---
title: "Q-Cells vs Runergy - Brand Comparison | ComparePV"
description: "Compare Q-Cells vs Runergy solar panels: full portfolio, efficiency, cell technology breakdown, warranty terms and company background."
source: "https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-runergy"
---

# Q-Cells vs Runergy

Runergy has the broader catalog (124 vs 89 models). Runergy leads on peak efficiency at 24.10%. Runergy leans bifacial (77% of lineup).


## The two companies


| Attribute | Q-Cells | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Country | South Korea | China |
| Headquarters | Seoul | Yancheng, Jiangsu Province |
| Founded | 1999 | 2013 |
| Employees | 2000+ | 15,000 |
| Annual capacity | 11.2 GW/year | 23GW (module capacity), 63GW (cell capacity) GW/year |
| Tier 1 | yes | yes |
| Listed | NASDAQ: HQCL |  |
| Website | [https://www.qcells.com](https://www.qcells.com) | [http://www.runergy.com](http://www.runergy.com) |

Qcells is a renowned global provider of complete energy solutions, specializing in solar cells and modules, energy storage solutions, downstream project business, and energy retail. The company has a strong heritage dating back to its foundation in Germany and has become a leader in technology innovations. As an...

Runergy is a global leader in solar technology, specializing in the R&D and production of high-efficiency solar cells and modules. The company is committed to innovation, quality, and providing a transparent and efficient supply chain to meet the growing global demand for clean energy. They have established production...


## Catalog & Power


| Measure | Q-Cells | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Panel Models | 89 | 124 | +35 |
| Max Power | 675 W | 740 W | +65 W |
| Avg Power | 468 W | 579 W | +111 W |


## Efficiency


| Measure | Q-Cells | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Max Efficiency | 23.20% | 24.10% | +0.90 pp |
| Avg Efficiency | 21.21% | 22.42% | +1.20 pp |


## Reliability & Warranty


| Measure | Q-Cells | Runergy | Margin |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Avg Temp Coefficient | -0.325%/°C | -0.298%/°C | +0.026 |
| Bifacial Share | 35 (39%) | 95 (77%) | +37 pp |
| Avg Warranty | 27.0 yrs | 29.1 yrs | +2.1 yr |


## Efficiency distribution

Runergy skews to higher efficiency: 33% of lineup is 23%+


| Efficiency band | Q-Cells | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<20% | 7 (7.9%) | 0 |
| 20-21% | 29 (32.6%) | 9 (7.3%) |
| 21-22% | 30 (33.7%) | 26 (21.0%) |
| 22-23% | 21 (23.6%) | 48 (38.7%) |
| 23%+ | 2 (2.2%) | 41 (33.1%) |


## Power distribution

Runergy offers more 600W+ panels (48% of lineup)


| Power band | Q-Cells | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| \<400W | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| 400-499W | 41 (46.1%) | 36 (29.0%) |
| 500-599W | 11 (12.4%) | 28 (22.6%) |
| 600-699W | 17 (19.1%) | 35 (28.2%) |
| 700W+ | 0 | 25 (20.2%) |


## Cell technology

Dominant cell tech: **PERC** (43%)

Dominant cell tech: **N-type** (60%)


| Technology | Q-Cells | Runergy |
| --- | --- | --- |
| PERC | 38 (42.7%) | 32 (25.8%) |
| N-type | 23 (25.8%) | 74 (59.7%) |
| Unknown | 20 (22.5%) | 0 |
| TOPCon | 8 (9.0%) | 0 |
| HJT | 0 | 18 (14.5%) |


## Top panels, Q-Cells


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 675](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-675) | 675 | 21.7 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 670](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-670) | 670 | 21.6 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 665](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-665) | 665 | 21.4 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 660](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-660) | 660 | 21.2 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 655](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-655) | 655 | 21.1 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [Q.PEAK DUO ML-G12S.3 / BFG 650](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-peak-duo-ml-g12s-3-bfg-650) | 650 | 20.9 | -0.340 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 645](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-645) | 645 | 23.1 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 640](https://comparepv.com/panel/q-cells-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-640) | 640 | 22.9 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 635](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-635) | 635 | 22.7 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [Q.TRON XL-G2.3 / BFG 630](https://comparepv.com/panel/hanwha-q-cells-america-inc-q-tron-xl-g2-3-bfg-630) | 630 | 22.6 | -0.300 | Monocrystalline |


## Top panels, Runergy


| # | Model | Power | Efficiency | Temp. coefficient | Technology |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | [HY-DH132H10-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 2 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-740](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-740) | 740 | 23.8 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 3 | [HY-DH132H10-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 4 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-735](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-735) | 735 | 23.7 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 5 | [HY-DH132H10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 6 | [HY-DH132N10-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 7 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-730](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-730) | 730 | 23.5 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 8 | [HY-DH132H10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |
| 9 | [HY-DH132N10-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132n10-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.290 | Monocrystalline |
| 10 | [HY-DH132H10-Plus-725](https://comparepv.com/panel/runergy-hy-dh132h10-plus-725) | 725 | 23.3 | -0.260 | Monocrystalline |


## Summary

I have enough sourced information now.

Q-Cells is a South Korean owned brand, part of Hanwha Group, originally founded in Germany in 1999 before Hanwha acquired the business and rebuilt it into Hanwha Q CELLS. It holds Bloomberg NEF Tier 1 status and a 2025 S&P Global Tier 1 Cleantech designation, with global module production capacity in the roughly 11-12 GW range and the largest solar manufacturing plant in the Western Hemisphere located in Dalton, Georgia. Runergy, formally Jiangsu Runergy New Energy Technology Co., Ltd, is a Chinese manufacturer founded in 2013 in Yancheng that has earned BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Maker status for six consecutive quarters through Q1 2025. Runergy has scaled aggressively on the cell side, reporting around 63 GW of global high-efficiency cell capacity by the end of 2024 alongside a smaller module capacity, and runs facilities in China, Thailand, Vietnam and the United States. Q-Cells carries the stronger institutional footprint in Western markets thanks to its US manufacturing base, longer brand history and top-line US residential and commercial market share, while Runergy's scale and bankability are more recently earned and concentrated on the cell-production side of the value chain.

In terms of product focus, Q-Cells serves the residential and commercial rooftop segment with lines like the Q.PEAK DUO for standard installations, the Q.PEAK DUO Black for aesthetics-focused rooftops, and the higher-efficiency Q.TRON series, plus the Q.PEAK DUO XL for larger commercial and utility-scale projects with bifacial options. Runergy is positioned primarily as a large-scale n-type TOPCon cell and module supplier, having pushed TOPCon efficiency to a certified 26.9 percent in partnership with Fraunhofer ISE, and its output is typically channeled into commercial and utility-scale installations through module partners and its own expanding module lines rather than a strong direct-to-homeowner brand presence in Western markets.

For a typical US or European residential buyer in 2025, Q-Cells is generally the more established default given its longer track record, domestic US manufacturing, and dedicated residential product tiers with clear warranty positioning. Runergy is a credible and increasingly bankable choice for commercial and utility-scale buyers or integrators sourcing high-efficiency TOPCon cells and modules, but it is less of a household name for homeowners, so the better fit depends heavily on project scale and market.

\---LINKS---

\- https://www.hanwha.com/newsroom/news/press-releases/hanwha-q-cells-maintains-number-one-market-share-in-us-residential-and-commercial-solar-sectors.do \| Hanwha Q CELLS maintains No.1 US residential/commercial share \| article

\- https://www.solarreviews.com/blog/hanwha-q-cells-solar-panels-complete-review \| Expert Review Of Qcells Solar Panels For 2025 \| review

\- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/runergy-ranked-as-a-bloombergnef-tier-1-pv-module-manufacturer-301998949.html \| Runergy Ranked as a BloombergNEF Tier 1 PV Module Manufacturer \| article

\- https://www.pv-tech.org/industry-updates/runergy-rebuilds-pv-value-via-commitment-to-technology-pursuit-and-rejecting-cut-throat-competition/ \| Runergy rebuilds PV value via technology and market strategy \| article

\- https://taiyangnews.info/technology/runergy-introduces-topcon-cell-with-269-conversion-efficiency \| Runergy Introduces TOPCon Cell With 26.9% Conversion Efficiency \| article

Written by claude-sonnet from the figures above.


## Other comparisons

- [Q-Cells vs A.B. Energy](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-a-b-energy)
- [AE Solar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/ae-solar-vs-runergy)
- [Q-Cells vs AEET](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-aeet)
- [AIKO vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/aiko-vs-runergy)
- [Q-Cells vs AKCOME](https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-akcome)
- [ARTsolar vs Runergy](https://comparepv.com/artsolar-vs-runergy)


---

Source: https://comparepv.com/q-cells-vs-runergy

Not in this file, on the page: the distributions above drawn as charts.