---
title: "Recom vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Recom vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/recom-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Recom vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 61 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Recom | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | Italy | China |
| Headquarters | Bolzano | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2007 | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.recom-tech.com](https://www.recom-tech.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Recom | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 61 | 340 | +279 |
| Max Power | 730 W | 760 W | +30 W |
| Avg Power | 548 W | 520 W | +27 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Recom | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 24.30% | 24.80% | +0.50 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 22.68% | 21.71% | +0.97 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Recom | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.284%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.018 |
| Bifacial Share | 23 (38%) | 145 (43%) | +5 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 30.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.8 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Recom skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Recom | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 5 (8.2%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 36 (59.0%) | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 20 (32.8%) | 76 (22.4%) |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |


## Power distribution

Recom offers more 600W+ panels (36% of lineup)


| Power band | Recom | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 34 (55.7%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (8.2%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 12 (19.7%) | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 10 (16.4%) | 44 (12.9%) |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (84%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Recom | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 51 (83.6%) | 248 (72.9%) |
| HJT | 5 (8.2%) | 0 |
| N-type | 5 (8.2%) | 6 (1.8%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Recom


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RCM-730-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-730-8dbnm) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RCM-725-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-725-8dbnm) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RCM-720-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-720-8dbnm) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RCM-715-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8dbnm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RCM-715-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-715-8nm) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RCM-710-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8dbnm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RCM-710-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-710-8nm) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RCM-705-8DBNM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8dbnm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RCM-705-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-705-8nm) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RCM-700-8NM](https://comparepv.com/panel/recom-rcm-700-8nm) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Recom is a European solar panel manufacturer headquartered in Italy, operating in a production facility with roots dating to 1965 - a plant previously run by Bosch. Now operating under the Recom-Sillia entity, the company holds Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status and is widely cited as the only Bloomberg Tier 1 PV module manufacturer based in Europe, with an annual production capacity exceeding 3.2 GW and a distribution footprint spanning over 110 countries. Trina Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 1997 and headquartered in Changzhou, operating at an entirely different scale: annual production capacity exceeds 80 GW, and cumulative global module shipments surpassed 260 GW by the end of 2024. Both companies hold confirmed Bloomberg Tier 1 status, but Trina Solar's institutional footprint - in terms of financed projects, supply-chain depth, and global installer familiarity - is substantially larger.

In product terms, Recom covers the full range from residential rooftop to utility-scale ground-mount, offering a broad technology portfolio that includes TOPCon modules (Lynx series), HJT modules (Lion series), and back-contact technology, with product warranties extending to 30 years on premium lines. This technology breadth gives buyers flexibility across different performance and budget tiers. Trina Solar focuses its residential and commercial offering on the Vertex S+ platform, now in its third generation, using N-type TOPCon cells with efficiency up to 22.5% and annual degradation as low as 0.4%. For utility-scale applications, Trina's bifacial NEG series modules reach outputs of up to 760 W per panel, cementing the company's position in large project pipelines.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the lower-risk default: its scale translates into stronger supply continuity, deeper installer networks, and more extensive field data from deployed projects. Recom becomes the more compelling choice when European manufacturing origin is a priority - increasingly relevant under evolving trade policy, carbon footprint accounting, and public procurement rules in the EU. The two brands are not interchangeable in strategic terms: Trina competes primarily on scale and supply reliability, while Recom competes on provenance, technology diversity, and premium warranty terms.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Recom vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/recom-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Recom vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/recom-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Recom vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/recom-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/recom-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.