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SRP-720-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-720-btc-bg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SRP-715-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-bhc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SRP-715-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-715-btc-bg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SRP-710-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-bhc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SRP-710-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-710-btc-bg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SRP-705-BHC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-bhc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.258 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SRP-705-BTC-BG](https://comparepv.com/panel/seraphim-srp-705-btc-bg) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runergy is a Chinese solar module manufacturer based in Jiangsu, part of the broader Runergy Group, that has built its reputation around N-type cell technology and has repeatedly secured BloombergNEF Tier 1 status, including six consecutive quarters through early 2025, reflecting strong bankability with commercial lenders. The company has also expanded manufacturing into the United States, with a module facility in Huntsville, Alabama, alongside its large-scale Chinese cell and module capacity. Seraphim, also headquartered in China, has held BNEF Tier 1 status for even longer, having first earned the designation in 2015 and maintained it for multiple consecutive years, giving it one of the more established bankability track records among mid-tier Chinese manufacturers, though its production footprint is comparatively smaller than top-tier giants. On institutional footprint, Runergy currently presents a larger and more actively expanding manufacturing base, while Seraphim's advantage lies in the longevity of its Tier 1 record.

Runergy's product range leans heavily on N-type TOPCon cells, which make up the bulk of its portfolio alongside smaller PERC and HJT shares, with panels spanning roughly 425W to 740W suited to residential, commercial and utility-scale projects, and independent testing has placed some of its N-type modules near the top of performance rankings. Seraphim's lineup is more mixed, with TOPCon, PERC and a small HJT share; its Nebula series targets higher-efficiency bifacial applications around 22.5 percent efficiency, while the Sable and S-series cover standard residential and value-oriented commercial installs, generally positioned as a budget-to-midrange alternative to premium brands.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Runergy looks like the stronger choice where cutting-edge N-type efficiency and a growing US-based supply chain matter, while Seraphim remains a reasonable, cost-conscious Tier 1 option for standard residential or commercial rooftops where absolute peak efficiency is less critical. Neither is a top-tier global leader like Longi or Trina, but both offer credible bankable coverage for mainstream projects.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/runergy-ranked-as-a-bloombergnef-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-301998949.html \| Runergy Ranked as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/runergy-develops-26-55-efficient-m10-topcon-solar-cell/ \| Runergy develops 26.55% efficient M10 TOPCon solar cell \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/seraphim-review.html \| Seraphim Solar Panels Review \| review

\- https://saegroup.com.au/blog/seraphim-tier-1-classification/ \| Seraphim Awarded Prestigious Tier 1 Classification \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runergy vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-seraphim)
- [Runergy vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-seraphim)
- [Runergy vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Seraphim](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-seraphim)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runergy-vs-seraphim

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.