---
title: "RedSolar vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare RedSolar vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-akcome"
---

# RedSolar vs AKCOME

RedSolar has the broader catalog (41 vs 3 models). RedSolar leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | RedSolar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Changsha | Suzhou |
| Founded | 2008 | 2003 |
| Employees | 1000-2000 |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.red-solar.com](https://www.red-solar.com) | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |

Hunan Red Solar New Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (RedSolar) is a state-owned high-tech enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation (CETC), one of China's largest Fortune 500 state-owned conglomerates. The company manufactures solar cells, PV modules...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | RedSolar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 41 | 3 | +38 |
| Max Power | 720 W | 700 W | +20 W |
| Avg Power | 582 W | 672 W | +90 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | RedSolar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 22.54% | +0.66 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.36% | 21.63% | +0.73 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | RedSolar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.303%/°C | -0.240%/°C | +0.063 |
| Bifacial Share | 36 (88%) | 3 (100%) | +12 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 29.4 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +0.6 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

RedSolar skews to higher efficiency: 10% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | RedSolar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 2 (4.9%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 4 (9.8%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 31 (75.6%) | 1 (33.3%) |
| 23%+ | 4 (9.8%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | RedSolar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 10 (24.4%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 6 (14.6%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 20 (48.8%) | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 5 (12.2%) | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (83%)

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | RedSolar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 34 (82.9%) | 0 |
| PERC | 5 (12.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 2 (4.9%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, RedSolar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [CETC-720T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-720t-gdf-132) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [CETC-715T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-715t-gdf-132) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [CETC-710T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-710t-gdf-132) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [CETC-705T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-705t-gdf-132) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [CETC-700T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-700t-gdf-132) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [CETC-695T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-695t-gdf-132) | 695 | 22.4 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [CETC-690T(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-690t-gdf-132) | 690 | 22.2 | -0.310 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [CETC-640T(GDF)/156](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-640t-gdf-156) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [CETC-635T(GDF)/156](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-635t-gdf-156) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [CETC-635TR(GDF)/132](https://comparepv.com/panel/redsolar-cetc-635tr-gdf-132) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

AKCOME is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Zhejiang province, with roots in PV modules and mounting systems. The company held a Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability rating in 2022, though its Jiangsu division was removed from that list by 2024, a signal of financial uncertainties that prospective buyers and lenders should weigh. Reported module production capacity stands at roughly 3.8 GW per year. RedSolar - formally Hunan RedSolar New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. - was founded in 2008 as a state-owned enterprise incubated by the 48th Research Institute of China's CETC group, drawing on decades of semiconductor expertise. RedSolar reports cell and module production capacity in the 3.5-3.6 GW range and claims delivery of over 30 GW of products across more than 50 countries. Neither brand belongs to the top tier of globally recognized names in 2025, though RedSolar's state-backed institutional origin gives it a somewhat more stable ownership structure.

AKCOME built a reputation around heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, which tends to deliver higher temperature performance and low degradation rates. However, the brand was delisted from TaiyangNews top-module rankings in early 2025 due to an inaccessible company website - raising transparency concerns for commercial buyers. RedSolar's catalog centers on monocrystalline PERC modules and progresses toward higher-efficiency formats, targeting commercial rooftop, industrial, and utility-scale ground-mount applications. Its products appear mainly in project-oriented procurement channels rather than retail-facing residential markets in North America or Western Europe.

For a typical buyer in 2025, neither manufacturer stands out as a default recommendation over established Tier 1 names. RedSolar's state-backed structure and consistent supply-chain presence give it a marginal edge in stability, while AKCOME's HJT focus is technically appealing but undermined by the recent delisting and reduced bankability standing. Buyers requiring long-term warranty enforcement should verify the financial health of either brand carefully before committing.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarquotes.com.au/panels/akcome-review.html \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review - SolarQuotes Australia \| review

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/akcome \| AKCOME Solar Panels Review 2026 - Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://hjtpv.com/hjt-producers/akcome-solar-panel/ \| AKCOME HJT Solar Panel overview - HJT PV Modules \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/redsolar-1 \| Hunan RedSolar New Energy Technology Co. - ENF Solar \| article

\- https://www.solarfeeds.com/biz/hunan-red-solar-new-energy-science-and-t/ \| Red Solar Company Overview - Production Capacity and Tier 1 status \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [RedSolar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [RedSolar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [RedSolar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/redsolar-vs-akcome

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.