---
title: "Q-Cells vs SolarEdge - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs SolarEdge solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-solaredge"
---

# Q-Cells vs SolarEdge

Q-Cells has the broader catalog (89 vs 0 models). Q-Cells leans bifacial (39% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | SolarEdge |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | Israel |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Herzliya |
| Founded | 1999 | 2006 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 3000-5000 |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year |  |
| Tier 1 | yes |  |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL | NASDAQ: SEDG |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [https://www.solaredge.com](https://www.solaredge.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

SolarEdge Technologies is an Israeli energy technology company specializing in DC-optimized inverter systems, power optimizers, and energy management solutions for solar PV installations. The company is a global leader in smart inverter technology, enabling module-level monitoring and optimization to maximize energy...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | SolarEdge | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 0 | +89 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 0 W | +675 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 0 W | +468 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | SolarEdge | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | - |  |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | - |  |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | SolarEdge | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | - |  |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 0 (0%) | +39 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | - |  |


## Efficiency distribution

Q-Cells skews to higher efficiency: 2% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | SolarEdge |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 0 |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 0 |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 0 |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 0 |


## Power distribution

Q-Cells offers more 600W+ panels (19% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | SolarEdge |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 0 |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 0 |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 0 |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | SolarEdge |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 0 |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 0 |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 0 |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

Q-Cells, operating under parent company Hanwha Group, is a South Korean-German solar panel manufacturer headquartered in Seoul and originally founded in Germany in 1999 before Hanwha's acquisition in 2012. The brand holds a confirmed Top Tier bankability score in BloombergNEF's module manufacturer ranking and was named an S&P Global 2025 Tier 1 Cleantech company. Combined global production capacity across its facilities reaches an estimated 11-12 GW per year, anchored by the largest solar manufacturing plant in the Western Hemisphere in Dalton, Georgia. SolarEdge, by contrast, is an Israeli company founded in 2006 and is primarily known as the world's leading residential and commercial solar inverter manufacturer - not a panel producer in the conventional sense. It has shipped over 107 million power optimizers and 4.5 million inverters globally, and is ramping up US domestic manufacturing of inverters and optimizers. In terms of institutional footprint for panel procurement specifically, Q-Cells has the stronger standing.

Q-Cells targets residential rooftops and mid-scale commercial installations with its Q.PEAK and Q.TRON module families, built on PERC and newer cell technology platforms. Panels are positioned as a premium-to-mid-market choice with 25-year product warranties and temperature coefficients that outperform the industry average. SolarEdge's entry into panel hardware takes the form of its Smart Modules - standard panels with an embedded DC power optimizer - rather than a standalone cell manufacturing program. These are designed to work exclusively with SolarEdge inverters and are aimed at residential installers already committed to the SolarEdge ecosystem, with a 25-year combined warranty covering both panel and optimizer.

For a buyer choosing a solar panel brand, Q-Cells and SolarEdge are not direct substitutes. Q-Cells is a pure-play module manufacturer suitable for any inverter pairing, while SolarEdge's panel offering is a system-lock add-on. Buyers seeking a bankable, inverter-agnostic panel with strong warranty coverage will find Q-Cells the more practical default, while SolarEdge's Smart Module makes most sense as an upgrade within an existing SolarEdge inverter installation.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review of Qcells Solar Panels for 2025 \| review

\- https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/ \| Q CELLS Solar Panels - Complete Review - EnergySage \| review

\- https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/ \| Q Cells achieves Top Tier bankability score in BloombergNEF \| article

\- https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/solaredge-inverter-optimiser-review \| SolarEdge Inverter and Optimiser Review - Clean Energy Reviews \| review

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/solaredge-products-expert-review \| SolarEdge Products Expert Review - SolarReviews \| review

Sources:

\- \[Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review)

\- \[Q CELLS Solar Panels Complete Review - EnergySage\](https://www.energysage.com/solar/best-solar-panels-complete-ranking/q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review/)

\- \[Q Cells achieves Top Tier bankability score in BloombergNEF - PV Magazine\](https://www.pv-magazine.com/press-releases/q-cells-achieves-top-tier-class-bankability-score-in-latest-bloombergnef-report/)

\- \[Hanwha Qcells named 2025 S&P Global Tier 1 company\](https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-qcells-named-an-s-p-global-2025-tier-1-cleantech-company.do)

\- \[SolarEdge Inverter and Optimiser Review - Clean Energy Reviews\](https://www.cleanenergyreviews.info/blog/solaredge-inverter-optimiser-review)

\- \[SolarEdge Products Expert Review - SolarReviews\](https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/solaredge-products-expert-review)

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs SolarEdge](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-solaredge)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs SolarEdge](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-solaredge)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs SolarEdge](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-solaredge)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-solaredge

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.