---
title: "RedSolar vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare RedSolar vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# RedSolar vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 41 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. RedSolar leans bifacial (88% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | RedSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changsha | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 1997 |
| Employees | 1000-2000 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.red-solar.com](https://www.red-solar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Hunan Red Solar New Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (RedSolar) is a state-owned high-tech enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC), one of China's largest Fortune 500 state-owned conglomerates. The company manufactures solar cells, PV modules...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | RedSolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 41 | 340 | +299 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 760 W | +40 W |
| Avg Power | 582 W | 520 W | +61 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | RedSolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 24.80% | +1.60 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.36% | 21.71% | +0.65 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | RedSolar | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.303%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.001 |
| Bifacial Share | 36 (88%) | 145 (43%) | +45 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | RedSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (4.9%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 4 (9.8%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 31 (75.6%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (9.8%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |


## Power distribution

RedSolar offers more 600W+ panels (61% of lineup)


| Power band | RedSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 10 (24.4%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 6 (14.6%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 20 (48.8%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (12.2%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | RedSolar | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 34 (82.9%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 5 (12.2%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| N-type | 2 (4.9%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, RedSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-720T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-720t-gdf-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CETC-715T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-715t-gdf-132) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CETC-710T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-710t-gdf-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CETC-705T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-705t-gdf-132) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CETC-700T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-700t-gdf-132) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CETC-695T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-695t-gdf-132) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CETC-690T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-690t-gdf-132) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CETC-640T(GDF)/156](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-640t-gdf-156) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CETC-635T(GDF)/156](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-635t-gdf-156) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CETC-635TR(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-635tr-gdf-132) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

RedSolar is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Hunan Province, founded in 2008 as a state-owned enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC). That institutional lineage gives it six decades of accumulated semiconductor and photovoltaic research expertise. The company reports cumulative module deliveries exceeding 30 GW and claims approximately 50 GW of production lines deployed globally, though its independently verifiable annual production capacity appears to be in the low single-digit GW range. Its BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status could not be confirmed through available public sources. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, occupies a markedly different tier: annual manufacturing capacity exceeds 80 GW, and the company has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 designation continuously for over a decade, consistently ranking among the world's top five module producers. On institutional footprint and lender acceptance, Trina Solar holds a clear and well-documented advantage.

RedSolar's portfolio spans crystalline silicon modules for residential, commercial and industrial, and utility-scale segments, organized around what the company calls a "1+3+N" business model combining module production, system integration, and energy services. Its state-backed research heritage also extends to in-house module testing and engineering support. Trina Solar's offer is anchored by its Vertex line, built on n-type TOPCon cell technology. The Vertex N and Vertex N Ultra target large ground-mount and utility-scale projects - the flagship module delivers 760 W at 24.5% efficiency. The Vertex S+ G3 addresses residential and commercial rooftop needs, with a full-black variant and a hail- and wind-resistant option suited to demanding climates and planning requirements.

For most buyers - residential owners, commercial developers, or utility procurement teams - Trina Solar is the more defensible default. Its decade-long Tier 1 status satisfies lender due diligence, its supply chain scale ensures module availability, and the Vertex series covers every deployment context. RedSolar is a credible manufacturer with legitimate research credentials and may suit cost-sensitive buyers in markets where CETC's institutional relationships carry commercial weight. Without confirmed Tier 1 bankability, however, it is harder to recommend for financed projects where lender approval of the module brand is a non-negotiable prerequisite.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [RedSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [RedSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [RedSolar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.