---
title: "Renesola vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Renesola vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/renesola-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Renesola vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 115 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Renesola leans bifacial (61% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Renesola | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2005 | 1997 |
| Employees | 100-500 |  |
| Annual capacity | 16.5+ GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NYSE: SOL |  |
| Website | [http://www.renesola-energy.com](http://www.renesola-energy.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Renesola, established in 2005, is a pioneer in the global new energy field, committed to mitigating global warming and providing quality power station solutions for global clients. They offer one-stop solutions including development, financing, design, construction, operation, and maintenance, along with...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Renesola | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 115 | 340 | +225 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 760 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 514 W | 520 W | +6 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Renesola | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.51% | 24.80% | +1.29 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.67% | 21.71% | +0.04 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Renesola | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.304%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.002 |
| Bifacial Share | 70 (61%) | 145 (43%) | +18 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.7 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.4 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Renesola | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 15 (13.0%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 3 (2.6%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 20 (17.4%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 65 (56.5%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 12 (10.4%) | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Renesola | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 16 (13.9%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 33 (28.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 31 (27.0%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 28 (24.3%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 7 (6.1%) | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (77%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Renesola | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 88 (76.5%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| TOPCon | 26 (22.6%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| Unknown | 1 (0.9%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |


## Top panels, Renesola


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RS9-720NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-720nbg-e1) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RS9-715NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-715nbg-e1) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RS9-710NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-710nbg-e1) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RS9-705NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-705ng-e1) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RS9-705NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-705nbg-e1) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RS9-700NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-700ng-e1) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RS9-700NBG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-700nbg-e1) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RS9-695NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-695ng-e1) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RS9-690NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-690ng-e1) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RS9-685NG-E1](https://comparepv.com/panel/renesola-rs9-685ng-e1) | 685 | 22.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Renesola traces its origins to 2005, when it was founded as a Chinese solar manufacturer. It is worth noting a corporate split: the original ReneSola Ltd. divested its manufacturing operations around 2020 and today operates as Emeren Group, a project developer and independent power producer. The manufacturing brand is continued by Renesola Energy, a Chinese entity with reported module production capacity of more than 10 GW per year and cumulative shipments exceeding 25 GW. Renesola Energy has maintained BloombergNEF Tier 1 status across multiple quarters in 2025. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, Jiangsu province, operates at a substantially larger scale: annual production capacity exceeds 80 GW, total global shipments have surpassed 205 GW, and the company has held Tier 1 BNEF status for well over a decade. Trina has also earned consecutive PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven years. By any measure of institutional footprint - brand recognition, financing depth, and independent quality audits - Trina Solar carries the stronger standing.

Renesola Energy's current product lineup spans N-TOPCon, PERC, and HJT technologies, reaching up to 585 W output and approximately 22.65% module efficiency. The range covers monofacial and bifacial configurations and is particularly well suited to residential rooftop and small-to-medium commercial and industrial (C&I) installations. Product warranties run to 15 years, with a 30-year linear performance guarantee. Trina Solar's Vertex family is built entirely around N-type TOPCon: the Vertex S+ G3 (up to 485 W) targets residential and light commercial rooftops, the Vertex N series (up to roughly 620 W) addresses C&I ground-mount and rooftop, and the NEG21 module (760 W, 24.5% efficiency) is engineered for utility-scale ground-mount plants, with bifacial dual-glass construction and a low-voltage design that lowers balance-of-system costs. Trina also operates manufacturing in multiple countries, which can simplify supply chains in markets with active trade policy concerns.

For most international buyers - project finance, utility-scale procurement, or EPC contractors subject to lender bankability requirements - Trina Solar is the lower-risk default, given its scale, diversified supply chain, and long track record across independent quality tests. Renesola Energy is a credible Tier 1 option for residential installers and smaller C&I integrators where competitive module pricing and reliable warranty coverage are the primary criteria. In projects where specifications are broadly standard and financing is non-recourse, the two brands can be treated as interchangeable from a bankability standpoint.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Renesola vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/renesola-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Renesola vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/renesola-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Renesola vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/renesola-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/renesola-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.