---
title: "Runda Solar vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Runda Solar vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-aiko"
---

# Runda Solar vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 6 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. Runda Solar leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Runda Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province | Shanghai |
| Founded | 2009 | 2009 |
| Employees | 800+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 4GW (modules), 8GW (cells), 1GWh (energy storage) GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed | NEEQ (National Equities Exchange and Quotations): 832391 | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | http://www.rundaenergy.com/ (redirects to https://www.rundapv.com/) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

Runda Solar (Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd.) is a high-tech company dedicated to manufacturing world-class solar photovoltaic modules. The company's business covers the entire photovoltaic industry chain, including R&D, production, and sales of PV modules, as well as energy storage and smart grid solutions. Runda Solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Runda Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 6 | 144 | +138 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 805 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 718 W | 581 W | +136 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Runda Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.50% | 25.20% | +1.70 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 23.10% | 23.65% | +0.55 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Runda Solar | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.310%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.039 |
| Bifacial Share | 6 (100%) | 35 (24%) | +76 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +0.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Runda Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 22-23% | 2 (33.3%) | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (66.7%) | 123 (85.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runda Solar offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | Runda Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 700W+ | 6 (100.0%) | 9 (6.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | Runda Solar | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 6 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, Runda Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RS730S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs730s9-132gant) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RS725S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs725s9-132gant) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RS720S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs720s9-132gant) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RS715S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs715s9-132gant) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RS710S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs710s9-132gant) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RS705S9-132GANT](https://comparepv.com/panel/runda-solar-rs705s9-132gant) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Runda Solar, operating as Jiangsu Runda PV Co., Ltd., is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2009 and headquartered in Yancheng, Jiangsu Province. The company holds TÜV and UL certifications and, as of early 2025, passed European Fire Protection Class 1 certification for its N-type bifacial glass-glass series. However, no evidence in available sources places Runda on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability list, and its precise annual production scale is not publicly reported. AIKO Solar - formally rooted in a company dating to the mid-2000s and operating under its current structure from a 2016 reorganization - is headquartered in the Guangdong/Shanghai region of China, reports approximately 20 GW of production capacity, and achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status by Q3 2024. AIKO has a decisively stronger institutional footprint, with six gigafactories across multiple Chinese provinces and a European R&D centre, Solarlab AIKO Europe, in Freiburg, Germany.

Runda's catalog spans PERC, TOPCon, and HJT cell technologies and is pitched at residential rooftops, commercial and industrial distributed systems, and utility-scale ground mounts - a broad, value-oriented positioning with limited consumer review coverage on major platforms. AIKO has built its identity almost entirely around its proprietary ABC (All Back Contact) N-type technology, which relocates electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to reduce shading losses and improve low-light performance. Its Neostar series is aimed squarely at premium residential and commercial rooftops where space efficiency and output per panel command a price premium. AIKO claimed a 2025 record of 24.4% module efficiency for mass-produced panels, and its 30-year performance warranty with a degradation rate of 0.35% per year from year two onward is notably more generous than most competitors.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the stronger default choice where budget allows. Its Tier 1 status, verified efficiency records, strong installer feedback - including a first-place finish in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers Choice Awards - and long warranty make it easier to finance and insure on larger projects. Runda is a reasonable consideration for cost-sensitive commercial or utility work where bankability requirements are less strict, but buyers should be aware of its lower visibility in independent reviews and the absence of confirmed Tier 1 standing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/manufacturers/jiangsu-runda-pv \| Jiangsu Runda PV manufacturer profile - Solar Reviews \| review

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes \| review

\- https://sunsparkenergy.com.au/blog/solar-panels-1/aiko-solar-panels-review-2025-14 \| AIKO Solar Panels Review 2025 - Sun Spark Energy \| review

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/64212/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q4-2025/ \| Tier 1 Solar Panel Manufacturers List Q4 2025 - Vico Export \| article

\- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rdkVNV5djeA \| NEW AIKO Neostar 3 Review - Are Aiko Solar Panels the BEST in 2025? \| video

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Runda Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [Runda Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [Runda Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/runda-solar-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.