---
title: "Q-Cells vs Tangra - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Tangra solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-tangra"
---

# Q-Cells vs Tangra

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Wuxi |
| Founded | 1999 | 2016 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 500-1000 |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 5-10 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL |  |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.thornova-solar.com](https://www.thornova-solar.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Tangra is the flagship solar module product line of Sunova Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (rebranded as Thornova Solar), a Chinese photovoltaic manufacturer founded in 2016 and headquartered in Wuxi, Jiangsu Province. The company specializes in high-efficiency N-type TOPCon bifacial modules under the Tangra series (S, M...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Tangra | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 0 | +89 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 0 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 0 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Tangra | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Tangra | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 0 (0%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Tangra |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, operating as the Qcells Division of South Korea's Hanwha Group, traces its roots to a German startup founded in 1999 and acquired by Hanwha in 2012. It holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 manufacturer status and operates global module production capacity reported at roughly 11 GW per year, with a significant domestic U.S. footprint anchored by facilities in Dalton and Cartersville, Georgia. Tangra is the flagship module line of Thornova Solar, a company founded in the United States in 2022, with manufacturing concentrated in China and Indonesia. Thornova achieved Bloomberg Tier 1 status within its first year - a rapid accreditation for a young brand - and reports aggregate cell and module capacity across its Asian facilities in the several-GW range. On institutional footprint, Q-Cells' decade-plus track record, balance-sheet backing from Hanwha, and domestic U.S. manufacturing give it a clear advantage.

Q-Cells covers residential rooftops, commercial rooftops, and utility-scale ground mounts through a broad product portfolio. Its current top-of-range modules use Q.ANTUM NEO cell technology, which is Qcells' implementation of TOPCon, with independently verified efficiencies reaching up to 23.7% in the highest-output residential models and a published 25-year product warranty. Tangra modules - particularly the Tangra M PRO and Tangra L PRO HD series - are N-type bifacial TOPCon designs rated in the 575-620W range, oriented primarily toward commercial and utility-scale buyers. Kiwa PVEL recognized the Tangra M PRO as a Top Performer across all seven of its reliability test categories, a meaningful third-party credential for a newer brand.

For most buyers in 2025, Q-Cells is the lower-risk default: its warranty infrastructure is backed by a large conglomerate, its U.S. manufacturing partially insulates buyers from tariff exposure, and its product lineup spans virtually every segment. Tangra suits buyers who need high-wattage bifacial utility modules and value PVEL Top Performer status, but Thornova's short history and its 2025 acquisition by ICE EYE add supply-chain and warranty continuity questions that warrant due diligence.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Hanwha Q CELLS solar panels - expert review 2025 \| review

\- https://www.pvknowhow.com/news/thornova-solar-launches-pv-production-indonesia/ \| Thornova Solar launches PV production in Indonesia for U.S. market \| article

\- https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/ \| Hanwha Qcells record cell efficiency and $1.45B DOE loan \| article

\- https://a1solarstore.com/blog/thornova-solar-panels-review-sharp-solutions.html \| Thornova Solar panels review 2026 - A1 SolarStore \| review

Sources:

\- \[Hanwha Q CELLS Solar Panels Review 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Thornova Solar Launches PV Production in Indonesia\](https://www.pvknowhow.com/news/thornova-solar-launches-pv-production-indonesia/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells Record Efficiency and DOE Loan\](https://carboncredits.com/hanwha-qcells-shines-with-record-breaking-solar-cell-efficiency-and-1-45-billion-doe-loan/)

\- \[Thornova Solar Panels Review\](https://a1solarstore.com/blog/thornova-solar-panels-review-sharp-solutions.html)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-tangra)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-tangra)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Tangra](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-tangra)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-tangra

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.