--- title: "Panasonic Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons & Specs | ComparePV" description: "In-depth Panasonic solar panel review 2026. 25 models analyzed: efficiency, cell technology, warranty, top picks. Compare Panasonic panels on ComparePV." source: "https://comparepv.com/reviews/panasonic" --- # Panasonic panels, *read off the datasheets* Panasonic is a global leader in the development of innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors. The company was founded in 1918 by Konosuke Matsushita and has been committed to enhancing... Everything below is computed from those 25 datasheets: no score out of ten, no ranking of brands against each other, and nothing a manufacturer can pay to change. Where Panasonic does not publish a figure, it is left out of the average rather than assumed. ## The company - **Founded:** 1918 - **Headquarters:** Kadoma, near Ōsaka, Japan - **Annual capacity:** 1+ GW - **Employees:** 9,500+ - **Listed:** Tokyo Stock Exchange: 6752 Company facts, not datasheet figures. Tier 1 is a financier's bankability list, and says nothing about how a panel performs. ## Key figures | Measure | Value | Note | | --- | --- | --- | | Panels | 25 | models in the database | | Average efficiency | 20.7 % | across the catalogue | | Best efficiency | 22.2 % | their strongest module | | Power range | 325-430 Wp | smallest to largest | | Bifacial share | 16 % | 4 dual-sided models | | Average warranty | 25 years | guaranteed output term | ## 01. The top of the range The leaders of Panasonic's own catalogue on the two figures a specification sheet leads with. Neither is a verdict: the most efficient module in a range is rarely the one that suits a given roof. ### Most efficient module efficiency | # | Panel | power | efficiency | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [EVPV430HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv430hk2) | 430 Wp | 22.2% (good) | | 2 | [EVPV410H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410h) | 410 Wp | 22.2% (good) | | 3 | [EVPV410HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410hk) | 410 Wp | 22.2% (good) | | 4 | [EVPV380](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv380) | 380 Wp | 21.7% | | 5 | [EVPV420HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv420hk2) | 420 Wp | 21.7% | - EVPV430HK2 - Monocrystalline - EVPV410H - Monocrystalline - EVPV410HK - Monocrystalline - EVPV380 - Monocrystalline - EVPV420HK2 - Monocrystalline [Sort the whole catalogue by efficiency](https://comparepv.com/panels/panasonic?sort_by=efficiency&sort_order=desc) ### Highest power nameplate output | # | Panel | efficiency | power | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [EVPV430HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv430hk2) | 22.2% (good) | 430 Wp | | 2 | [EVPV420HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv420hk2) | 21.7% | 420 Wp | | 3 | [EVPV410H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410h) | 22.2% (good) | 410 Wp | | 4 | [EVPV410HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410hk) | 22.2% (good) | 410 Wp | | 5 | [EVPV400H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv400h) | 21.6% | 400 Wp | - EVPV430HK2 - Monocrystalline - EVPV420HK2 - Monocrystalline - EVPV410H - Monocrystalline - EVPV410HK - Monocrystalline - EVPV400H - Monocrystalline [Sort the whole catalogue by power](https://comparepv.com/panels/panasonic?sort_by=power&sort_order=desc) ## 02. By what the array is for Three cuts of the same catalogue, each ordered by efficiency inside its band. An empty column means the brand does not build for that case. ### For a house roof 380-460 Wp | # | Panel | power | efficiency | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [EVPV430HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv430hk2) | 430 Wp | 22.2% (good) | | 2 | [EVPV410H](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410h) | 410 Wp | 22.2% (good) | | 3 | [EVPV410HK](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv410hk) | 410 Wp | 22.2% (good) | | 4 | [EVPV380](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv380) | 380 Wp | 21.7% | | 5 | [EVPV420HK2](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-evpv420hk2) | 420 Wp | 21.7% | - EVPV430HK2 - Monocrystalline - EVPV410H - Monocrystalline - EVPV410HK - Monocrystalline - EVPV380 - Monocrystalline - EVPV420HK2 - Monocrystalline ### For a ground mount dual-sided | # | Panel | power | efficiency | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [VBHN340SA17](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-vbhn340sa17) | 340 Wp | 20.3% | | 2 | [VBHN335SA17](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-vbhn335sa17) | 335 Wp | 20.0% | | 3 | [VBHN330SA17](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-vbhn330sa17) | 330 Wp | 19.7% | | 4 | [VBHN325SA17](https://comparepv.com/panel/panasonic-vbhn325sa17) | 325 Wp | 19.4% | - VBHN340SA17 - Monocrystalline bifacial - VBHN335SA17 - Monocrystalline bifacial - VBHN330SA17 - Monocrystalline bifacial - VBHN325SA17 - Monocrystalline bifacial ## 03. What the catalogue is made of Shares are of the 25 modules in the database, counted once each. A power ladder of one module counts as its rungs, which is why a large catalogue is not the same as a wide one. [Cell technology across the market](https://comparepv.com/stats/cell-technology) ### Cell technology share of the catalogue | # | Panel | share | panels | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | HJT | 88.0% | 22 | | | PERC | 12.0% | 3 | HJT accounts for 88.0% of the catalogue - 22 of 25 modules. ### Efficiency spread share of the catalogue | # | Panel | share | panels | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | \<20% | 24.0% | 6 | | | 20-21% | 32.0% | 8 | | | 21-22% | 32.0% | 8 | | | 22-23% | 12.0% | 3 | ## 04. Strengths and gaps Both lists are derived from the figures above rather than written about the brand. A gap here is a gap in what is published, which is not always a gap in what is built. ### What this catalogue is good at - **Strength:** Strong warranty coverage averaging 25 years - **Strength:** Established manufacturer with 108+ years of experience - **Strength:** Large-scale production capacity of 1+ GW ### Where it is thin - **Watch out:** Average efficiency of 20.7% is below the industry leading edge - **Watch out:** Limited bifacial panel options - **Watch out:** No high-power panels (500W+) available for commercial use ## 05. In short > **Panasonic:** Panasonic is a solid option, offering 25 panels suitable for residential installations. With an average efficiency of 20.7% and top models reaching 22.2%, their panels deliver competitive performance. ### Common questions #### Is Panasonic a good solar panel manufacturer? Panasonic offers 25 solar panel models with an average efficiency of 20.7%. Check their full panel lineup on ComparePV to find the best model for your needs. #### What types of solar panels does Panasonic make? Panasonic manufactures panels ranging from 325W to 430W, covering both residential and commercial applications. Their portfolio includes HJT (88%), PERC (12%) cell technologies. #### How efficient are Panasonic solar panels? Panasonic panels have an average efficiency of 20.7%, with their most efficient model reaching 22.2%. This puts them in the competitive range in the current market. #### Does Panasonic make bifacial solar panels? Yes, Panasonic offers 4 bifacial panels, representing 16% of their portfolio. Bifacial panels can generate additional energy from the rear side, making them ideal for ground-mounted systems. #### What warranty does Panasonic offer on their solar panels? Panasonic panels come with an average performance warranty of 25 years. This warranty guarantees that the panels will maintain a specified level of power output over time, protecting your investment against degradation beyond normal levels. #### Are Panasonic panels good for residential use? Panasonic offers panels in the residential-friendly 380-460W range. For home installations, look for models with high efficiency and compact dimensions to maximize power from limited roof space. Browse their full lineup on ComparePV to filter by power range and specifications. ## 06. Compared with A brand comparison weighs the two catalogues against each other - what each builds, at what efficiency, and how deep the range goes. [Build your own](https://comparepv.com/comparisons) - [Panasonic vs Jinko Solar](https://comparepv.com/jinko-solar-vs-panasonic) - [Panasonic vs JA Solar](https://comparepv.com/ja-solar-vs-panasonic) - [Panasonic vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/panasonic-vs-trina-solar) - [Panasonic vs LONGi](https://comparepv.com/longi-vs-panasonic) - [Panasonic vs Canadian Solar](https://comparepv.com/canadian-solar-vs-panasonic) - [Panasonic vs Q-Cells](https://comparepv.com/panasonic-vs-q-cells) - [Panasonic vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-panasonic) - [Panasonic vs Hyundai](https://comparepv.com/hyundai-vs-panasonic) ## Elsewhere - [All Panasonic panels 25](https://comparepv.com/panels/panasonic) - [All manufacturers](https://comparepv.com/reviews) - [Panel database](https://comparepv.com/panels) - [Market statistics](https://comparepv.com/stats) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/reviews/panasonic