---
title: "Runda Solar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runda Solar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Runda Solar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 6 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Runda Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runda Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2009 | 1997 |
| Employees | 800+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 4GW (modules), 8GW (cells), 1GWh (energy storage) GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | NEEQ (National Equities Exchange and Quotations): 832391 |  |
| Website | http://www.rundaenergy.com/ (redirects to https://www.rundapv.com/) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Runda Solar (Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd.) is a high-tech company dedicated to manufacturing world-class solar photovoltaic modules. The company's business covers the entire photovoltaic industry chain, including R&D, production, and sales of PV modules, as well as energy storage and smart grid solutions. Runda Solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runda Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 6 | 340 | +334 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 718 W | 520 W | +197 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runda Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 24.80% | +1.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.10% | 21.71% | +1.39 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runda Solar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.310%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 6 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runda Solar skews to higher efficiency: 67% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runda Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 2 (33.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (66.7%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |


## Power distribution

Runda Solar offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Runda Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 700W+ | 6 (100.0%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Runda Solar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 6 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Runda Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RS730S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs730s9-132gant) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RS725S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs725s9-132gant) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RS720S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs720s9-132gant) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RS715S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs715s9-132gant) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RS710S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs710s9-132gant) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RS705S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs705s9-132gant) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runda Solar, incorporated as Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. Listed on China's National Equities Exchange and Quotations since 2015, the company employs roughly 800 people and reports an annual module production capacity of approximately 4 GW. Runda holds standard international certifications including TUV, CE, ISO9001, and IEC61215, and operates a logistics warehouse in Rotterdam to support European distribution across markets such as Germany, Spain, Greece, and Bulgaria. However, Runda does not appear on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, which materially limits its suitability for project-financed developments. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 by Jifan Gao in Changzhou, Jiangsu, is a different order of magnitude: it is consistently ranked as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer - including Q1 and Q2 2025 - with annual production capacity of around 100 GW and cumulative shipments exceeding 205 GW across more than 100 countries. By any institutional metric, Trina's footprint vastly outweighs Runda's.

Runda's product range covers N-type TOPCon modules including bifacial variants, alongside PERC and HJT technologies, addressing residential rooftop, commercial and industrial (C&I) distributed, and utility-scale ground-mount segments. The company also offers flexible modules suited to building-integrated or curved-surface applications. Trina Solar's flagship Vertex series is built on N-type TOPCon technology and spans all three major market segments - residential, C&I, and large utility-scale. Module efficiency across the Vertex range is reported at roughly 19.2% to 22.5%, and the company holds over 30 world records in cell efficiency research. The Trina Storage division has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 energy storage recognition for eight consecutive quarters through late 2025, offering a credible integrated solar-plus-storage solution for buyers who need it.

For most international buyers - particularly those working on financed utility-scale or large C&I projects - Trina Solar is the clear default, given its bankability, supply chain resilience, and established global service infrastructure. Runda is a plausible mid-tier option for price-sensitive residential or smaller commercial buyers in markets where the company maintains active distribution, but the near-absence of independent field reviews makes long-term reliability harder to verify. For project-financed work the two brands are not interchangeable; for straightforward residential installations the difference narrows, though Trina's track record still gives it the edge.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runda Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Runda Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Runda Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.