---
title: "Q-Cells vs Zonergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Zonergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-zonergy"
---

# Q-Cells vs Zonergy

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 5 models). Q-Cells leads on peak efficiency at 23.20%. Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Zigong, Sichuan |
| Founded | 1999 | 2007 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 201-300 |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | null GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL |  |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [http://www.zonergy.com](http://www.zonergy.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Zonergy is a world-renowned enterprise specializing in smart microgrid integrated solutions. The company is committed to providing first-class smart micro-grid solutions for global customers, covering technology research and development, product production, sales and trade, engineering design and implementation, and...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 5 | +84 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 460 W | +215 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 450 W | +18 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 21.16% | +2.04 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 20.70% | +0.51 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Zonergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.350%/°C | +0.025 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 0 (0%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 25.0 yrs | +2.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 4 (80.0%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 1 (20.0%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (100%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Zonergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Zonergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [ZPM 460MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-460mh3-72) | 460 | 21.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [ZPM 455MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-455mh3-72) | 455 | 20.9 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [ZPM 450MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-450mh3-72) | 450 | 20.7 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [ZPM 445MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-445mh3-72) | 445 | 20.5 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [ZPM 440MH3-72](https://comparepv.com/panel/zonergy-zpm-440mh3-72) | 440 | 20.2 | -0.350 | Monocrystalline |


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-zonergy)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-zonergy)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Zonergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-zonergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-zonergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.