---
title: "Q-Cells vs SunEvo Solar - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs SunEvo Solar solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-sunevo-solar"
---

# Q-Cells vs SunEvo Solar

SunEvo Solar has the broader catalog (204 vs 89 models). SunEvo Solar leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%.


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Hefei |
| Founded | 1999 |  |
| Employees | 2000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes | no |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL |  |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.sunevosolar.com](https://www.sunevosolar.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 204 | +115 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 750 W | +75 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 528 W | +60 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 24.10% | +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 21.92% | +0.70 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.303%/°C | +0.022 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 96 (47%) | +8 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 28.2 yrs | +1.2 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

SunEvo Solar skews to higher efficiency: 13% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 6 (2.9%) |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 19 (9.3%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 52 (25.5%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 100 (49.0%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 27 (13.2%) |


## Power distribution

SunEvo Solar offers more 600W+ panels (32% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 6 (2.9%) |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 89 (43.6%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 44 (21.6%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 47 (23.0%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 18 (8.8%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (47%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | SunEvo Solar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 20 (9.8%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 5 (2.5%) |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 27 (13.2%) |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 96 (47.1%) |
| Back Contact | 0 | 32 (15.7%) |
| HJT | 0 | 24 (11.8%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, SunEvo Solar


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE6-66HBD-750W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-750w) | 750 | 24.1 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE6-66HBD-745W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-745w) | 745 | 24.0 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE6-66HBD-740W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-740w) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE6-66HBD-735W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-735w) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE6-66HBD-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE6-66HBD-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE6-66HBD-730W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-730w) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE6-66HBD-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.240 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE6-66HBD-720](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-720) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE6-66HBD-720W](https://comparepv.com/panel/sunevo-solar-se6-66hbd-720w) | 720 | 23.2 | -0.280 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells operates as a brand under South Korea's Hanwha Group, which acquired the original German Q-Cells company out of insolvency in 2012. Hanwha Q CELLS holds confirmed BloombergNEF Tier 1 bankability status and was named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech company, reflecting both its financial depth and institutional credibility. The company operates approximately 8 GW of N-type TOPCon cell production capacity in South Korea and is commissioning a module factory in Dalton, Georgia, USA, targeting roughly 3 GW of capacity. Among the two brands discussed here, Q-Cells has the substantially stronger institutional footprint, holding the top market-share position in U.S. residential and commercial solar for more than six consecutive years.

The flagship Q.TRON product family, built on Hanwha's proprietary Q.ANTUM NEO N-type TOPCon technology, covers residential rooftop panels reaching around 460 Wp in the Q.TRON BLK series, as well as bifacial Q.TRON XL modules designed for utility-scale and large commercial ground-mount projects. Module efficiencies reach approximately 22.5%, and all products carry a 25-year product and performance warranty. In late 2024, Hanwha achieved a reported world record of 28.6% efficiency on industrial-sized perovskite-silicon tandem cells, signaling a credible roadmap for next-generation product lines.

SunEvo Solar is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2011 and headquartered in Hefei, Anhui Province. The company reports a production capacity of approximately 7.5 GW and cumulative global shipments exceeding 14 GW across more than 80 countries. Its technology portfolio spans TOPCon, HJT, back-contact, shingled, and transparent modules targeting residential, commercial, and utility segments. SunEvo holds ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001 management certifications alongside UL, TÜV, and IEC product approvals. However, independent verification of SunEvo's presence on the BloombergNEF or PV ModuleTech bankability lists was not found in publicly available sources, which is a material limitation for project-financed or lender-scrutinized procurement. For cost-sensitive buyers pursuing smaller off-grid or self-financed distributed installations, SunEvo can be a viable option - but the two brands are not interchangeable where lender or insurer approval of the module supplier is a hard contractual requirement.

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SunEvo Solar](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-sunevo-solar)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SunEvo Solar](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-sunevo-solar)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs SunEvo Solar](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-sunevo-solar)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-sunevo-solar

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.

