---
title: "RMCIP vs AIKO - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare RMCIP vs AIKO solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/rmcip-vs-aiko"
---

# RMCIP vs AIKO

AIKO has the broader catalog (144 vs 1 models). AIKO leads on peak efficiency at 25.20%. AIKO leans bifacial (24% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | RMCIP | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Russia | China |
| Headquarters | Ryazan | Shanghai |
| Founded | 1963 | 2009 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity | \<0.1 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | SZSE: 600732 |
| Website | [http://rmcip.com](http://rmcip.com) | [https://www.aikosolar.com](https://www.aikosolar.com) |

Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC (RMCIP) is a Russian industrial manufacturer established in 1963, primarily known as the only producer of sealed magnetically operated contacts (reed switches) in Russia and CIS countries. The company also manufactures crystalline silicon photovoltaic solar modules (RZMP...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | RMCIP | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 1 | 144 | +143 |
| Max Power | 200 W | 805 W | +605 W |
| Avg Power | 200 W | 581 W | +381 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | RMCIP | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 12.40% | 25.20% | +12.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 12.40% | 23.65% | +11.25 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | RMCIP | AIKO | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.400%/°C | -0.271%/°C | +0.129 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 35 (24%) | +24 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 29.5 yrs | +4.5 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

AIKO skews to higher efficiency: 85% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | RMCIP | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 1 (100.0%) | 3 (2.1%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 3 (2.1%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 12 (8.3%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 123 (85.4%) |


## Power distribution

AIKO offers more 600W+ panels (60% of lineup)


| Power band | RMCIP | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 1 (100.0%) | 2 (1.4%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 50 (34.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 5 (3.5%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 78 (54.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 9 (6.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **Back Contact** (83%)


| Technology | RMCIP | AIKO |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Unknown | 1 (100.0%) | 0 |
| Back Contact | 0 | 119 (82.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 17 (11.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 7 (4.9%) |
| Flexible | 0 | 1 (0.7%) |


## Top panels, RMCIP


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RZMP-200-T](https://comparepv.com/panel/rmcip-rzmp-200-t) | 200 | 12.4 | -0.400 | Polycrystalline |


## Top panels, AIKO


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [AIKO-A805-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a805-grh78dw) | 805 | 25.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [AIKO-A800-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a800-grh78dw) | 800 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [AIKO-A795-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a795-grh78dw) | 795 | 24.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [AIKO-A790-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a790-grh78dw) | 790 | 24.6 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [AIKO-A785-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a785-grh78dw) | 785 | 24.4 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [AIKO-A780-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a780-grh78dw) | 780 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [AIKO-A775-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a775-grh78dw) | 775 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [AIKO-A770-GRH78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a770-grh78dw) | 770 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [AIKO-A700-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a700-mae78dw) | 700 | 25.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [AIKO-A695-MAE78Dw](https://comparepv.com/panel/aiko-aiko-a695-mae78dw) | 695 | 24.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

RMCIP (Ryazan Metal Ceramics Instrumentation Plant JSC) is a Russian manufacturer headquartered in Ryazan, Russia, founded in 1963 as a producer of precision instrumentation and electronic components; solar PV modules are a secondary line of business for the firm. The company's reported maximum production capacity sits at around 12 MW per year - a micro-scale figure by any modern industry benchmark - and RMCIP does not appear on any BloombergNEF Tier 1 solar module maker lists, nor is it covered meaningfully in mainstream solar trade publications. AIKO Solar, by contrast, is a Chinese manufacturer that spent over a decade as a dedicated solar cell producer before expanding into finished modules, claiming to have shipped more than 130 GW of solar cells cumulatively. AIKO achieved BloombergNEF Tier 1 status in Q3 2024 and reported annual module production capacity of approximately 20 GW as of early 2025, with capacity reportedly reaching around 35.5 GW per year by mid-2026. AIKO carries a substantially stronger institutional and commercial footprint on the global stage.

RMCIP's panel range covers monocrystalline modules across a power band of roughly 75-275 Wp, with models serving off-grid stand-alone applications and small grid-connected installations. The product portfolio reflects older-generation crystalline silicon design, and no current independent efficiency benchmarks or third-party certification results are surfacing in trade sources. AIKO focuses on N-Type ABC (All Back Contact) cell technology, which relocates all electrical contacts to the rear of the cell to maximise the active light-absorbing area. Its modules reach independently confirmed efficiencies of around 24.6%, and the brand targets premium residential rooftop buyers where roof space is at a premium. AIKO panels took first place in the 2025 SolarQuotes Installers' Choice Awards in Australia and placed on the 2024 PV Evolution Labs Top Performers list, passing six of seven reliability tests including thermal cycling and hail resistance.

For a typical buyer in 2025, AIKO is the clear practical choice. It offers bankable Tier 1 credentials, a 30-year performance warranty with a low annual degradation rate, third-party verified high efficiency, and a growing global distribution and support network. RMCIP is a niche, legacy manufacturer with a very small panel portfolio and no documented international Tier 1 standing; it may serve specialised domestic Russian applications, but it is not a realistic alternative for residential or commercial buyers seeking globally competitive solar technology.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/rmcip \| RMCIP manufacturer profile - ENF Solar directory \| article

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html \| Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/ \| AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - official announcement \| article

\- https://www.vicoexport.com/en/67499/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q2-2026/ \| Tier 1 list of solar panel manufacturers Q2 2026 \| article

\- https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-pros-and-cons/ \| AIKO Solar panels pros and cons - PSC Energy \| review

Sources:

\- \[RMCIP manufacturer profile - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/rmcip)

\- \[Aiko Solar panels review - SolarQuotes Australia\](https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/aiko-solar-review.html)

\- \[AIKO achieves BloombergNEF Tier 1 status\](https://aikosolar.com/en/aiko-achieves-prestigious-tier1-status/)

\- \[Tier 1 list of solar panel manufacturers Q2 2026\](https://www.vicoexport.com/en/67499/tier-1-list-of-solar-panel-manufacturers-q2-2026/)

\- \[AIKO Solar panels pros and cons - PSC Energy\](https://www.pscenergy.com.au/blog/aiko-solar-panels-pros-and-cons/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [RMCIP vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/rmcip-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aiko)
- [RMCIP vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/rmcip-vs-aeet)
- [AKCOME vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aiko)
- [RMCIP vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/rmcip-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aiko)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/rmcip-vs-aiko

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.