---
title: "QN-SOLAR vs Trina Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare QN-SOLAR vs Trina Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-trina-solar"
---

# QN-SOLAR vs Trina Solar

Trina Solar has the broader catalog (340 vs 0 models). Trina Solar leans bifacial (43% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Changzhou |
| Founded | 2014 | 1997 |
| Employees | 5000-10000 |  |
| Annual capacity | 30-40 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.qn-solarpv.com](https://www.qn-solarpv.com) | [https://www.trinasolar.com](https://www.trinasolar.com) |

QN-SOLAR (Qn-SOLAR PV Limited) is a China-based integrated photovoltaic manufacturer with six production bases across China, specializing in N-TOPCon solar cells and modules. The company officially launched its global business in 2022 and has expanded into upstream and downstream PV production, reaching a combined...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 340 | +340 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 760 W | +760 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 520 W | +520 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.80% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 21.71% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.302%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 145 (43%) | +43 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 28.2 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Trina Solar skews to higher efficiency: 22% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 0 | 22 (6.5%) |
| 20-21% | 0 | 57 (16.8%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 83 (24.4%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 102 (30.0%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 76 (22.4%) |


## Power distribution

Trina Solar offers more 600W+ panels (34% of lineup)


| Power band | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 0 | 28 (8.2%) |
| 400-499W | 0 | 142 (41.8%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 54 (15.9%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 72 (21.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 44 (12.9%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (73%)


| Technology | QN-SOLAR | Trina Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| TOPCon | 0 | 248 (72.9%) |
| PERC | 0 | 75 (22.1%) |
| Unknown | 0 | 11 (3.2%) |
| N-type | 0 | 6 (1.8%) |


## Top panels, Trina Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-760](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-760) | 760 | 24.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-755](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-755) | 755 | 24.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-750](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-750) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-745](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-745) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [TSM-NEG21C.20-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-co-ltd-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [TSM-NEG21C.20 735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [TSM-NEG21C.20Q-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/trina-solar-tsm-neg21c-20q-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

QN-SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai, founded in 2014 as an EPC contractor before pivoting to module production in 2021 and formally launching its global PV business in 2022. With four manufacturing bases across China and a reported annual module capacity of around 25 GW as of 2024, QN-SOLAR has scaled up rapidly for a relatively young brand. However, it does not appear on publicly accessible BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability lists, which limits its appeal for project-financed or institutionally governed developments. Trina Solar occupies a fundamentally different market tier - founded in 1997 in Changzhou, China, it shipped approximately 77 GW in 2024, placing it third globally alongside JA Solar. Trina holds confirmed Tier 1 status and has earned PVEL Top Performer recognition for eleven consecutive years, giving it a substantially stronger institutional footprint than QN-SOLAR at this stage.

In terms of product range, QN-SOLAR offers modules spanning roughly 395W to 610W and has adopted TOPCon cell technology across part of its lineup. Average module efficiency is reported at around 21.4%, with leading models reaching 23.0%, making the brand a plausible option for residential rooftop and small commercial installations where price competitiveness matters. Trina Solar structures its offer around two flagship lines: the Vertex N series, targeting utility-scale ground-mount and C&I applications with TOPCon modules exceeding 760W output and up to 24.5% efficiency, and the Vertex S+ series, aimed at residential and smaller commercial rooftop projects. A Full Black variant within the Vertex S+ G3 line also addresses the growing demand for aesthetically integrated residential installations.

For most international buyers, Trina Solar is the more defensible default - particularly for any project involving bank financing, long-term asset management, or insurance underwriting, where Tier 1 status and a decades-long track record carry real weight. QN-SOLAR may suit price-sensitive buyers or integrators with existing supply relationships, but buyers who require maximum institutional assurance should lean toward Trina Solar until QN-SOLAR builds a comparably long performance history.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [QN-SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-trina-solar)
- [QN-SOLAR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-trina-solar)
- [QN-SOLAR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Trina Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-trina-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-trina-solar