---
title: "Q-Cells vs Waaree - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Waaree solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-waaree"
---

# Q-Cells vs Waaree

Waaree has the broader catalog (222 vs 89 models). Waaree leads on peak efficiency at 23.51%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | India |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Mumbai |
| Founded | 1999 | 1990 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 8500+ |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 13.3 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL | NSE: WAAREEENER |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.waaree.com/](https://www.waaree.com/) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Waaree Energies Ltd. is a leading global energy transition company committed to delivering innovative, high-quality solar and sustainable energy solutions. Established in 1990 and headquartered in Mumbai, India, the company operates across 20+ countries with an integrated portfolio that spans solar modules, EPC...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 222 | +133 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 730 W | +55 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 371 W | +97 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 23.51% | +0.31 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 18.39% | +2.82 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Waaree | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.362%/°C | +0.037 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 85 (38%) | +1 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 21.7 yrs | +5.3 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Waaree skews to higher efficiency: 4% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 139 (62.6%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 47 (21.2%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 14 (6.3%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 13 (5.9%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 9 (4.1%) |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 124 (55.9%) |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 35 (15.8%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 36 (16.2%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 20 (9.0%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 7 (3.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (48%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Waaree |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 107 (48.2%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 8 (3.6%) |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 88 (39.6%) |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 12 (5.4%) |
| HJT | 0 | 7 (3.2%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Waaree


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [BiH-11-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [BiH-11-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [BiH-11-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [BiH-11-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [BiH-11-710](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-710) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [BiH-11-705](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-705) | 705 | 22.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [BiH-11-700](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bih-11-700) | 700 | 22.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Bi-68-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-bi-68-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [WSMD-665](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-665) | 665 | 21.3 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [WSMD-660](https://comparepv.com/panel/waaree-wsmd-660) | 660 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells is a brand owned by South Korea's Hanwha Group, which acquired the originally German Q-Cells business in 2012. Operating under the Hanwha Q CELLS name, the company holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and runs approximately 11.3 GW of global annual module production capacity, including 8.4 GW in the United States - primarily at its Dalton, Georgia facility. Waaree Energies, founded in 1989 and headquartered in India, is that country's largest solar manufacturer. It has maintained Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status for 35 consecutive quarters and, in early 2025, became the first Indian company to earn PV Tech's ModuleTech Bankability 'A' rating. By late 2025, Waaree had lifted its total global manufacturing capacity to 22.3 GW across India and the United States, and achieved a record output of over 1 GW of modules in a single month. Q-Cells carries the stronger institutional brand recognition in Western markets; Waaree commands a dominant position in emerging markets and is actively expanding its international footprint.

Q-Cells' flagship line for the residential segment is the Q.TRON series, built on its proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO N-type cell architecture. The G2 variant has been confirmed at over 22.5% module efficiency, with the premium BLK configuration reaching up to 23.7% - making it a strong option for space-constrained residential rooftops where per-panel output is a priority. The company held the top residential market share position in the United States in 2025, with roughly a quarter of shipments. Waaree, by contrast, competes across all segments with its N-type TOPCon bifacial portfolio - the Elite, Arka, and Plexus families - covering standard residential wattages up to modules exceeding 730 W targeted at utility-scale ground-mount and large commercial rooftop applications. Its dual-glass bifacial panels are especially competitive in open-field and industrial settings where rear-side irradiance gains can meaningfully lift annual system yield.

For buyers in established Western markets, Q-Cells is the lower-risk default: deep installer networks, well-documented warranty service infrastructure, and a long track record in demanding regulatory environments. For cost-sensitive utility-scale procurement or projects in Eastern Europe - where Waaree is targeting aggressive expansion from 2026 onward, positioning itself as a non-Chinese supply-chain alternative under the EU Net-Zero Industry Act - the Indian manufacturer offers comparable bankability credentials with competitive pricing and substantial production scale. The better choice between the two hinges primarily on geography, channel access, and whether premium residential efficiency or utility-scale volume economics is the deciding factor.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-waaree)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-waaree)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Waaree](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-waaree)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-waaree

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.