---
title: "QSun Solar vs AKCOME - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare QSun Solar vs AKCOME solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/qsun-solar-vs-akcome"
---

# QSun Solar vs AKCOME

AKCOME has the broader catalog (3 vs 0 models). AKCOME leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | QSun Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country |  | China |
| Headquarters |  | Suzhou |
| Founded |  | 2003 |
| Employees |  |  |
| Annual capacity |  |  |
| Tier 1 | no | no |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website |  | [https://www.akcome.com](https://www.akcome.com) |


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | QSun Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 3 | +3 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 700 W | +700 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 672 W | +672 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | QSun Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 22.54% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.63% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | QSun Solar | AKCOME | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.240%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 3 (100%) | +100 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 30.0 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution


| Efficiency band | QSun Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 21-22% | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Power distribution

AKCOME offers more 600W+ panels (100% of lineup)


| Power band | QSun Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 600-699W | 0 | 2 (66.7%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 1 (33.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **HJT** (100%)


| Technology | QSun Solar | AKCOME |
| --- | --- | --- |
| HJT | 0 | 3 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, AKCOME


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SKA611HDGDC-700W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-700w) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SKA611HDGDC-660W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-660w) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SKA611HDGDC-655W](https://comparepv.com/panel/akcome-ska611hdgdc-655w) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-SUN Solar is a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2014 and headquartered in Nanjing, Jiangsu, operating manufacturing hubs delivering more than 4 GW of modules annually to customers in over 50 countries. AKCOME, also based in China (Jiangsu province, part of the Jiangsu Akcome Industrial Group), had a longer public profile and reached BloombergNEF Tier 1 status as recently as the second quarter of 2024, with historical module capacity cited around 9.4 GW at its peak, but the company's fortunes collapsed sharply afterward: it halted several subsidiary factories in mid-2024, was delisted from the Shenzhen Stock Exchange after its shares fell below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, and a subsidiary entered court-supervised bankruptcy reorganization in July 2024 amid the broader Chinese solar overcapacity crisis. On institutional footing, Q-SUN currently presents the steadier and more active manufacturing base, while AKCOME's Tier 1 credentials are now largely historical.

Q-SUN's product lineup is built around N-type TOPCon technology, with its Onyx series offering full-black, half-cut bifacial double-glass modules aimed at aesthetic residential and commercial rooftops, and its Mercury series covering a broader wattage range for commercial and utility-scale use. AKCOME's historical catalog, prior to its 2024 troubles, also centered on N-type high-efficiency cells and covered module and cell manufacturing at scale for utility and commercial projects, but with the Changxing base and other facilities disrupted, current product availability and long-term supply continuity are far less certain than they were during its Tier 1 period.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q-SUN is the more defensible default: it has an active, functioning manufacturing operation and a current TOPCon-based product range, whereas AKCOME's bankruptcy proceedings and stock delisting raise real concerns about warranty servicing and long-term parts or replacement support, regardless of its past Tier 1 recognition. Buyers considering AKCOME should treat any residual inventory with caution and verify current operational status directly before purchase.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2024/06/17/akcome-halts-some-manufacturing-faces-possible-chinese-stock-delisting/ \| Akcome halts manufacturing, faces possible Chinese stock delisting \| article

\- https://energynews.oedigital.com/environment/2024/07/30/chinese-solar-company-akcomes-subsidiary-declares-personal-bankruptcy-amidst-plunging-prices-overcapacity \| Akcome subsidiary declares bankruptcy amid price glut and overcapacity \| article

\- https://www.energyconnects.com/news/renewables/2024/july/chinese-solar-firm-forced-into-bankruptcy-as-glut-deepens/ \| Chinese solar firm forced into bankruptcy as glut deepens \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/q-sun-solar \| Q-SUN Anhui Co., Ltd manufacturer profile \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/topmodules/top-solar-modules-listing-january-2025 \| TOP Solar Modules Listing - January 2025 \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [QSun Solar vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/qsun-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-akcome)
- [QSun Solar vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/qsun-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-akcome)
- [QSun Solar vs ARTsolar](https://comparepv.com/qsun-solar-vs-artsolar)
- [ASM vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/asm-vs-akcome)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/qsun-solar-vs-akcome

