---
title: "Risen vs ZNShine - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Risen vs ZNShine solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-znshine"
---

# Risen vs ZNShine

ZNShine has the broader catalog (212 vs 153 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Risen | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ninghai | Suqian |
| Founded | 1986 | 1988 |
| Employees |  | 1,200 |
| Annual capacity |  | 10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 300118 | NEEQ: 838463 |
| Website | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) | [http://www.znshinesolar.com](http://www.znshinesolar.com) |

ZNShine Solar is a high-tech PV enterprise specializing in R&D, manufacturing, and sales of solar modules. They also provide integrated photovoltaic, battery storage, and green hydrogen solutions, as well as BIPV, rooftop solar, and utility-scale solar solutions with a commitment to boosting green electricity...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Risen | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 153 | 212 | +59 |
| Max Power | 745 W | 670 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 547 W | 535 W | +13 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Risen | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.00% | 22.83% | +1.17 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 21.35% | +0.47 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Risen | ZNShine | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.329%/°C | +0.038 |
| Bifacial Share | 125 (82%) | 89 (42%) | +40 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.3 yrs | +0.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Risen | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (2.6%) | 5 (2.4%) |
| 20-21% | 24 (15.7%) | 59 (27.8%) |
| 21-22% | 52 (34.0%) | 101 (47.6%) |
| 22-23% | 57 (37.3%) | 47 (22.2%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (10.5%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Risen | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 13 (8.5%) | 6 (2.8%) |
| 400-499W | 46 (30.1%) | 64 (30.2%) |
| 500-599W | 34 (22.2%) | 99 (46.7%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (27.5%) | 43 (20.3%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (11.8%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (63%)


| Technology | Risen | ZNShine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 60 (39.2%) | 78 (36.8%) |
| HJT | 48 (31.4%) | 0 |
| PERC | 45 (29.4%) | 134 (63.2%) |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, ZNShine


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZXM8-TP132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZXM8-TP132-670](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-670W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-670w) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [ZXM8-TP132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [ZXM8-TPLDD132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpldd132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [ZXM8-TPLD132-665W](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tpld132-665w) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [ZXM8-TP132-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/znshine-zxm8-tp132-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Risen Energy is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, with roots tracing to 1986 under the predecessor name Ninghai Risen Electric, rebranded as Risen Energy in 2009 and now listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange. The company holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 status - confirmed again in Q1 2026 - with annual production capacity exceeding 48 GW and cumulative global shipments surpassing 114 GW by 2025. ZNShine, formally ZNSHINE PV-TECH Co., Ltd, is headquartered in Changzhou, China, and has maintained an unbroken BloombergNEF Tier 1 status since 2013, one of the longest consecutive streaks among Chinese module manufacturers. Its current production capacity stands at approximately 10 GW across three domestic facilities, with planned expansion into Indonesia. Both companies are considered bankable by major project lenders, but Risen's substantially larger production scale and shipment volume give it a considerably stronger institutional footprint on the international project-finance stage.

Risen covers a broad range of applications and cell technologies. Its N-type TOPCon modules serve residential rooftops and commercial systems, while the flagship Hyper-Ion HJT series - reaching over 700 W per panel - targets utility-scale ground-mount plants and large solar parks. Simultaneously running both TOPCon and HJT product lines is relatively uncommon at this production scale and signals serious R&D commitment. ZNShine's portfolio is more focused: the company primarily offers N-type TOPCon bifacial double-glass modules in the 570-630 W power class, aimed chiefly at commercial, industrial, and utility-scale buyers. ZNShine has been recognised as a Top Performer in Kiwa PVEL's PV Module Reliability Scorecard for seven consecutive years, providing independent third-party validation of module durability that risk-averse developers and lenders increasingly require.

For a buyer comparing the two, the better choice depends on the project mix. Risen is the more versatile supplier - its wider technology and wattage range makes it a natural fit for portfolios spanning residential, C&I, and utility within a single supplier relationship. ZNShine suits buyers focused on high-wattage bifacial TOPCon procurement for commercial or utility projects, particularly those who weight long-running independent reliability data heavily in their vendor selection. In the commercial-to-utility TOPCon bifacial segment specifically, the two brands are broadly comparable in quality and bankability, and price, delivery lead times, and distributor relationships will often be the deciding factors.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Risen vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-znshine)
- [Risen vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-znshine)
- [Risen vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs ZNShine](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-znshine)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-znshine

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.