---
title: "QN-SOLAR vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare QN-SOLAR vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-runergy"
---

# QN-SOLAR vs Runergy

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 0 models). Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | QN-SOLAR | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | China | China |
| Headquarters | Shanghai | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 2014 | 2013 |
| Employees | 5000-10000 | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 30-40 GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | no | yes |
| Listed |  |  |
| Website | [https://www.qn-solarpv.com](https://www.qn-solarpv.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

QN-SOLAR (Qn-SOLAR PV Limited) is a China-based integrated photovoltaic manufacturer with six production bases across China, specializing in N-TOPCon solar cells and modules. The company officially launched its global business in 2022 and has expanded into upstream and downstream PV production, reaching a combined...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 0 | 124 | +124 |
| Max Power | 0 W | 740 W | +740 W |
| Avg Power | 0 W | 579 W | +579 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | - | 24.10% |  |
| Avg Efficiency | - | 22.42% |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | QN-SOLAR | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | - | -0.298%/°C |  |
| Bifacial Share | 0 (0%) | 95 (77%) | +77 pp |
| Avg Warranty | - | 29.1 yrs |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | QN-SOLAR | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 20-21% | 0 | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 0 | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 0 | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 0 | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | QN-SOLAR | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 400-499W | 0 | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 0 | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 0 | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | QN-SOLAR | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| N-type | 0 | 74 (59.7%) |
| PERC | 0 | 32 (25.8%) |
| HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced information for both brands now.

QN-SOLAR is a Chinese manufacturer headquartered in Shanghai that launched its global PV business in 2022, giving it a much shorter operating history than most established Tier 1 players. By 2024 the company reported an annual production capacity of roughly 20 GW of PV cells and 25 GW of modules across four manufacturing bases in China, and it markets itself as an N-TOPCon specialist while also exploring perovskite technology for future generations. As of recent reporting, QN-SOLAR has confirmed several projects meeting BloombergNEF's Tier 1 criteria but has not yet secured full BNEF Tier 1 manufacturer status, meaning its bankability track record is still being built. Runergy, also Chinese and based in Jiangsu, has a longer and more established manufacturing footprint, having shipped over 65 GW of solar cells cumulatively by the end of 2023 and targeting around 63 GW of cell capacity with 23 GW of module capacity by the end of 2024. Runergy has been confirmed on the BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer list for multiple consecutive quarters and has also achieved a BB rating in the PV ModuleTech bankability report, giving it a notably stronger and better-documented institutional footprint than QN-SOLAR.

Both companies center their product lines on TOPCon (n-type Tunnel Oxide Passivated Contact) cell technology, which has become the industry-standard successor to PERC due to higher efficiency and lower degradation. QN-SOLAR's panels span roughly 395W to 610W, with an average efficiency near 21.4% and top models around 23.0%, and the lineup includes a substantial share of bifacial modules suited to ground-mounted and commercial installations alongside residential rooftop options. Runergy's catalog is broader, with around 98 listed panel models averaging about 22.2% efficiency and top performers reaching roughly 23.8%, reflecting a product strategy that spans residential rooftops through utility-scale ground-mount deployments, backed by its larger-scale cell manufacturing base.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Runergy is the safer default given its confirmed, multi-quarter BloombergNEF Tier 1 status and larger, more mature production scale, which translates into stronger financing acceptance for larger or utility-scale projects. QN-SOLAR is a newer entrant with competitive technical specifications and an aggressive TOPCon-focused roadmap, but its bankability credentials are still in progress, so it may suit buyers prioritizing price or efficiency on smaller residential or commercial jobs where full Tier 1 financing status is less critical.

\---LINKS---

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/qn-solar \| QN-SOLAR Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

\- https://www.qn-solarpv.com/?News%2F328.html= \| Qn-SOLAR: Progress Towards BNEF Tier 1 Solar Module Manufacturer \| article

\- https://www.runergy.com/runergy-achieves-bnef-tier-1-pv-module-maker-status-for-six-consecutive-quarters/ \| Runergy Achieves BNEF Tier 1 Status for Six Consecutive Quarters \| article

\- https://www.runergy.com/runergy-upgraded-to-bb-rating-in-q2-2024-pv-moduletech-bankability-report/ \| Runergy Upgraded to BB Rating in Q2 2024 PV ModuleTech Report \| article

\- https://comparepv.com/reviews/runergy \| Runergy Solar Panels Review 2026: Pros, Cons and Specs \| review

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [QN-SOLAR vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [QN-SOLAR vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [QN-SOLAR vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/qn-solar-vs-runergy