--- title: "REC vs AEET - Brand Comparison | ComparePV" description: "Compare REC vs AEET solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background." source: "https://comparepv.com/rec-vs-aeet" --- # REC vs AEET REC has the broader catalog (58 vs 5 models). REC leads on peak efficiency at 22.80%. REC leans bifacial (59% of lineup). ## The two companies | Attribute | REC | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | Country | Norway | | | Headquarters | Sandvika | | | Founded | 1996 | | | Employees | | | | Annual capacity | | | | Tier 1 | yes | no | | Listed | | | | Website | [https://www.recgroup.com](https://www.recgroup.com) | | ## Catalog & Power | Measure | REC | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Panel Models | 58 | 5 | +53 | | Max Power | 640 W | 200 W | +440 W | | Avg Power | 385 W | 190 W | +195 W | ## Efficiency | Measure | REC | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Max Efficiency | 22.80% | 15.70% | +7.10 pp | | Avg Efficiency | 18.92% | 14.90% | +4.02 pp | ## Reliability & Warranty | Measure | REC | AEET | Margin | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.300%/°C | - | | | Bifacial Share | 34 (59%) | 0 (0%) | +59 pp | | Avg Warranty | 25.5 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +0.5 yr | ## Efficiency distribution | Efficiency band | REC | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<20% | 20 (34.5%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 20-21% | 8 (13.8%) | 0 | | 21-22% | 15 (25.9%) | 0 | | 22-23% | 15 (25.9%) | 0 | ## Power distribution REC offers more 600W+ panels (17% of lineup) | Power band | REC | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | \<400W | 21 (36.2%) | 5 (100.0%) | | 400-499W | 26 (44.8%) | 0 | | 500-599W | 1 (1.7%) | 0 | | 600-699W | 10 (17.2%) | 0 | ## Cell technology Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (59%) Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%) | Technology | REC | AEET | | --- | --- | --- | | HJT | 34 (58.6%) | 0 | | Unknown | 22 (37.9%) | 0 | | N-type | 2 (3.4%) | 0 | | PERC | 0 | 5 (100.0%) | ## Top panels, REC | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [REC640AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec640aa-pro-m) | 640 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [REC640AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec640aa-pro-mg) | 640 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [REC630AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec630aa-pro-m) | 630 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [REC630AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec630aa-pro-mg) | 630 | 22.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [REC620AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec620aa-pro-m) | 620 | 21.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 6 | [REC620AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec620aa-pro-mg) | 620 | 21.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 7 | [REC610AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec610aa-pro-m) | 610 | 21.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 8 | [REC610AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec610aa-pro-mg) | 610 | 21.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 9 | [REC600AA PRO M](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec600aa-pro-m) | 600 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | | 10 | [REC600AA Pro MG](https://comparepv.com/panel/rec-rec600aa-pro-mg) | 600 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline | ## Top panels, AEET | # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | [SE200M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se200m-24-f) | 200 | 15.7 | - | Monocrystalline | | 2 | [SE195M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se195m-24-f) | 195 | 15.3 | - | Monocrystalline | | 3 | [SE190M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se190m-24-f) | 190 | 14.9 | - | Monocrystalline | | 4 | [SE185M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se185m-24-f) | 185 | 14.5 | - | Monocrystalline | | 5 | [SE180M(24)F](https://comparepv.com/panel/aeet-se180m-24-f) | 180 | 14.1 | - | Monocrystalline | ## Summary REC Group is a solar manufacturer with Norwegian roots, founded in 1996 as Renewable Energy Corporation, with its primary production base now located in Singapore and acquired by India's Reliance Industries in 2021. That acquisition opened investment for expansion toward 5 GW of global capacity, adding planned facilities in France and the United States to the existing Singapore plant, which produced around 1.4 GW in 2022. REC has carried Bloomberg Tier 1 bankability status for years and landed in SolarReviews' top-ten brand rankings for 2025, though analysts noted some financial headwinds connected to declining shipment volumes during that period. AEET Energy Group GmbH is a German-headquartered manufacturer founded in 2003 and based in Konigsbrunn, Bavaria, distributing panels across more than 95 countries from production sites in China, Georgia, and Turkey, with stated annual capacity of around 2.5 GW. AEET also holds Bloomberg Tier 1 status and received the Kiwa PVEL Top Performer Award in 2025, giving it credible independent validation. In terms of institutional brand recognition and vertically integrated manufacturing heritage, REC holds the stronger footprint globally. On the product side, REC is best known for its Alpha series, built on heterojunction (HJT) cell technology, which underpins the brand's industry-leading temperature coefficient of -0.24 percent per degree Celsius and one of the lowest degradation rates among mainstream manufacturers. These characteristics make REC a natural fit for premium residential rooftops and high-performance commercial installations where long-term yield matters more than upfront cost. AEET's catalog spans both established P-type PERC modules and, confirmed by PV Magazine's five-star rating for its N-type TOPCon line, newer high-efficiency product families. AEET's 30-year product warranty on select ranges is longer than what most competitors including REC offer, and the brand is positioned across residential, commercial, and utility-scale segments at a competitive mid-to-premium price point. For a typical buyer in 2025, REC is the safer choice where premium efficiency and long-term yield guarantees justify a higher per-watt cost, particularly for residential HJT installations. AEET is a credible alternative for cost-sensitive commercial or utility projects requiring a Tier 1 bankable supplier with solid independent test results - the two brands are not interchangeable at the premium end, but AEET closes the gap considerably in value-oriented applications. \---LINKS--- \- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/rec-solar-panels-complete-review \| REC Solar Panels 2025 Expert Review - SolarReviews \| review \- https://www.recgroup.com/en/news/norwegian-solar-energy-company-rec-group-becomes-part-reliance-industries-ltd-and-accelerates \| REC Group joins Reliance Industries and accelerates expansion \| article \- https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group \| AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide 2025 \| review \- https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet \| AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar manufacturer profile \| article \- https://www.thisoldhouse.com/solar-alternative-energy/rec-solar-panels-review \| REC Solar Panels Review 2026 - This Old House \| review Sources: \- \[2025 Expert Review Of REC Solar Panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/rec-solar-panels-complete-review) \- \[REC Group joins Reliance Industries\](https://www.recgroup.com/en/news/norwegian-solar-energy-company-rec-group-becomes-part-reliance-industries-ltd-and-accelerates) \- \[AEET Energy Group - EnergyPal Buyer's Guide\](https://energypal.com/best-solar-panels-for-homes/aeet-energy-group) \- \[AEET Energy Group GmbH - ENF Solar\](https://www.enfsolar.com/aeet) \- \[REC Solar Panels Review - This Old House\](https://www.thisoldhouse.com/solar-alternative-energy/rec-solar-panels-review) Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above. ## Other comparisons - [REC vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/rec-vs-a-b-energy) - [AE Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-aeet) - [REC vs AIKO](https://comparepv.com/rec-vs-aiko) - [AKCOME vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/akcome-vs-aeet) - [REC vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/rec-vs-artsolar) - [ASM vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-aeet) --- Source: https://comparepv.com/rec-vs-aeet Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.