---
title: "Q-Cells vs Tesla - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Tesla solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-tesla"
---

# Q-Cells vs Tesla

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Tesla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | USA |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Austin |
| Founded | 1999 | 2003 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 100000+ |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL | NASDAQ: TSLA |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.tesla.com](https://www.tesla.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Tesla, Inc. is an American multinational automotive and clean energy company headquartered in Austin, Texas. The company designs, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, battery energy storage devices, solar panels and solar roof tiles, and related products and services. Tesla is working towards end-to-end solar...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Tesla | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 0 | +89 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 0 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 0 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Tesla | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Tesla | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 0 (0%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Tesla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Tesla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Tesla |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, operating as Hanwha Q CELLS, is a South Korean-German manufacturer founded in Germany in 1999 and acquired by the Hanwha Group - a Fortune Global 500 South Korean conglomerate - in 2012. It holds a confirmed BloombergNEF Top Tier bankability rating and was named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech company, signaling strong institutional confidence. The company operates a global production footprint of roughly 11 to 12 GW of annual module capacity, including the largest solar manufacturing facility in the Western Hemisphere, located in Dalton, Georgia. Tesla Energy, by contrast, is a US-based brand rooted in the 2016 acquisition of SolarCity; it functions primarily as an integrated installer and energy-services company rather than a panel manufacturer in its own right. Tesla does not appear on standard BNEF Tier 1 manufacturer lists, and its published capacity figures reflect energy-system deployments rather than panel production. On institutional footprint, Q-Cells has the considerably stronger standing.

Q-Cells targets premium and mid-market residential rooftops through its Q.ANTUM NEO line, which is built on TOPCon cell technology and reaches module efficiencies in the 21 to 23 percent range on top-tier models, alongside legacy Q.ANTUM PERC modules for cost-sensitive commercial projects. The brand is stocked by roughly 58 percent of US solar installers, making it broadly accessible through local and regional companies. Tesla's current residential offering centers on the T400H, a 400-watt all-black module with efficiencies between 19.3 and 20.6 percent; it is sold exclusively through Tesla's own direct-to-consumer channel and integrates tightly with the Powerwall battery ecosystem, making it most relevant to buyers who want a single-brand solar-plus-storage solution.

For a typical residential buyer in 2025 who is not already committed to the Tesla ecosystem, Q-Cells is the more defensible default: it offers higher verified efficiencies, a stronger manufacturer warranty track record, wider installer choice, and independently confirmed Tier 1 bankability. Tesla's appeal is largely ecosystem convenience, which matters most when Powerwall storage is part of the plan - not for standalone solar.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q-Cells solar panels complete review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/tesla-solar-panels/ \| Tesla solar panels review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert review of Qcells solar panels for 2025 - SolarReviews \| review

\- https://www.paradisesolarenergy.com/blog/q-cells-vs-tesla-which-solar-panel-is-better/ \| Q Cells vs Tesla: Find the best solar panel for you - Paradise Energy \| article

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/ \| Q Cells achieves Top Tier bankability score in BloombergNEF report - PV Magazine \| article

Sources:

\- \[Q-Cells Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/)

\- \[Tesla Solar Panels Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/tesla-solar-panels/)

\- \[Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Q Cells vs Tesla - Paradise Energy\](https://www.paradisesolarenergy.com/blog/q-cells-vs-tesla-which-solar-panel-is-better/)

\- \[Q Cells achieves Top Tier bankability score in BloombergNEF - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells named S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech company\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Tesla](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tesla)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Tesla](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tesla)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Tesla](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tesla)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-tesla

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.