---
title: "Q-Cells vs Yingli - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Yingli solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-yingli"
---

# Q-Cells vs Yingli

Yingli has the broader catalog (196 vs 89 models). Yingli leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Yingli leans bifacial (57% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Baoding, Hebei |
| Founded | 1999 | 1998 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 9000+ |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 2.45 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL | OTC Pink: YGEHY |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [http://www.yinglisolar.com](http://www.yinglisolar.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Yingli Solar, also known as Yingli Green Energy, is a leading solar energy company and one of the world's largest vertically integrated PV manufacturers. The company develops, manufactures, and sells PV modules to a wide range of markets. Yingli's mission is to provide affordable green energy for all.


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 196 | +107 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 735 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 524 W | +56 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 24.10% | +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 21.28% | +0.06 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Yingli | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.330%/°C | +0.006 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 112 (57%) | +18 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 27.9 yrs | +0.9 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Yingli skews to higher efficiency: 21% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 30 (15.3%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 42 (21.4%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 44 (22.4%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 41 (20.9%) |


## Power distribution

Yingli offers more 600W+ panels (37% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 32 (16.3%) |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 52 (26.5%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 39 (19.9%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 62 (31.6%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 11 (5.6%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (32%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Yingli |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 63 (32.1%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 59 (30.1%) |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 20 (10.2%) |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 54 (27.6%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Yingli


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [YL735CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl735cf66-f-2) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [YL730CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl730cf66-f-2) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [YL725CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl725cf66-f-2) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [YL720CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl720cf66-f-2) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [LF720M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf720m12n-66h-bf) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [YL715CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl715cf66-f-2) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [LF715M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf715m12n-66h-bf) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [YL710CF66 f/2](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-yl710cf66-f-2) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [LF710M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf710m12n-66h-bf) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [LF705M12N-66H/BF](https://comparepv.com/panel/yingli-lf705m12n-66h-bf) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells was originally founded in 1999 in Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany, and acquired out of insolvency by South Korean conglomerate Hanwha Group in 2012, becoming Hanwha Q CELLS. Its global executive headquarters sits in Seoul, while its engineering and technology hub remains in Germany - a dual identity that reflects both its Korean financial backing and its European engineering heritage. The brand holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankable status and has scaled aggressively: total module shipments are anticipated to exceed 9 GW in 2025, and a multi-facility buildout in Georgia targets 8.4 GW of US domestic manufacturing capacity. Yingli Solar was founded in 1998 in Baoding, Hebei province, China, and rose to become the world's largest solar panel manufacturer by shipment volume in 2012 and 2013 before a prolonged debt crisis between 2015 and 2020 led to its delisting from the New York Stock Exchange and a comprehensive creditor-led restructuring. The company has since stabilized, regained Bloomberg Tier 1 status, and currently operates at an estimated production capacity of around 4 GW. On institutional footprint, financial depth, and supply chain scale, Hanwha Q CELLS holds the stronger position by a meaningful margin.

Hanwha Q CELLS serves residential, commercial, and utility markets through a tiered product portfolio built around N-type TOPCon cell technology. The Q.TRON series targets residential rooftops with efficiencies up to 22.5%, while the Q.ANTUM NEO range scales into larger-format commercial and industrial (C&I) and utility-scale ground-mount applications. US domestic manufacturing gives the brand a notable competitive advantage in markets where tariff exposure is a procurement concern. Yingli's current lineup centers on the Panda 3.0 series, which also relies on N-type TOPCon cells. The Panda 3.0 Pro serves residential and commercial rooftop segments at outputs around 630 W in large-format configurations, while the Panda 3.0 Plus scales up to 735 W in bifacial form using a G12 wafer format, targeting utility-scale developers. According to PV Magazine and TaiyangNews, Yingli's Panda 3.0 Pro achieved 22.28% efficiency at launch and the company's modules have performed competitively in independent reliability testing.

For most international buyers - whether specifying panels for residential rooftops or utility-scale procurement - Hanwha Q CELLS is the lower-risk default. Its larger balance sheet, geographically diversified factories, and uninterrupted operational history reduce counterparty risk in ways that Yingli, despite its genuine recovery, cannot yet fully match. That said, Yingli's Panda 3.0 series is technically credible, its Tier 1 status is restored, and for buyers with robust warranty insurance and a price differential to close, the two brands are functionally interchangeable on a per-watt performance basis.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-yingli)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-yingli)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Yingli](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-yingli)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-yingli

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.