---
title: "Q-Cells vs Solarever - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Solarever solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-solarever"
---

# Q-Cells vs Solarever

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 12 models). Solarever leads on peak efficiency at 23.52%. Solarever leans bifacial (100% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | Mexico |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Colima |
| Founded | 1999 | 2012 |
| Employees | 2000+ |  |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 1-2 GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL |  |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.solarever.com.mx](https://www.solarever.com.mx) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Solarever is a Mexican solar panel manufacturer, recognized as the number one national solar brand in Mexico, with a main production facility in the state of Colima. The company produces monocrystalline half-cut mono PERC solar panels and expanded into the US market in 2015-2016 through Solarever USA, with offices in...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 12 | +77 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 630 W | +45 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 550 W | +82 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 23.52% | +0.32 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 22.88% | +1.66 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Solarever | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.294%/°C | +0.030 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 12 (100%) | +61 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 30.0 yrs | +3.0 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Solarever skews to higher efficiency: 42% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 7 (58.3%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 5 (41.7%) |


## Power distribution

Solarever offers more 600W+ panels (58% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 5 (41.7%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 7 (58.3%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **TOPCon** (100%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Solarever |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 12 (100.0%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Solarever


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [SE-182\*105-630M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-630m-132-bd) | 630 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [SE-182\*105-625M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-625m-132-bd) | 625 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [SE-182\*105-620M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-620m-132-bd) | 620 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [SE-182\*105-615M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-615m-132-bd) | 615 | 22.8 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [SE-182\*105-610M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-610m-132-bd) | 610 | 22.6 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [SE-182\*105-605M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-605m-132-bd) | 605 | 22.4 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [SE-182\*105-600M-132-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-600m-132-bd) | 600 | 22.2 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [SE-182\*105-470M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-470m-96-bd) | 470 | 23.5 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [SE-182\*105-465M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-465m-96-bd) | 465 | 23.3 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [SE-182\*105-460M-96-BD](https://comparepv.com/panel/solarever-se-182-105-460m-96-bd) | 460 | 23.0 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells was founded in 1999 in Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany, and after an insolvency in 2012 was acquired by South Korea's Hanwha Group, which now operates it as Hanwha Q Cells with headquarters in Seoul and continued engineering and manufacturing roots in Germany, plus significant US production in Georgia (module capacity reported around 8.4 GW domestically, with global figures cited near 11-12 GW). It holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 bankability status and is one of the most established brands in the industry, backed by its proprietary Q.ANTUM cell technology. Solarever, by contrast, is a much younger company that designs modules in China, manufactures in Mexico, and assembles in the US, distributing in the American market since 2015; it has positioned itself as one of the first Tier 1 rated panel producers based in Mexico, though it remains a comparatively low-recognition brand without the decades-long institutional track record or comparable disclosed production scale of Q-Cells. On institutional footprint, Q-Cells is clearly the stronger and more established name.

In terms of product focus, Q-Cells concentrates on premium residential and commercial rooftop modules built around its Q.ANTUM cell architecture, and its panels are widely specified in bankable utility and distributed-generation projects across the US and Europe. Solarever's lineup spans 400W to 560W panels, including N-type bifacial modules, with reported efficiencies in the 20.5 to 22.5 percent range, aimed mainly at the mid-price residential and small commercial segment in the US and Mexico, where its regional manufacturing gives it shorter lead times than many overseas competitors.

For a typical buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is the safer default where long-term bankability, financing eligibility, and a lengthy performance track record matter most, since its Tier 1 status and institutional backing are well documented. Solarever can be a reasonable alternative for North American buyers prioritizing faster regional delivery and competitive mid-tier pricing, but it lacks the brand history and independently verified production scale that make Q-Cells the more conservative choice for large or financed installations.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 \| review

\- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanwha\_Q\_Cells \| Qcells history, Hanwha acquisition, Q.ANTUM technology \| article

\- https://www.renvu.com/blogs/learn/tier-1-solar-panels-list-2025-updated-manufacturers-rankings \| Tier 1 Solar Panels List 2025: Updated Manufacturers & Rankings \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/solarever-expert-review \| 2025 Expert Review Of Solarever USA Solar Panels \| review

\- https://pv-magazine-usa.com/2022/06/17/solarever-looks-to-strengthen-us-market-presence-with-20-4-efficient-410-w-solar-module/ \| Solarever looks to strengthen US market presence with 20.4% module \| article

Written by claude-sonnet-5 from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solarever)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solarever)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Solarever](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solarever)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-solarever

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.