---
title: "QN-SOLAR vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare QN-SOLAR vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# QN-SOLAR vs Vikram Solar

Vikram Solar has the broader catalog (202 vs 0 models). Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | India |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Kolkata |
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| Employees | 5000-10000 | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity | 30-40 GW/year | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.qn-solarpv.com](https://www.qn-solarpv.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

QN-SOLAR (Qn-SOLAR PV Limited) is a China-based integrated photovoltaic manufacturer with six production bases across China, specializing in N-TOPCon solar cells and modules. The company officially launched its global business in 2022 and has expanded into upstream and downstream PV production, reaching a combined...

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 202 | +202 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 735 W | +735 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 553 W | +553 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 23.69% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.45% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.334%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 150 (74%) | +74 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.6 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Vikram Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | QN-SOLAR | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 0 | 152 (75.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 30 (14.9%) |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (5.9%) |
| TOPCon | 0 | 8 (4.0%) |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

QN-SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, founded around 2021 as a specialist N-type TOPCon producer with several manufacturing bases across China. It is not yet on BloombergNEF's Tier 1 list, though industry reporting indicates the company has been actively working toward that status, with several of its financed projects already meeting BNEF's Tier 1 criteria. Vikram Solar, by contrast, is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2005 and headquartered in Kolkata, with facilities in West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, and has held BloombergNEF Tier 1 status for multiple consecutive quarters. Its annual nameplate manufacturing capacity has grown substantially through 2025, reportedly reaching around 9.5 GW, giving it a larger and more established production footprint than the newer QN-SOLAR. Overall, Vikram Solar currently has the stronger and more verifiable institutional footprint, backed by two decades of operating history and a confirmed bankability rating, while QN-SOLAR is a younger, technology-focused entrant still building that track record.

Both companies center their product lines on N-type TOPCon bifacial modules, reflecting the industry's broader shift away from PERC. QN-SOLAR markets full-black TOPCon bifacial panels aimed at premium residential and commercial rooftops where aesthetics and efficiency are priorities. Vikram Solar offers a more diversified lineup spanning its Hypersol series of TOPCon bifacial modules alongside a Mono PERC bifacial Paradea series, allowing it to serve residential, commercial, and utility-scale ground-mount projects with a wider range of price points and technology options.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Vikram Solar is generally the safer default choice, given its confirmed Tier 1 bankability, longer operating history, and broader product and project portfolio spanning residential to utility scale. QN-SOLAR may appeal to buyers specifically seeking premium full-black TOPCon aesthetics or who are working with suppliers already familiar with the brand, but its lack of confirmed Tier 1 status means more due diligence is warranted, particularly for financed or utility-scale projects where bankability matters most.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.vikramsolar.com/press-releases/vikram-solar-ranked-in-bnefs-tier-1-module-manufacturers-list/ \| Vikram Solar re-enters BloombergNEF's Tier 1 Module Manufacturers List \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine-india.com/press-releases/vikram-solar-ranked-in-bnefs-tier-1-module-manufacturers-list/ \| Vikram Solar ranked in BNEF's Tier 1 Module Manufacturers List \| article

\- https://renewablewatch.in/2025/02/20/vikram-solar-gets-1-gw-capacity-boost-upgrades-facility-with-superior-efficiency-solar-modules/ \| Vikram Solar gets 1 GW capacity boost, upgrades facility \| article

\- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikram\_Solar \| Vikram Solar - company history, founding and facilities \| article

\- https://www.enfsolar.com/qn-solar \| Qn-Solar PV Limited profile - China-based module manufacturer \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [QN-SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [QN-SOLAR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [QN-SOLAR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-vikram-solar