---
title: "Renewsys vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Renewsys vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/renewsys-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Renewsys vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 45 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Renewsys leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Renewsys | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | India | China |
| Headquarters | Mumbai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2011 | 1997 |
| Employees | 1,071 |  |
| Annual capacity | 2.5 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.renewsysworld.com](http://www.renewsysworld.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

RenewSys is the first integrated manufacturer of Solar PV Modules and its key components - Encapsulants, Backsheets, and Solar PV Cells. Established in 2012, RenewSys is the renewable energy arm of the ENPEE Group, a diversified global conglomerate. They have manufacturing facilities in Hyderabad and Bengaluru.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Renewsys | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 45 | 340 | +295 |
| Max Power | 650 W | 760 W | +110 W |
| Avg Power | 542 W | 520 W | +22 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Renewsys | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.64% | 24.80% | +1.16 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.57% | 21.71% | +0.85 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Renewsys | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.294%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.008 |
| Bifacial Share | 45 (100%) | 145 (43%) | +57 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Renewsys skews to higher efficiency: 24% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Renewsys | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 8 (17.8%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 26 (57.8%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 11 (24.4%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |


## Power distribution

Renewsys offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | Renewsys | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 17 (37.8%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 12 (26.7%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 16 (35.6%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Renewsys | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 45 (100.0%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Renewsys


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-650](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-650) | 650 | 23.3 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-645](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-640](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-635) | 635 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-635](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-635) | 635 | 22.8 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-630](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-630) | 630 | 23.4 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-625](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-625) | 625 | 22.4 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [DESERV Extreme 132X 625](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-132x-625) | 625 | 23.2 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [DESERV EXTREME 156X-620](https://comparepv.com/panel/renewsys-deserv-extreme-156x-620) | 620 | 22.2 | -0.292 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Renewsys is an Indian solar manufacturer founded in 2011 by Avinash Hiranandani and headquartered in Mumbai. The company is part of the Enpee Group, which has been active in industrial manufacturing since 1961, and is India's first vertically integrated PV producer, making not only modules but also encapsulants, backsheets, and solar cells. Renewsys is recognized as a Tier 1 module brand, and following the inauguration of a new 3 GW automated facility in Maharashtra in March 2026, its total module manufacturing capacity stands at approximately 5.6 GW. Trina Solar, by contrast, was founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, China, by Jifan Gao, and consistently appears on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list with a manufacturing capacity of around 100 GW per year, placing it firmly among the top global solar producers. On the dimension of institutional footprint, project financing relationships, and procurement volume, Trina Solar operates at a significantly larger scale.

Renewsys markets its modules under the DESERV brand, with the current lineup centered on N-type TOPCon bifacial half-cut cells spanning power classes suited to residential rooftops, commercial and industrial (C&I) installations, and utility-scale ground-mount projects. Its 600W TOPCon module, reported by pv-magazine, delivers a front-side efficiency of 23.26%. The company exports to more than 50 countries but has its deepest commercial roots in India and the Middle East, with European distribution still developing. Trina Solar addresses a similar breadth of applications but with considerably greater product depth: the Vertex S and Vertex S+ G3 series are purpose-engineered for residential and C&I rooftops, while the large-format Vertex N i-TOPCon Ultra series - with modules reaching up to 740W in mass production as of 2025 - targets utility-scale and ground-mount projects globally. All current Trina Solar commercial series are based on n-type i-TOPCon cell technology, as confirmed by pvtech.org and pveurope.eu.

For most buyers in mature international markets, Trina Solar is the more straightforward default: it carries decades of field track record, deep distribution networks across Europe and beyond, and product lines purpose-designed for diverse grid and mounting standards. Renewsys presents a compelling case for buyers seeking high-efficiency TOPCon modules at competitive price points, or for those looking to diversify supply chains outside China. In smaller commercial and residential segments the two brands may be broadly interchangeable on a per-watt basis; in utility-scale procurement and project finance contexts, Trina Solar's bankability and supply liquidity give it a clear and meaningful advantage.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Renewsys vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/renewsys-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Renewsys vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/renewsys-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Renewsys vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/renewsys-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/renewsys-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.