---
title: "Q-Cells vs Vikram Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Vikram Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-vikram-solar"
---

# Q-Cells vs Vikram Solar

Vikram Solar has the broader catalog (202 vs 89 models). Vikram Solar leads on peak efficiency at 23.69%. Vikram Solar leans bifacial (74% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | India |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Kolkata |
| Founded | 1999 | 2005 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 1,895 |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 9.5 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL | NSE, BSE: VIKRAMSOLR |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [http://www.vikramsolar.com](http://www.vikramsolar.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Vikram Solar Limited is a leading Indian solar photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturer and solar solutions provider. They offer engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), and operations & maintenance (O&M) services for solar plants. The company manufactures high-efficiency solar PV modules and has a pan-India...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 202 | +113 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 735 W | +60 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 553 W | +85 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 23.69% | +0.49 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 21.45% | +0.23 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.334%/°C | +0.009 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 150 (74%) | +35 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 28.6 yrs | +1.7 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Vikram Solar skews to higher efficiency: 8% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 11 (5.4%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 42 (20.8%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 106 (52.5%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 27 (13.4%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 16 (7.9%) |


## Power distribution

Vikram Solar offers more 600W+ panels (42% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 12 (5.9%) |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 54 (26.7%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 52 (25.7%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 69 (34.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 15 (7.4%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (75%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Vikram Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 152 (75.2%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 30 (14.9%) |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 8 (4.0%) |
| HJT | 0 | 12 (5.9%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Vikram Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.735.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-735-05) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.730.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-730-05) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.725.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-725-05) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.720.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-720-05) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.715.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-715-05) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.AAA.05-715](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-aaa-05-715) | 715 | 23.0 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SURYAVA VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-suryava-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HYPERSOL VSMDH.66.710.05](https://comparepv.com/panel/vikram-solar-hypersol-vsmdh-66-710-05) | 710 | 22.9 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, operating under the Hanwha Q CELLS brand, is a South Korean-owned manufacturer whose roots trace to a German cell pioneer acquired by Hanwha Group in 2012. It holds BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and has built a formidable North American manufacturing presence, with module capacity in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia amounting to roughly 8.4 GW per year - making it the largest crystalline silicon solar module producer in North America. Its South Korean facilities add several further gigawatts of cell and module capacity. Vikram Solar is an Indian manufacturer founded in 2006 and headquartered in Kolkata. It re-entered the BloombergNEF Tier 1 list in Q1 2024 and has been expanding aggressively, commissioning a new 5 GW automated module plant in Tamil Nadu in late 2025 to bring its stated total nameplate capacity to roughly 9.5 GW. In terms of institutional footprint and brand recognition in Western markets, Q-Cells holds the stronger position.

Both companies have moved beyond legacy PERC technology. Q-Cells built its reputation on its proprietary Q.ANTUM PERC cell design and is transitioning its premium lines toward TOPCon. Vikram Solar similarly offers both Mono PERC and N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under its Paradea and Hypersol series respectively, with its newer facilities also engineered for eventual HJT production. Q-Cells targets the full spectrum from premium residential rooftops to utility-scale ground mounts, with particularly strong uptake among US residential installers. Vikram Solar serves residential, commercial, and utility customers across more than 30 countries, with a heavier concentration in the Indian subcontinent and select European and Asian markets.

For a buyer in the US or Western Europe, Q-Cells is generally the lower-risk default - its domestic US manufacturing offers IRA compliance advantages and its installer network is well established. Vikram Solar is a credible alternative for utility-scale or commercial projects in markets where it has a distribution presence, especially where its competitive pricing on TOPCon bifacial modules is a priority.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels \| QCells Solar Panels Review 2025 - EcoWatch \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/vikram-solar/ \| Vikram Solar Panels - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/11/27/indias-vikram-solar-commissions-5-gw-automated-module-plant/ \| India's Vikram Solar commissions 5 GW automated module plant - PV Magazine \| article

\- https://renewablewatch.in/2025/02/20/vikram-solar-gets-1-gw-capacity-boost-upgrades-facility-with-superior-efficiency-solar-modules/ \| Vikram Solar Gets 1 GW Capacity Boost, Upgrades Facility - Renewable Watch \| article

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[QCells Solar Panels Review - EcoWatch\](https://www.ecowatch.com/solar/reviews/qcells-solar-panels)

\- \[Vikram Solar Panels - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar-panels/vikram-solar/)

\- \[Vikram Solar commissions 5 GW automated module plant - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/2025/11/27/indias-vikram-solar-commissions-5-gw-automated-module-plant/)

\- \[Vikram Solar Gets 1 GW Capacity Boost - Renewable Watch\](https://renewablewatch.in/2025/02/20/vikram-solar-gets-1-gw-capacity-boost-upgrades-facility-with-superior-efficiency-solar-modules/)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-vikram-solar)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Vikram Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-vikram-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-vikram-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.