---
title: "Rarlon PV Tech vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Rarlon PV Tech vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/rarlon-pv-tech-vs-trina-solar"
---

# Rarlon PV Tech vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 52 models). Trina Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.80%. Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Ningbo | Changzhou |
| Founded |  | 1997 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 |  | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [http://www.rarlonsolar.com](http://www.rarlonsolar.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

Rarlon PV Tech, also known as Rarlon Solar, has specialized in the solar field for over 10 years. They are a professional manufacturer and supplier of green energy products, engaging in the production and installation of solar panels, solar systems, and solar projects. Their products are exported to various countries...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 52 | 340 | +288 |
| Max Power | 550 W | 760 W | +210 W |
| Avg Power | 351 W | 520 W | +169 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 21.50% | 24.80% | +3.30 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 18.33% | 21.71% | +3.38 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.439%/°C | -0.302%/°C | +0.137 |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 25.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +3.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 40 (76.9%) | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 9 (17.3%) | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 3 (5.8%) | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 42 (80.8%) | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 5 (9.6%) | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 5 (9.6%) | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (77%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | Rarlon PV Tech | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 40 (76.9%) | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 12 (23.1%) | 11 (3.2%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Rarlon PV Tech


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [RL550HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl550hm) | 550 | 21.5 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [RL545HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl545hm) | 545 | 21.3 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [RL540HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl540hm) | 540 | 21.1 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [RL535HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl535hm) | 535 | 20.9 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [RL530HM](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl530hm) | 530 | 20.7 | -0.470 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [RL420HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl420hm-144) | 420 | 20.9 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [RL415HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl415hm-144) | 415 | 20.6 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [RL410HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl410hm-144) | 410 | 20.4 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [RL405HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl405hm-144) | 405 | 20.2 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [RL400HM-144](https://comparepv.com/panel/rarlon-pv-tech-rl400hm-144) | 400 | 20.0 | -0.390 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Rarlon PV Tech, incorporated as Ningbo Rarlon Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd. and headquartered in Ningbo, China, has been active in photovoltaic manufacturing for over 15 years. The company holds TUV, CE, and ISO9001 certifications and exports panels to Europe, South America, the Middle East, Africa, and Southeast Asia. Rarlon does not appear on Bloomberg New Energy Finance's Tier 1 bankability lists, which is a material limitation for any project requiring institutional financing or lender sign-off. Trina Solar, founded in 1997 in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, is one of the world's largest PV manufacturers. The company has held Tier 1 BloombergNEF status for multiple consecutive years and earned Top Performer recognition from PVEL for 11 consecutive years. According to pv-magazine, Trina Solar shipped 65.21 GW of solar panels in 2023 alone - a scale that confirms its place among the global top tier. On institutional footprint and bankability, the two companies are in different categories.

Rarlon PV Tech's catalog covers monocrystalline modules from 50 W to 660 W, including half-cell MBB variants, positioned as cost-accessible options for price-sensitive markets and smaller installations. The brand is listed in distributor directories but does not appear in independent industry reviews covering top residential or commercial panel choices. Trina Solar operates a purpose-built family of product lines. The Vertex S+ series targets residential and light commercial rooftop applications using N-type TOPCon cells, with outputs up to 485 W and module efficiency up to 22.3%. For utility-scale and C&I ground-mount projects, Trina offers bifacial dual-glass modules in the Vertex and NEG21 series; the NEG21 reaches up to 760 W and 24.5% efficiency as reported by pv-magazine. This range covers the full spectrum from a single-family rooftop to a multi-hundred-megawatt solar farm.

For most international buyers - whether sourcing panels for residential systems, commercial rooftops, or large-scale projects - Trina Solar is the clearly stronger default, backed by verified bankability, a mature TOPCon lineup, and a diversified global supply chain. Rarlon PV Tech may suit procurement driven purely by upfront cost where Tier 1 status is not a contractual requirement, but the absence of BloombergNEF recognition and independent long-term field data is a real constraint. For any institutionally financed project, these two brands are not interchangeable.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Rarlon PV Tech vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/rarlon-pv-tech-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [Rarlon PV Tech vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/rarlon-pv-tech-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [Rarlon PV Tech vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/rarlon-pv-tech-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/rarlon-pv-tech-vs-trina-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.