---
title: "Risen vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Risen vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-runergy"
image: "https://comparepv.com/og/compare/manufacturers/risen/runergy.png"
---

# Risen vs Runergy

Risen has the broader catalog (153 vs 124 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Risen | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ninghai | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 1986 | 2013 |
| Employees |  | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity |  | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | SZSE: 300118 |  |
| Website | [https://www.risenenergy.com](https://www.risenenergy.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Risen | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 153 | 124 | +29 |
| Max Power | 745 W | 740 W | +5 W |
| Avg Power | 547 W | 579 W | +32 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Risen | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.00% | 24.10% | +0.10 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.82% | 22.42% | +0.60 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Risen | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.291%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 125 (82%) | 95 (77%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.1 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +0.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Risen | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 4 (2.6%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 24 (15.7%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 52 (34.0%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 57 (37.3%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 16 (10.5%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Risen | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 13 (8.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 46 (30.1%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 34 (22.2%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 42 (27.5%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 18 (11.8%) | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: TOPCon (39%)

Dominant cell tech: N-type (60%)


| Technology | Risen | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 60 (39.2%) | 0 |
| HJT | 48 (31.4%) | 18 (14.5%) |
| PERC | 45 (29.4%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| N-type | 0 | 74 (59.7%) |


## Top panels, Risen


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RSM132-8-745BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-745bhdg) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RSM132-8-740BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-740bhdg) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RSM132-8-735BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-735bhdg) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RSM132-8-730BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-730bhdg) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RSM132-8-725BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-725bhdg) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RSM132-8-720BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-720bhdg) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RSM132-8-715BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-715bhdg) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RSM132-8-700-715BHDG (715W)](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-700-715bhdg-715w) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RSM132-8-710BHDG](https://comparepv.com/panel/risen-energy-co-ltd-rsm132-8-710bhdg) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced material from both brands to write a grounded comparison now.

Risen is a Chinese solar manufacturer, headquartered in Ningbo, Zhejiang, and has built a sizable vertically integrated supply chain reaching tens of gigawatts of annual module capacity, with figures cited around 45-48 GW in recent reporting. Risen has appeared on Bloomberg's Tier 1 bankability list, a designation that reflects financing track record rather than product quality. The company's recent financial picture is mixed, with reporting describing widening losses in 2024-2025 tied partly to its bet on HJT cell technology at a time when most competitors shifted to cheaper TOPCon production. Runergy, also a Chinese manufacturer, is a newer and more cell-technology-focused player that was named a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV module manufacturer in late 2023, and has since expanded internationally with a module plant in Huntsville, Alabama aimed at n-type production for the US market. Runergy has also drawn strategic investment interest, including a reported 2024 capital agreement with polysilicon giant Tongwei. On institutional footprint, Risen has the longer operating history and broader manufacturing base, while Runergy's momentum is more recent and technology-driven.

In terms of product focus, Risen's catalog centers on TOPCon n-type modules such as its Titan S line, commonly pitched at residential and commercial rooftops, typically backed by a 25-year product warranty and 30-year output guarantee, alongside ongoing HJT development. Runergy is primarily a cell and module technology specialist built around advanced TOPCon production, having certified "TOPCon 3.0" modules at a reported 25.9% efficiency, positioning it as a strong fit for utility-scale and high-efficiency commercial installations where cutting-edge cell performance matters more than brand longevity. Runergy has also been involved in patent disputes with Trinasolar over TOPCon technology, which is a sign of how competitive the n-type segment has become industry-wide.

For a typical buyer in 2025, the choice is not clear-cut. Risen offers a longer track record and broader product range but carries some financial risk signals that could matter for long-term warranty confidence. Runergy offers newer, high-efficiency TOPCon technology and growing US manufacturing presence, but has a shorter independent review history and less diversified product breadth. Buyers prioritizing technical performance and US-made supply may lean toward Runergy, while those valuing an established, broader-catalog Tier 1 supplier may still consider Risen, provided they factor in its reported financial pressures.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine-australia.com/?p=14334 \| Risen presents 475 W TOPCon solar panel with 23.8% efficiency \| article

\- https://solarquotes.com.au/panels/risen-review.html \| Risen solar panel independent review \| review

\- https://pv-tech.org/risen-energy-reports-56-revenue-growth-in-a-tech-led-2022 \| Risen Energy reports 56% revenue growth in a tech-led 2022 \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/runergys-topcon-3-0-solar-modules-25-9-conversion-efficiency/ \| Runergy's TOPCon 3.0 solar modules certified at 25.9% efficiency \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/markets/runergys-2-gw-solar-module-manufacturing-fab-in-alabama-us \| Runergy's 2 GW solar module manufacturing fab in Alabama, US \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Risen vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [Risen vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [Risen vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/risen-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.