---
title: "RedSolar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons & Specs | ComparePV"
description: "In-depth RedSolar solar panel review 2026. 41 models analyzed: efficiency, cell technology, warranty, top picks. Compare RedSolar panels on ComparePV."
source: "https://comparepv.com/reviews/redsolar"
---

# RedSolar panels, *read off the datasheets*

Hunan Red Solar New Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (RedSolar) is a state-owned high-tech enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC), one of China's largest Fortune 500 state-owned conglomerates. The company manufactures solar cells,...

Everything below is computed from those 41 datasheets: no score out of ten, no ranking of brands against each other, and nothing a manufacturer can pay to change. Where RedSolar does not publish a figure, it is left out of the average rather than assumed.


## The company

- **Founded:** 2008
- **Headquarters:** Changsha, China
- **Employees:** 1000-2000

Company facts, not datasheet figures. Tier 1 is a financier's bankability list, and says nothing about how a panel performs.


## Key figures


| Measure | Value | Note |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Panels | 41 | models in the database |
| Average efficiency | 22.4 % | across the catalogue |
| Best efficiency | 23.2 % (good) | their strongest module |
| Power range | 400-720 Wp | smallest to largest |
| Bifacial share | 88 % | 36 dual-sided models |
| Average warranty | 29 years | guaranteed output term |


## 01. The top of the range

The leaders of RedSolar's own catalogue on the two figures a specification sheet leads with. Neither is a verdict: the most efficient module in a range is rarely the one that suits a given roof.


### Most efficient

module efficiency


| # | Panel | power | efficiency |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-720T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-720t-gdf-132) | 720 Wp | 23.2% (good) |
| 2 | [CETC-595T(GDF)/144](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-595t-gdf-144) | 595 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 3 | [CETC-620TR(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-620tr-gdf-132) | 620 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 4 | [CETC-715T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-715t-gdf-132) | 715 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 5 | [M10R-620TR](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-m10r-620tr) | 620 Wp | 22.9% (good) |

- CETC-720T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-595T(GDF)/144 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-620TR(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-715T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- M10R-620TR - Monocrystalline bifacial

[Sort the whole catalogue by efficiency](https://comparepv.com/panels/redsolar?sort_by=efficiency&sort_order=desc)


### Highest power

nameplate output


| # | Panel | efficiency | power |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-720T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-720t-gdf-132) | 23.2% (good) | 720 Wp |
| 2 | [CETC-715T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-715t-gdf-132) | 23.0% (good) | 715 Wp |
| 3 | [CETC-710T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-710t-gdf-132) | 22.9% (good) | 710 Wp |
| 4 | [CETC-705T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-705t-gdf-132) | 22.7% (good) | 705 Wp |
| 5 | [CETC-700T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-700t-gdf-132) | 22.5% (good) | 700 Wp |

- CETC-720T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-715T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-710T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-705T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-700T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial

[Sort the whole catalogue by power](https://comparepv.com/panels/redsolar?sort_by=power&sort_order=desc)


## 02. By what the array is for

Three cuts of the same catalogue, each ordered by efficiency inside its band. An empty column means the brand does not build for that case.


### For a house roof

380-460 Wp


| # | Panel | power | efficiency |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-455TR(GDF)/96](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-455tr-gdf-96) | 455 Wp | 22.8% (good) |
| 2 | [CETC-450TR(GDF)/96](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-450tr-gdf-96) | 450 Wp | 22.5% (good) |
| 3 | [CETC-445TR(GDF)/96](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-445tr-gdf-96) | 445 Wp | 22.3% (good) |
| 4 | [CETC-440TR(GDF)/96](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-440tr-gdf-96) | 440 Wp | 22.0% (good) |
| 5 | [CETC-435TR(GDF)/96](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-435tr-gdf-96) | 435 Wp | 21.8% |

- CETC-455TR(GDF)/96 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-450TR(GDF)/96 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-445TR(GDF)/96 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-440TR(GDF)/96 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-435TR(GDF)/96 - Monocrystalline bifacial


### For a commercial array

500 Wp and up


| # | Panel | power | efficiency |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-720T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-720t-gdf-132) | 720 Wp | 23.2% (good) |
| 2 | [CETC-715T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-715t-gdf-132) | 715 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 3 | [CETC-710T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-710t-gdf-132) | 710 Wp | 22.9% (good) |
| 4 | [CETC-705T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-705t-gdf-132) | 705 Wp | 22.7% (good) |
| 5 | [CETC-700T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-700t-gdf-132) | 700 Wp | 22.5% (good) |

- CETC-720T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-715T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-710T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-705T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-700T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial


### For a ground mount

dual-sided


| # | Panel | power | efficiency |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-720T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-720t-gdf-132) | 720 Wp | 23.2% (good) |
| 2 | [CETC-595T(GDF)/144](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-595t-gdf-144) | 595 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 3 | [CETC-620TR(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-620tr-gdf-132) | 620 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 4 | [CETC-715T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-715t-gdf-132) | 715 Wp | 23.0% (good) |
| 5 | [M10R-620TR](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-m10r-620tr) | 620 Wp | 22.9% (good) |

- CETC-720T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-595T(GDF)/144 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-620TR(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- CETC-715T(GDF)/132 - Monocrystalline bifacial
- M10R-620TR - Monocrystalline bifacial


## 03. What the catalogue is made of

Shares are of the 41 modules in the database, counted once each. A power ladder of one module counts as its rungs, which is why a large catalogue is not the same as a wide one.

[Cell technology across the market](https://comparepv.com/stats/cell-technology)


### Cell technology

share of the catalogue


| # | Panel | share | panels |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | TOPCon | 82.9% | 34 |
|  | PERC | 12.2% | 5 |
|  | N-type | 4.9% | 2 |

TOPCon accounts for 82.9% of the catalogue - 34 of 41 modules.


### Efficiency spread

share of the catalogue


| # | Panel | share | panels |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
|  | 20-21% | 4.9% | 2 |
|  | 21-22% | 9.8% | 4 |
|  | 22-23% | 75.6% | 31 |
|  | 23%+ | 9.8% | 4 |


## 04. Strengths and gaps

Both lists are derived from the figures above rather than written about the brand. A gap here is a gap in what is published, which is not always a gap in what is built.


### What this catalogue is good at

- **Strength:** High-efficiency panels available (up to 23.2%)
- **Strength:** Strong bifacial lineup - 88% of portfolio supports dual-sided generation
- **Strength:** Strong warranty coverage averaging 29 years
- **Strength:** High-power panels available (up to 720W) for commercial applications


## 05. In short

> **RedSolar:** RedSolar is an industry leader in efficiency, offering 41 panels suitable for both residential and commercial buyers. With an average efficiency of 22.4% and top models reaching 23.2%, their panels deliver competitive performance.


### Common questions


#### Is RedSolar a good solar panel manufacturer?

RedSolar offers 41 solar panel models with an average efficiency of 22.4%. Check their full panel lineup on ComparePV to find the best model for your needs.


#### What types of solar panels does RedSolar make?

RedSolar manufactures panels ranging from 400W to 720W, covering both residential and commercial applications. Their portfolio includes TOPCon (83%), PERC (12%), N-type (5%) cell technologies.


#### How efficient are RedSolar solar panels?

RedSolar panels have an average efficiency of 22.4%, with their most efficient model reaching 23.2%. This puts them among the industry leaders in the current market.


#### Does RedSolar make bifacial solar panels?

Yes, RedSolar offers 36 bifacial panels, representing 88% of their portfolio. Bifacial panels can generate additional energy from the rear side, making them ideal for ground-mounted systems.


#### What warranty does RedSolar offer on their solar panels?

RedSolar panels come with an average performance warranty of 29 years. This warranty guarantees that the panels will maintain a specified level of power output over time, protecting your investment against degradation beyond normal levels.


#### Are RedSolar panels good for residential use?

RedSolar offers panels in the residential-friendly 380-460W range. For home installations, look for models with high efficiency and compact dimensions to maximize power from limited roof space. Browse their full lineup on ComparePV to filter by power range and specifications.


#### Does RedSolar use TOPCon technology?

Yes, RedSolar has adopted TOPCon (Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) cell technology in part of their portfolio. TOPCon cells offer higher efficiency and better temperature performance compared to older PERC technology, making them a strong choice for maximizing energy production.


## 06. Compared with

A brand comparison weighs the two catalogues against each other - what each builds, at what efficiency, and how deep the range goes.

[Build your own](https://comparepv.com/comparisons)

- [RedSolar vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-redsolar)
- [RedSolar vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-redsolar)
- [RedSolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-trina-solar)
- [RedSolar vs LONGi](https://comparepv.com/longi-vs-redsolar)
- [RedSolar vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-redsolar)
- [RedSolar vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-redsolar)
- [RedSolar vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-redsolar)
- [RedSolar vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-redsolar)


## Elsewhere

- [All RedSolar panels 41](https://comparepv.com/panels/redsolar)
- [All manufacturers](https://comparepv.com/reviews)
- [Panel database](https://comparepv.com/panels)
- [Market statistics](https://comparepv.com/stats)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/reviews/redsolar

