---
title: "Risen vs Sunova - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Risen vs Sunova solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-sunova"
---

# Risen vs Sunova

Sunova has the broader catalog (183 vs 153 models). Risen leads on peak efficiency at 24.00%. Sunova leans bifacial (92% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Risen | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ninghai | Hefei |
| Founded | 1986 | 2008 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | SZSE: 300118 |  |
| Website | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) | [https://www.sunovasolar.com](https://www.sunovasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Risen | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 153 | 183 | +30 |
| Max Power | 745 W | 720 W | +25 W |
| Avg Power | 547 W | 523 W | +24 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Risen | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.00% | 23.20% | +0.80 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 21.60% | +0.22 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Risen | Sunova | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.317%/°C | +0.026 |
| Bifacial Share | 125 (82%) | 168 (92%) | +10 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 28.4 yrs | +0.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Risen skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Risen | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (2.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 24 (15.7%) | 46 (25.1%) |
| 21-22% | 52 (34.0%) | 70 (38.3%) |
| 22-23% | 57 (37.3%) | 57 (31.1%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (10.5%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Power distribution

Risen offers more 600W+ panels (39% of lineup)


| Power band | Risen | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 13 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 46 (30.1%) | 84 (45.9%) |
| 500-599W | 34 (22.2%) | 58 (31.7%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (27.5%) | 31 (16.9%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (11.8%) | 10 (5.5%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (39%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (49%)


| Technology | Risen | Sunova |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 60 (39.2%) | 12 (6.6%) |
| HJT | 48 (31.4%) | 0 |
| PERC | 45 (29.4%) | 89 (48.6%) |
| N-type | 0 | 72 (39.3%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 10 (5.5%) |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Sunova


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TS-BGT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TS-BWT66(720)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-720-g12) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TS-BGT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TS-BWT66(715)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-715-g12) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TS-BGT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TS-BWT66(710)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-710-g12) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TS-BGT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TS-BWT66(705)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-705-g12) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TS-BGT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bgt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TS-BWT66(700)-G12](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunova-ts-bwt66-700-g12) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Risen Energy is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Ningbo, active in solar production since 2002, though the parent company dates back to 1986 as a rubber and plastics producer. Over two decades in photovoltaics, Risen has grown into a top-five global module supplier, with an annual production capacity exceeding 48 GW and cumulative shipments surpassing 114.5 GW. The company holds Bloomberg New Energy Finance Tier 1 status, underpinning its bankability for project-financed utility deals. Sunova Solar - which also operates under the Thornova Solar brand - is a smaller Chinese manufacturer with factories in China and Vietnam. Sunova first appeared on the BNEF Tier 1 list in Q3 2023 and has maintained that status since, but its annual production capacity is estimated at roughly 5.5 to 6.5 GW, a fraction of Risen's scale. In terms of institutional footprint and global name recognition, Risen holds a clear advantage.

Risen's product portfolio spans PERC, TOPCon, and HJT cell technologies, the last marketed under the Hyper-Ion brand. Its N-type TOPCon modules target residential rooftops and commercial installations, while the flagship HJT Hyper-Ion Pro has achieved 740 W average output in mass production at a cell efficiency of 26.61%, making it well suited to utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial projects in demanding climates. Risen has earned Top Performer status in all seven PV Evolution Labs evaluations. Sunova's lineup centers on TOPCon and HJT modules: its bifacial TOPCon panel based on a 182 mm wafer delivers up to 575 W at 22.2% efficiency, while its HJT offering reaches up to 480 W. Sunova positions its products primarily for commercial rooftops and utility ground-mount applications, with less visible presence in the residential segment.

For most international buyers, Risen is the more straightforward default - its scale, diversified technology roadmap, and long track record reduce counterparty risk. Sunova is a credible option for buyers who have secured competitive pricing and whose project financiers already accept its Tier 1 credentials, but the shorter bankability history warrants additional due diligence on warranty backstop and long-term service availability.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Risen vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunova)
- [Risen vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunova)
- [Risen vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Sunova](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunova)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-sunova

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.