---
title: "Risen vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Risen vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Risen vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 153 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Risen leans bifacial (82% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Risen | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ninghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 1986 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 300118 |  |
| Website | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Risen | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 153 | 340 | +187 |
| Max Power | 745 W | 760 W | +15 W |
| Avg Power | 547 W | 520 W | +27 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Risen | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.00% | 24.80% | +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 21.71% | +0.11 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Risen | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.011 |
| Bifacial Share | 125 (82%) | 145 (43%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Risen | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (2.6%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 24 (15.7%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 52 (34.0%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 57 (37.3%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (10.5%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Risen | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 13 (8.5%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 46 (30.1%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 34 (22.2%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (27.5%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (11.8%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Risen | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 60 (39.2%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| HJT | 48 (31.4%) | 0 |
| PERC | 45 (29.4%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Risen Energy is a Chinese solar module manufacturer founded in 2002 and headquartered in Ningbo. The company holds Tier 1 status with BloombergNEF and has reported annual production capacity exceeding 48 GW, with cumulative shipments surpassing 114.5 GW. Trina Solar (Trinasolar), founded in 1997 and based in Changzhou, is one of the largest solar manufacturers globally - it achieved a 100% bankability score in BNEF's 2025 PV Module ranking, the eighth time it has topped that list, and cumulative shipments exceeded 292 GW as of mid-2025. With an estimated global market share of around 11% versus Risen Energy's roughly 4%, and annual shipments placing it third worldwide, Trina Solar carries a demonstrably stronger institutional footprint and broader lender recognition in project finance contexts.

For residential rooftop installations, both manufacturers offer compact, high-efficiency modules suited to pitched and flat-roof deployments. Risen Energy has made heterojunction (HJT) technology a strategic differentiator - its flagship Hyper-ion Pro series reaches up to 740 W output at module efficiencies above 24%, making it a notable HJT specialist globally. The company also produces TOPCon and PERC modules and has opened a European headquarters in Madrid to support regional growth. Trina Solar centers its current lineup on N-type TOPCon under the Vertex N platform, covering residential (Vertex S+), commercial and industrial, and utility-scale segments, with flagship modules reaching up to 760 W and 24.5% efficiency. Trina has earned the TOP Performer designation from independent testing lab Kiwa PVEL for eleven consecutive years.

For international buyers choosing between the two, both are credible, bankable options backed by strong warranties and independently verified quality records. Trina Solar's higher cumulative shipment volume, broader financial recognition, and consistent PVEL performance history make it a lower-risk choice for large-scale projects requiring project financing. Risen Energy is a compelling option for buyers specifically seeking high-efficiency HJT modules or competitive pricing in that technology segment. In many residential and standard commercial applications, the two brands are effectively interchangeable in terms of quality and long-term reliability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Risen vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Risen vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Risen vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.